Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Money
  • Election 2020
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Money
    Election 2020
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

Justice Department won’t oppose DOMA challenge by state couples

  • by Mark Pazniokas
  • February 23, 2011
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

A lawsuit filed in Connecticut is central to the Obama administration’s surprise decision Wednesday to end its defense of a federal law that denies a range of benefits to same-sex couples by defining marriage as being between a man and woman.

Attorney General Eric Holder announced that the Department of Justice will not defend against a challenge of the Defense of Marriage Act filed last fall in Connecticut on behalf of several plaintiffs, including Joanne Pedersen and Ann Meitzen of Waterford.

In a letter to House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, Holder said recently filed lawsuits in Connecticut and New York have caused President Obama and the Justice Department, which had been defending DOMA, “to conduct a new examination.”

Pedersen is the named plaintiff in the Connecticut case.

“My reaction as I am reading this, I am sort of flabbergasted and actually very delighted,” said Meitzen, reached by phone as she was reading about Holder’s decision. “It’s fabulous, just fabulous. I had literally no idea.”

“I was a little shocked and amazed that it happened this way,” Pedersen said. “I just have my fingers crossed that it goes through and everybody agrees.”

That is unlikely.

Lee Swislow, the executive director of GLAD, the Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, which filed the suit on the couple’s behalf, said Holder’s decision is a significant boost, but the litigation is almost certain to continue.

Either branch of Congress can elect to defend the law, which was passed in 1996 and denies to married same-sex couples many pension and federal health benefits available to married men and women.

“We expect at least one of those chambers will,” she said.

The Republican-controlled House is seen as the more likely chamber to come to the defense of DOMA. Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, called Holder’s action “a transparent attempt to shirk the [Justice] Department’s duty to defend the laws passed by Congress.”

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, applauded the decision.

“This decision is not only legally correct, but will also add momentum to efforts in Congress to repeal this unfair and discriminatory law,” Blumenthal said.

Swislow said Holder’s decision reflects a conclusion by Justice Department lawyers that elements of the law denhying same-sex couples federal benefits are unconstitutional when measured against a more rigorous standard of proof than previously employed by the government.

Previous cases involving DOMA were brought in jurisdictions with binding U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals precedents stating that laws “singling out people based on sexual orientation, as DOMA does, are constitutional if there is a rational basis for their enactment,” Holder wrote in his letter.

With no binding precedents in the 2nd Circuit, which includes Connecticut and New York, the law must meet a  “heightened scrutiny” test, which is more rigorous than “a rational basis,” Swislow said.”So the burden of proof shifts from us to them,” she said.

“In these cases,” Holder wrote of the Connecticut and New York lawsuits, “the Administration faces for the first time the question of whether laws regarding sexual orientation are subject to the more permissive standard of review or whether a more rigorous standard, under which laws targeting minority groups with a history of discrimination are viewed with suspicion by the courts, should apply.”

“After careful consideration, including a review of my recommendation, the President has concluded that given a number of factors, including a documented history of discrimination, classifications based on sexual orientation should be subject to a more heightened standard of scrutiny,” Holder wrote.

When subjected to that standard, the law is unconstitutional, Holder wrote. Swislow said the administration effectively is saying the the burden is now heavier for those who wish to defend the law as constitutional.

“Their agreement with that principle is not determinative,” Swislow said. “But it is a very powerful statement by some very well-respected and smart attorneys, so we think that’s incredibly helpful to our case.”

Swislow said she expects the question will be resolved by U.S. Supreme Court.

Pedersen and Meitzen became plaintiffs after Pedersen filled out an online survey.

“GLAD was doing a survey asking how does DOMA affect you? I explained how it affects me,” Pedersen said.

Pedersen is retired after a 30-year career as a civilian employee of the U.S. Navy. But Meitzen, whom she married soon after gay marriage was legalized in 2008, continues to work, despite a chronic lung condition.

“When she retires, she loses her medical benefits,” Pedersen said. If Pedersen was married to a man, her husband would be covered by her federal health benefits, but DOMA bars Meitzen from spousal coverage.

“We got married as soon as we could under the law, yet the federal government still treats us like second-class citizens,” Pedersen said.

Pedersen and Meitzen had a commitment ceremony in 2004, inviting 120 people to a party in their backyard. They further formalized the relationship in 2007, getting recognized in a civil union.

In 2008, once same-sex marriage was legalized by a Connecticut Supreme Court decision, they got married in their living room in front of a dozen witnesses.

Unless DOMA is repealed or struck down, their marriage is the same as their civil union – unrecognized by the federal government.

“The federal government still unmarries you,” Swislow said.

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Mark Pazniokas

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Connecticut’s $90M lobbying industry has a new player: former Speaker Joe Aresimowicz
by Mark Pazniokas

Former House Speaker Joe Aresimowicz is becoming a lobbyist, but a revolving-door law limits him for a year.

Spiking tax revenue will wipe out state budget deficit, analysts say
by Keith M. Phaneuf

Projected state revenues skyrocketed by $1.7 billion Friday, positioning officials to balance the next state budget without tax hikes.

Judge approves shorter sentence for convicted murderer turned prison mentor
by Kelan Lyons

The DOC could start screening Clyde Meikle in July for discharge to a halfway house.

Without vocal dissent, Senate confirms Justice Andrew McDonald
by Mark Pazniokas

The state Senate acted quickly Friday to confirm Andrew J. McDonald to a second term on the Supreme Court.

Funding to fix CT’s roads and bridges is drying up, and officials don’t have a solution
by Keith M. Phaneuf and Kasturi Pananjady

Connecticut's transportation building program is on a financial diet after a five-year ramp-up after lawmakers rejected tolls.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion Evidence not clear that Trump incited Capitol destruction
by Alan Calandro

Defending President Donald Trump is not popular and I have no interest in writing this other than adherence to truth. Recognizing the truth (if we can find it, which is not always possible of course) should make us be able to come together around that and move on with a common understanding.

Opinion Securing our nuclear legacy: An open letter to President-elect Joe Biden
by Erik Assadourian

Dear President-elect Biden: As you noted in a tweet shortly after protestors stormed the Capitol on Wednesday, “Today is a reminder, a painful one, that democracy is fragile.” Indeed it is. And so are nation-states.

Opinion Last votes of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and others
by Gary A. Franks

Finally, the election season is over. The historic elections we saw in this cycle were intriguing. The runoff elections for the U.S. Senate in Georgia put a cap on the campaign season. For many people this could be described as a COVID-19 election. I would argue that this was an election influenced by a pandemic but determined by the killing of unarmed Black people with no adequate justice for the Black community.

Opinion Not just environmental problem; Killingly plant is a great target
by Joel Gordes

In 1990, I was one of five legislators to introduce the first climate change legislation that became PA 90-219, An Act Considering Climate Change, the most popular bill of that session. Back then I considered climate change a national security issue… and I still do.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO