Dan Livingston could be a literary invention. The son of progressive activists, he was the boy who talked to Martin Luther King Jr. about social justice, marched on Washington as a 7-year-old and grew up with a passion for movement politics that peers might have felt for baseball cards.
Now, for the second time in eight years, Livingston is the chief negotiator for state employees, facing a governor desperate to balance a budget by wringing concessions out of labor. The last time, the talks ended badly for all parties -- layoffs of 3,000 workers and an erosion of support for the governor, John G. Rowland.
This time, Livingston is facing the administration of an ostensible ally, Dannel P. Malloy, the first Democratic governor in 20 years. Malloy is demanding $1 billion from labor, saying the alternative is "unimaginable consequences" for labor and all of Connecticut.
Labor leaders compliment Malloy for much of his budget, including his willingness to take a step embraced by few other governors -- proposing a $1.5 billion tax increase, rather than gut state aid to municipalities. But their praise is tempered by disappointment over who would pay those new taxes.
At town hall meetings, like the one Monday night in Norwalk, union members regularly confront Malloy over taxes, complaining they would fall too heavily on the middle class, letting off the richest of the rich relatively lightly.
"With your proposal, you're ultimately destroying my way of life and my friends," said Jessica Carroll, a Department of Social Services employee, who complained of facing concessions and a tax hike. "How can you call it a shared sacrifice?"
It is a question Livingston calls relevant to the broader budget debate, even though it cannot come up in concession talks.
"We don't bargain about taxes," Livingston said.
But it hangs over everything. To Livingston, tax equity is part of a 30-year conversation about the concentration of wealth in the hands of fewer and fewer Americans.
"There's been a war on middle-class and working families, and an economy that works very well for a very small percentage of the people, and not very well at all for the vast majority. And we'd like to see that change," Livingston said. Then he broke into a grin and added, "We haven't really kept that secret."
Little about the passions and politics of Daniel E. Livingston are secret.
At 55, he still is the son of David and Beatrice Livingston, the couple who used to entertain King at their home in Manhasset, Long Island. The walls of his cramped office on Prospect Avenue on the Hartford-West Hartford line are a testament to his political DNA.
His father, David Livingston, who died at age 80 in 1995, was a Columbia University student who organized rallies against Hitler on campus before the outbreak of World War II, then became a labor leader. He was president of District 65 of the United Auto Workers, a local that represented everyone from textile workers to writers for the Village Voice. Livingston's mother was a psychiatric social worker.
The son, who is a divorced father of two sons, works in an office dominated by black-and-white photographs of demonstrations and rallies, most featuring his father, a man with horn-rimmed glasses and dark, wavy hair. In one picture, his father is addressing thousands at an outdoor rally opposing Richard Nixon and the war in Vietnam.
It was a memorable day. It was the first time Livingston heard his father curse.
His father denounced Nixon. The crowd responded with a profane, two-word chant. The second word was "Nixon," the first an epithet never heard in the Livingston house, at least not during the waking hours of the Livingston children.
His father glanced at the son, then at the crowd, back to the son. The crowd's chant was insistent. David Livingston finally gave in to the moment, thrusting his fist in the air and yelling, "F--- Nixon!"
These are the stories of Danny Livingston's childhood.
He grins as he tells the story. It an impossibly wide smile, both boyish and slightly maniacal.
Another picture is of a more decorous scene, his father seated across from Eleanor Roosevelt. Then there is a photo of David Livingston at the 1963 March on Washington.
Seven-year old Danny peeks out from behind a placard held by his father.
His father's union was part of the larger civil rights and, later, anti-war movement. Its headquarters at 13 Astor Place in lower Manhattan was where protests and demonstrations were carefully planned. His parents' home was a place where King could relax on visits to New York.
"He and my dad were good friends. He would stay sometimes at my parents' house," Livingston said. "And I was very, very lucky in terms of being able to see first hand the difference the labor movement makes in the lives of so many people."
Livingston went to work for the union after graduating from Hampshire College, where he was one of the students who occupied to the president's office to protest U.S. foreign policy in the waning days of the Vietnam war.
He worked in New Jersey on a number of labor campaigns, including a drive to organize workers at Hartz Mountain, the pet supplies company then in Jersey City. He was threatened with guns at one point.
The workers unionized, but the company closed its warehouse operation in the northeast.
"It was a success story and not a success story," he said
After two years as an organizer, Livingston entered Yale Law School, his UAW card still in his wallet. He remains a member.
"I went to law school to be a labor and civil rights lawyer," he said.
He has spent nearly his entire legal career at the same firm: Livingston, Adler, Pulda, Meiklejohn & Kelly. It represents unions, plus individuals who bring labor and employment discrimination cases. His facebook page describes him as the firm's "Longest Serving Troublemaker."
His client in the concession talks is SEBAC, the State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition. But he represents other unions. A partner, Gregg Adler, is the lead attorney for the International Association of Machinists in Connecticut.
Livingston said he misses organizing.
"I still struggle. Being an organizer is to me the most noble and important thing you can do, and I try as a lawyer to emulate the things good organizers do," Livingston said. "The way they help empower people to change their lives, organizing is one of the most amazing experiences of my life."
In the concession talks, Livingston faces Mark Ojakian, an ally in some past fights for civil rights. Ojakian, who is the deputy secretary of the Office of Policy and Management, has known Livingston for years.
"He is a very passionate guy, extremely passionate. And he is very ideological in his view point," Ojakian said. "I think some other leaders might be more pragmatic. I think Danny is pragmatic in a sense, but he really believes in what he's doing, and that's a good thing."
Livingston acknowledges that passion must be tempered in negotiations.
"You have the potential for making the biggest difference if you have a passionate commitment to the long term ideals of the working families you represent and the movement to make a more just society, but that is always tempered with an understanding there is a perspective on the other side, and that there are human beings on the other side," Livingston said.
"Passion can get in our way if it's not tempered with empathy. I think without passion, you lose the connection to the real long-term changes, which is what this is about," Livingston said. "The labor movement has always been about being connected to a change in a certain direction, and it's a change that right now, obviously, everybody understands you're running against the wind right now."
But Livingston is an optimist, a believer in cycles.
"I learned from my dad that sometimes the brightest periods follow the darkest periods, and that's been true of labor," he said.
Livingston never has lacked for confidence, in himself or his cause. He is slightly built: he confesses to overcoming a tendency toward self-deprecation in 2003, when he gave his height to a reporter as 5 feet 6. Ask his actual height, he smiles and says, "Five-six. Maybe."
But that did not stop him from rushing to the aid of a friend, Paul Filson, at the AFL-CIO convention in 2006, when Filson erroneously described the position of Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman on a labor issue. It was not malicious, but one of Lieberman's partisans, Martin Dunleavy, became enraged.
Dunleavy, possessed of a stevedore's physique and temper, stormed after Filson, who seemed unaware of the looming danger as he exited the union meeting. Livingston set off after Dunleavy, who outweighed him by at least 100 pounds. A wide-eyed Ken Dagliere, then a Lieberman aide and now a Roman Catholic seminarian, took off after all three.
Dagliere told them to knock it off, noting that a reporter was standing behind them, taking in the whole scene. They stood down.
The reporter asked Livington what exactly had been his plan had he caught Dunleavy? Appeal to his better nature? Bite his ankle? Livingston shrugged, then broke out in that wide, toothy, slightly maniacal grin.
He would have thought of something. But doing nothing, that was not an option.
Back in the days of your father unions were on sounder footing.
Organized labor back then was around 33 - 35 percent of the workforce.
That has changed drastically. Very few private sector unions.
All those private sector jobs craftily and deftly sent over seas; a union busting technique for sure.
Now unions are fighting for their very survival. They don't have the members or the resources to wage good battles.
All they have is the next unborn member to give up.
The next worker to have less wages, less pension, less healthcare.
That's all they have to
Read MoreThe problem with the union business model, including public sector unions is that they don't realize that the dynamics of our labor market require that workers, laborers, professionals, (SUPPLIERS) will only be successful to the extent that they keep CUSTOMERS front of mind. Individuals and institutions, including government services, that are truly customer focused will flourish and prosper. And because they love what they do (serving customers) they will be happy!
Those that are focused primarily on "What's in it for me" (i.e. current union business model) are going to shrink and eventually become extinct in a global
Read Moreoh please
There is no other supplier of services that government supplies
Government is not profit based.
As a matter of fact government is more necessary when times are bad than good.
Based on your explanation then bankers, hedge fund managers,
etc etc that do what they do should just revel in what they do and not worry about their compensation. You know do it for the love of the game.
people got to eat.
they got to pay their rent or mortgage.
they got to cloth their children
What do you do Jeff?.
Public sector employees are
belltro, There are plenty of alternatives to government provided services. The U.S. Post office has been shrinking slowly because of FEDX, UPS, and now the internet. Look around at all the local school districts where lots of non-governmental organizations are delivering education very successfully in place of the traditional government-managed school system. Private social service agencies will be taking on more and more of direct service provision over the next few years as government shrinks.
Yes, of course there are public sector professionals - some of them incredibly talented and inspired. My point is that talented and
Read MoreWhat absolute hogwash! Painting Livingstone as some sort of civil rights hero. His job is to pad the wallets of public sector fat cats. Please, tell me what that has to do with civil rights, standing up for the working stiff, or taking on the Man. Jeez, he IS the Man!
As an older Tier II state employee, I've seen 4 waves of Tier I employees leave between the ages of 55 to 60, with golden handshake enhancements to their already lush retirement program. During the 2009 golden handshake, Tier II employees wanted to know what their pension would be if they were to take the golden handshake. What they found out was that they could not afford to retire, before reaching Social Security age. So, Tier I employees get to retire from the age of 55 to 60. Most Tier II people will retire from 62 to 65, under current
Read MoreTier 1 is the Golden Goose no one wants to touch and every concessions agreement since they started doing concessions agreements has been
crafted to spare the Tier 1 employee at the expense of the next wave.
But you see how that hasn't worked out!
Despite crafting two other pensions Tiers 2 and 2a, Tier 1 is still
underfunded.
And now the state and union negotiators will probably craft Tier 3
which will create a pension that is diminished beyond the very modest
Tiers 2 and 2a.
The state has been derelict in the funding of the pensions.
They are
You're kidding me right? How can you promise someone a benifet package when they are hired and then after 30 to 40 years of service tell them you are going to change the dream they worked for all their life. Fix the probelm you created but not by taking away something that +someone has earned by loyal State service. When Tier 1 started they were making peanuts compared to the private sector and just because after years and years of growth, now all the cry babies come out and cry foul. Malloy needs to look at where the real money
Read MoreI think govt and ed workers are misinformed as far as the pay of the private sector. Of the 500 largest public companies in the country(i.e. that issue stock- IBM- not Subway(for ex) there are less than 20 million workers out of almost 200 million people working. OUt of those 20 million only 1 in 20 get stock options. So this talk of everyone getting stock options is just false- I have never worked for a public company-and neither of many of my friends. Only a tiny fraction get these. As far as bonuses- most are
Read More