Many Connecticut wage earners will notice their paychecks shrinking faster than anticipated starting this August, when the Department of Revenue Services begins implementing the new $875 million state income tax increase.
That's because the tax hike, which adds three new tax rates, reduces a property tax credit and adds an earned income credit for poor families, is retroactive to Jan. 1, but won't be drawn from paychecks until August.
That means the state's tax agency, which released new withholding tables this week, has five months to collect 12 months' worth of tax obligations. For the 22 weeks between Aug. 1 and Dec. 31, the additional withholding will be about 2.4 times the increase that will be applied starting in January 2012.
"Legislative changes to the income tax for the current year were more complex than usual," DRS Commissioner Kevin B. Sullivan said. "Therefore I am very pleased that we turned around the new interim withholding tables in a couple of weeks so employers have plenty of lead time to get ready."
Until this year, Connecticut taxed most income at 5 percent, though rates of 3 percent on the lowest wages and 6.5 percent on top earnings also were on the books. In addition, the state offers a personal exemption and credit to further reduce taxes on the poorest households.
The tax legislation enacted earlier this month makes a number of changes, including creation of an earned income tax credit for the poorest working families and a reduction in the maximum property tax credit from $500 to $300. But the key to the withholding changes for most taxpayers is the addition of three new income tax rates, including a new top rate of 6.7 percent.
Though the new fiscal year starts July 1, Malloy and lawmaker reached back to the start of the calendar year to impose those new rates. Whatever increased tax burden falls on a worker in 2011 will be withheld from paychecks between Aug. 1 and Dec. 31.
"I expect it will be shock to some," Rep. Patricia Widlitz, D-Guilford, co-chairwoman of the Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee, said Thursday. "But I don't know how else we could do it. It's never s good thing to have your taxes raised, but we tried very hard not to overburden any one group, especially those who can least afford it."
House Minority Leader Lawrence F. Cafero, R-Norwalk, who charges that Malloy and his fellow Democrats in the legislative majority raised taxes too high given the unprecedented $1 billion surplus built into the newly adopted, two-year budget, predicted that so-called "catch-up" period for tax collections particularly will harm the businesses Malloy pledged to protect.
"In these economic times we're going to be banging them more than twice the rate (to collect) a year's worth of increases," Cafero said, noting that many small business owners report their business profits through the income tax, rather than the corporation levy. "Despite what Governor Malloy has said, Connecticut is still not open for business. Actions speak louder than words."
But Roy Occhiogrosso, Malloy's senior adviser, said "the reason that the business community is supporting the governor's budget is because he's done more to stabilize the state's finances than the last two Republican governors have done in 15 years."
Occhiogrosso noted that Malloy announced this week a plan to invest nearly $900 million in public and private funds to expand the University of Connecticut Health Center. The administration projects this would create about 3,000 construction jobs per year through 2018.
"When the governor says the state is open for business," Occhiogrosso added, "he is 100 percent right."
It will be a great summer thanks to our great leaders. July the sales tax goes up and now clothing under $50 is taxed. Property taxes also increase. Then in August they raise the income tax and go retroactive back to January.
The sales tax should be especially good for the elderly on fixed incomes and young families with small children. But they need to realize that the important thing is that the union is taken care of. Remember Malloy is from a union household and the union comes first. If a child or an elderly
Read MoreI'm a state employee, also a union member. I earn $45,000/yr. I am a tax payer who also has a mortgage, property taxes and bills just like everybody else. So, not all union members are "taken care of". I've witnessed first hand, the union protects the slackers & dead weight.
The Communist Demoncrats in this state are in full force. Its so sad they could care less about the hard working familes,seniors. Anyone who votes for a Democrat needs medication. All they do is take. This budget rearranges the problems not solve them.
Wake up people of CT.
This budget is all gimmicks. He is taking income tax from January through June of this fiscal year and counting it for his budget in next fiscal year. He thinks we are stupid. I wonder what else is in this budget? I wonder how real the savings in this budget are.
COME ON, SHARED SACRIFCE YOU VILL PAY and pay and pay to live here.
Start keeping tabs on this stuff ...there will be another election in the future.
To I'm a state employee - Yes, you have been taken care of. I have all the same expenses you talk about but, unlike you, I don't have layoff protection for the next 4 years, nor three percent increases in years 3, 4 and 5 of the agreement along with longevity increases. Longevity increases!?! You guys have it good and aren't going anywhere so why do they give you pay increases just for hanging around? Those of us in the private sector have none of the protections you have as a State employee so, yes, you
Read Morehttp://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=4dd43f36f7828ee0151f2d3f
lets see where we stand… keep voting. show them we mean business. Do not toy with our future. Protect our current contract. Its ours.
July 1 the state of corrupticut officially becomes a socialist state. Over taxed, over regulation, less freedom of choice, no voice, should I continue? How sad.
Oh No Ocho can keep repeating himself with what he thinks is a good line but it's old and cheap, and more importantly, dishonest and irrelevant. When people see their CT witholding more than double, they'll shxt. Widlitz is among the dumb - there was another way of doing this. Don't make it retroactive, and don't build in a more than a billion dollar surplus in the state budget. One really wonders where the common sense is. We are a state governed by self absorbed, naval gazing fools who look at themselves preening in the mirror actling Gods.
To OldGuy61,
You obviously must think ALL state employees hang around and do nothing. I appreciate my state job and Earn my paycheck, but that doesnt mean I like or approve of what our government is doing to the working class. There is no such thing as "layoff protection". Also for all the years, all state employees will be paying extra to fund a retiree pension fund, which WE did not drain. I do not receive ANY longevity check. It was your choice to work in the public sector as it was mine to work for the state. Its
Read MoreLet's see, 2.4 increase in income taxes(5months) increase in healthcare cost, no raises, no Longevity bonus, increase in retirement contribution, decrease in property tax deductions, higher than the national average gas prices..,.,,,why don't I want to keep living in this state, Why? Because I can't sell my house, No one wants to live here.
Gas prices are up, sales taxes increased, unemployment is increased... so let's just decrease people pay checks and make them struggle some more. Sounds PERFECT! Why not wait for the new year to implement new tax rates? Why implement them now and play catch up when the cost of living has increased and jobs have decreased and its hard for people as it is. I'm no politician, but this makes absolutly no logical sense to me what so ever. If someone feels as though they can clarify this for me please feel free to do so.
They waited until the last paycheck of the year to deduct retroactively at my friend's job, and NO ONE GOT A PAYCHECK AT ALL THIS WEEK. Right after Christmas, Merry F-You from the State of CT..... some people were crying because they will not be able to make their mortgage payments on time. Do you think the banks will excuse people because of the greed and incompetence of the state government? Not likely.