March 10, 2010
Should nursing homes evict non-paying patients?
By Jacqueline Rabe
So many Medicaid patients at Leeway nursing home in New Haven fail to pay their bills that the facility has a hard time operating, executive director Martha Dale told legislators Tuesday.
She wants to be able to evict them after 60 days.
"We don't have money to spare," she said. "They have income but somehow they are allowed to not pay us and still live there."
Medicaid regulations require patients who have income to pay a portion of their nursing home bills. Under state law, however, residents on Medicaid can't be discharged from a nursing home for non-payment.
A bill before the Select Committee on Aging would change that, but legislators and elderly advocates worry the measure would result in elderly patients being evicted with nowhere to go.
"This is a tough one I tell you. On one side you have these facilities not getting paid fairly. But my question is, where will these people go," said Sen. Edith G. Prague, D-Columbia, co-chairman of the committee.
Maybe eviction is not the solution, but a change needs to be made to give nursing homes more options, said Russell Schwartz, spokesman for the Connecticut Association of Health Care Facilities. His organization represents about half of the state's 241 nursing homes.
"There is no incentive to get people to pay. Look, they signed a deal and agreed to pay for a certain share of the costs," said Schwartz during an interview, who is also the director of Avon Health Center and West Hartford Health & Rehabilitation Center. "It is becoming more and more common for us not to get paid. And there is nothing we can do."
About 98 percent of nursing home residents in Connecticut are on Medicaid, but Schwartz said Medicaid only pays for about 60 percent of the actual bill.
"We need some means to cut the bleeding," he said.
Committee members said it's unlikely they will support the eviction proposal, but they said they will consider alternatives to help nursing homes avoid bankruptcy.
Department of Social Services Spokesman David Dearborn said the department has seen a spike in nursing home bankruptcies since the recession began. In 2006 no nursing home was in bankruptcy, compared with 20 in 2008 and seven so far this year.
Sen. John A. Kissel of Enfield, ranking Republican on the committee, suggested the state could allow nursing homes to garnish a portion of a non-paying resident's income or make it easier for them to go after assets in probate court.
"I would have no problem giving nursing homes added remedies to recover their costs," said Kissel.
Connecticut Legal Services director of elder law Kevin Brophy and the DSS long term care ombudsman Nancy Shaffer do not support changing the existing law because it has the potential to put the elderly at-risk.
"We don't know the ramifications. ... The resident may not even be aware that the applied income is being withheld," Shaffer testified, adding residents are oftentimes not involved in managing their finances. "Aren't there other remedies besides discharge to collect applied income?"
Nursing homes are to blame as well, Shaffer said during an interview.
"Good business practices can begin with their administrative offices. Talk to these residents and work out a way to get paid. This is taking a huge step and computes to me as a threat," she said.
Please login or register to post comments
Comments
Nursing homes have dealt with this problem for many years, yet it should not be their problem. Medicaid is a contract between the State of CT and the person receiving the benefits. The state should pay nursing homes their full rate and the state should be responsible for collecting any applied income from the patient/family. The nursing home should not be put in the middle. The nursing home has no standing. They cannot move the patient out because there is no safe place to send them. No other nursing home will take them if they are not paying and if the nursing home requires an attorney to help collect, it is at the expense of the nursing home. Is that fair?
but the collection problems of nursing homes goes beyond the applied income. If a patient enters the home as a private pay and runs out of money, they apply for Medicaid assistance. If there has been a transfer of money or real estate within the last 5 years, the patient may be denied Medicaid benefits for a period of time. The state then stops paying the nursing home for that period of time, even though the nursing home is still providing care. Now the nursing home must try to collect from the person who received the transfer and that is never easy. In the case of a house, families will usually offer to pay $100 a month or something ridiculous like that. That will be for a $40,000 bill. The state has the clout to go after these people. Nursing homes do not, because again, the threat of discharge is only a threat since that person will not be put out on the street and the family knows it.
It is definitely time for the state to step up and take responsibility for their contracts with Medicaid recipients.
Race to the Top
State needs executive leadership to push education reform.
State
The week's reaction to CSU raises and more.
Share your ideas
Contribute to The Connecticut Mirror's op-ed page.
31JulEditor's Choice Elsewhere on the Web
|
With less than two weeks to go before primary day, Republican U.S. Senate candidate Peter Schiff is in the midst of an on-line drive--a "money bomb," he calls it--to raise cash to air his first televised attack ad aimed at front-runner Linda McMahon. Right now, the ad is only available online. Earlier this week, Schiff said he's not inclined to put any more of his own money into the race.
"Money is coming in." Reincarnated GOP U.S. Senate candidate Rob Simmons tells Politico he's getting financial support, although he's not actively raising funds. He's also running a private poll and considering another "public service announcement" (NOT a campaign ad) letting folks know he's on the ballot. Some supporters are ambivalent, like former U.S, Rep. Nancy Johnson: "I'm not optimistic, I'm not pessimistic. I'm kind of neutral. It's hard to predict."
For nearly 30 years, residents of a neighborhood in Haddam have been waiting for state action to clean up contamination in the groundwater that supply the wells they rely on, Nancy Eve Cohen reports on WNPR. The Department of Environmental Protection has yet to identify the source of the pollution that affects about 19 homes.
|
CTMirror Mobile
Visit m.ctmirror.org on your mobile device for the latest headlines right in your palm.



The solution is relatively simple. Pay the nursing homes the full amount and make the Department of Revenue Services responsible for collecting the applied income. Collections is their business.