Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

Blumenthal, McMahon jab and retreat in debate opener

  • by Mark Pazniokas
  • October 4, 2010
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

Democrat Richard Blumenthal and Republican Linda McMahon left their inaugural debate Monday night satisfied that neither had suffered a gaffe likely to haunt the remaining 28 days of their U.S. Senate campaign.

On the Bushnell stage in Hartford, Blumenthal and McMahon alternately threw jabs and retreated to well-practices lines directly out of their TV ads. The one-hour debate was televised live on FoxCT, giving voters statewide a chance to see them side-by-by for the first time.

By two measures, Blumenthal could claim a slight advantage:

He repeatedly forced McMahon to defend her stewardship of World Wrestling Entertainment. And nothing transpired that redefines a race that he leads in all recent polls, despite facing an opponent who already has spent more than $24 million, a record in Connecticut.

“I feel very good about this debate. I feel great about the campaign,” said Blumenthal, who quickly made his way to a post-debate press conference. “I am energized, as is our campaign.”

With every poll showing that the only issue of consequence is jobs, McMahon’s post-debate comments tried to refocus reporters on Blumenthal’s lack of business experience.

“I really believe it was clear from the folks watching at home and those that were in the auditorium that as we look at what is the number one issue in our country, which is jobs and creating jobs, Mr. Blumenthal does not know anything about creating jobs,” she said.

Blumenthal, the attorney general for 20 years, and McMahon, the former chief executive officer of WWE, are vying to succeed the retiring five-term Democrat, Christopher J. Dodd. Warren Mosler and John Mertens, two minor-party candidates, were not invited.

The debate was the first of three, with a fourth under negotiation.

Each candidate was asked to defend against charges in recent attack ads, which were shown to the candidates and audience.

Confronted with a new McMahon ad showing him misrepresenting his service as a stateside Marine Reservist during Vietnam, Blumenthal remained composed and once again apologized for what he called his occasional misstatements about being in Vietnam.

“There is nothing new in this ad, and there is nothing new about the McMahon attack on me,” the Democratic nominee said. Of his misstatements, Blumenthal added, “I regret it. I take full responsibility for it. It was not intentional, but that is no excuse.”

The answer left McMahon with little room to develop the issue, and she did not mention it for the rest of the debate. It will be left to McMahon’s ads to see if the issue can help erase a Blumenthal lead that has ranged from three to 12 percentage points in four recent polls.

McMahon, who is using her personal fortune to underwrite her first campaign for elective office, reacted more aggressively to a days-old Blumenthal ad that criticized her business practices and described her as open to cutting the minimum wage. She turned to Blumenthal and said, “That’s a lie, and you know it’s a lie.”

During a press conference last week, McMahon failed to clearly stake a position on reducing the minimum wage, though she later clarified she would not support a reduction. Despite that statement, Blumenthal aired an ad the next day insisting she still was open to cutting the $7.25 federal minimum wage.

The ad also claimed that WWE accepted $10 million in tax credits, then cut jobs. McMahon acknowledged some layoffs, but insisted that the credits helped the company add 52 jobs in its digital media division.

“Layoffs are hard. They are really tough to do,” McMahon said. But she said they ultimately made the company healthier and positioned it grow again.

The candidates were quizzed by reporters from Fox and the debate’s co-sponsor, The Courant, on issues that included Afghanistan, the bailout and how to cut the size of the federal government. They also answered questions from each other and the public.

The first question was posed by a viewer from Ellington, who asked how Blumenthal could work to spark the economy, given his lifetime in government; McMahon was asked how she could work in Washington, given her lifetime in business.

Blumenthal instantly reverted to a campaign talking point: He has stood up and fought for Connecticut in 20 years as attorney general. He used the word “fight” at least four times in the opening seconds.

He contrasted his support for extending the Bush-era tax cuts for the middle class with McMahon’s insistence on an “all-or-nothing” bill that would preserve the cuts for everyone or no one.

Blumenthal called that position akin to holding middle-class tax relief hostage to a bill that also would bring relief to the nation’s richest two or three percent of taxpayers.

“That’s just not true, and he knows it,” McMahon said.

But McMahon did take that position weeks ago during a press conference in New Haven. When asked about the issue last week, she refused to commit to voting for a stand-alone bill affecting the middle class.

During the debate, McMahon said that the tax cuts should be extended for everyone, so not to crimp the growth of small businesses.

“The government doesn’t know how to create jobs,” she said.

Blumenthal returned to middle-class tax relief, an issue on which congressional Democrats and Republicans deadlocked last week, before they adjourned to return home and campaign.

“I am the only candidate here who would vote immediately for a middle-class tax cut,” he said.

He faulted the Democratic congressional leadership for adjourning without voting on an extension of the tax cuts. He also insisted he would have voted against the Troubled Asset Relief Program, though his opposition has grown more outspoken in recent months.

McMahon supported the TARP, saying it was necessary to stabilize the economy.

Blumenthal made better use of McMahon’s gaffe last week over the minimum wage than McMahon did of Blumenthal’s misstatements about Vietnam. He repeatedly worked the minimum wage into several answers about the economy and taxes.

Last week, McMahon struggled to answer questions about the minimum wage, ending a press conference without clearly saying if she would freeze, reduce or repeal the minimum wage, though she quickly clarified that she would not consider a reduction or repeal.

Each candidate expressed support for the death penalty, an issue in the news as the first trial of a defendant in the Cheshire home invasion case, which left a mother and two daughters dead, awaits a verdict. Blumenthal opposed capital punishment as a legislator, but he said he has consistently been a supporter since his first race for attorney general in 1990.

Afforded an opportunity to question each other, Blumenthal asked McMahon why the WWE makes the toys it markets in China and Pakistan.

“We have high labor costs, high energy costs,” McMahon replied. “All of these things are what are contributing to driving prices up in our country.”

Blumenthal said McMahon is accountable for the decision to go off shore.

McMahon asked Blumenthal to explain how jobs are created.

Blumenthal replied that jobs are created in response to a demand for services or products.

“I know about how government can help preserve jobs, and I want programs that provide more capital for small businesses, better tax policies,” he said.

“Government, government, government,” McMahon replied. “Government does not create jobs.”

McMahon used humor to convey her displeasure with gibes about her wealth from Blumenthal, a fellow Greenwich resident whose household assets range as high as $124 million, thanks primarily to his marriage to the former Cynthia Malkin.

McMahon made a reference to the Malkin family’s real-estate holdings, which include a major share in a certain New York landmark. She offered Blumenthal a deal: “I won’t let you count my money, and I won’t talk about the fact that your family owns the Empire State Building.”

 

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Mark Pazniokas

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Is the state’s vaccine rollout leaving behind Black and Latino residents?
by Jacqueline Rabe Thomas, Kasturi Pananjady and Jenna Carlesso

Rolling out the COVID vaccine to older residents first means it's more likely to go to white residents first.

Education is the cornerstone of democracy
by John J. Petillo

The events of January 6 represent an inflection point for our democracy and, in truth, for our concept of civil society. Much has already been written about the political and cultural tides that swept our nation toward these events —and a real understanding of their significance will not be possible for some time, in part because the reactions and responses to these events are still unfolding as I write.

A rebuttal to ‘A call to save arms’
by Tyler David Gavitt

A response to "A call to save arms: is vaccination really the solution?" published January 25: The aforementioned article, written by Genevieve Diamant, stands to do potentially significant damage to the efforts by the citizens and government of the State of Connecticut to bring under control the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Holocaust, history and today’s politics
by Avinoam Patt and Laura Hilton

On January 6 the world watched as domestic terrorists stormed the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, DC.  The pictures seared into our memories of this day are replete with symbols of hatred, racism, and extremism: The Confederate battle flag, the white power hand gesture, and the gallows erected near the Capitol reflecting pool. What many may not have noticed within this sea of white supremacy was the prominence of anti-Semitic images.

Sticker shock
by Eric W. Kuhn

It would award a modest amount to families making less than $203k in the first year of the program, ramping up to as much as $1,800 in year four. On a sliding scale, the money would also go to families making up to $682,000 a year. Really? That's 8.7 times the median household income in America.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion Education is the cornerstone of democracy
by John J. Petillo

The events of January 6 represent an inflection point for our democracy and, in truth, for our concept of civil society. Much has already been written about the political and cultural tides that swept our nation toward these events —and a real understanding of their significance will not be possible for some time, in part because the reactions and responses to these events are still unfolding as I write.

Opinion A rebuttal to ‘A call to save arms’
by Tyler David Gavitt

A response to "A call to save arms: is vaccination really the solution?" published January 25: The aforementioned article, written by Genevieve Diamant, stands to do potentially significant damage to the efforts by the citizens and government of the State of Connecticut to bring under control the COVID-19 pandemic.

Opinion The Holocaust, history and today’s politics
by Avinoam Patt and Laura Hilton

On January 6 the world watched as domestic terrorists stormed the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, DC.  The pictures seared into our memories of this day are replete with symbols of hatred, racism, and extremism: The Confederate battle flag, the white power hand gesture, and the gallows erected near the Capitol reflecting pool. What many may not have noticed within this sea of white supremacy was the prominence of anti-Semitic images.

Opinion Sticker shock
by Eric W. Kuhn

It would award a modest amount to families making less than $203k in the first year of the program, ramping up to as much as $1,800 in year four. On a sliding scale, the money would also go to families making up to $682,000 a year. Really? That's 8.7 times the median household income in America.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO