Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Money
  • Election 2020
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Money
    Election 2020
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

DSS picks medical home pay plan many advocates oppose

  • by Arielle Levin Becker
  • November 2, 2011
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

The state Department of Social Services is preparing to roll out its final plan to encourage the use of a form of primary care known as a medical home in Medicaid, with a four-part method for making extra payments to health care providers who taken on additional responsibilities for keeping their patients healthy.

The plan has drawn skepticism from patient advocates, who want the department to instead pay providers a monthly fee for each Medicaid patient in their practice, which advocates say will make the providers more likely to participate and improve patient care.

The system DSS described in a draft document this week does not use that method, but Mark Schaefer, the department’s director of medical care administration, said that in the future, Medicaid could move toward the approach the advocates favor. He said he, too, prefers the monthly payment approach, but did not believe it would be possible to implement by Jan. 1, when the medical home program is set to begin.

At issue in the dispute is the design of a program aimed at getting primary care providers in Medicaid to embrace a popular but sparsely used concept, one that requires additional time and infrastructure but, supporters say, could significantly improve patient care and reduce costs.

In a practice that serves as a medical home, doctors and other health care providers play a more active role in monitoring patients’ health, often using electronic medical records to keep track of which patients need help managing their conditions and offering extended hours so patients can get care when they need it. Practices that serve as medical homes also typically allow patients to communicate by phone or email, educate patients about managing their conditions and keep track of care patients get from other providers.

Multiple groups offer standards for medical homes. DSS is expected to require practices to meet the requirements of the National Committee for Quality Assurance, the most commonly cited accrediting organization. Practices would also have to meet additional requirements set by DSS, including meeting all federal requirements for child screening and treatment, participating in the state’s Medicaid smoking cessation initiative, and committing to decrease racial and ethnic health disparities.

Although the medical home concept has gained popularity in recent years and is being embraced by public and private insurers, few medical practices in the state meet the requirements. To encourage practices to become medical homes, and to support the added costs of serving as one, DSS plans to give medical home providers increased payments.

The method for doing so has been a matter of dispute.

The model DSS described in its draft document, and during a meeting Wednesday, uses a hybrid approach, with four ways providers can get paid. Providers serving as medical homes would get an increase in the fees they usually get for patient care. They would also be eligible for two types of performance-based payments, paid annually and based on practices’ ability to coordinate care, meet quality targets and improve their performance from year to year.

Practices that don’t yet meet the medical home standards could also qualify for increased fees if they have a plan to become medical homes, and independent practices with five or fewer primary care practitioners could receive lump-sum start-up payments while they move toward meeting the medical home standards. Those that don’t meet the standards in 24 months would have to repay the money.

Patient advocates have criticized the department’s approach, particularly the plan to increase the fees providers already receive. Because providers are currently paid when patients come in for visits or procedures, but not when they’re healthy, tying additional money to the existing system would reinforce incentives for providers to see patients in their offices and wouldn’t encourage the use of alternative approaches, like using email or phone to reach patients, advocates say.

They say that paying a monthly fee for each patient–on top of the usual patient care fees–would give providers a reliable source of income that they could use to hire care coordinators or make other investments to improve patient care.

On Wednesday, Schaefer said he also liked the monthly payment system.

“I’ve had a preference for a while for a monthly per member, per month approach,” he said.

But Schaefer added that he didn’t think the department would be able to set up a program with monthly fees by January, when the medical home program is to begin. He noted that the department has also been working to restructure the entire Medicaid program, which has more than 550,000 clients, moving the HUSKY program for low-income children and their parents out of managed care while moving it and the state’s other Medicaid programs into a new administrative system that is to start Jan. 1.

Schaefer said a monthly payment system would add layers of complexity that he did not think the department’s medical care administration team could adequately manage. That system would also require the department to get federal approval through a state plan amendment, Schaefer said, which would have been difficult within the resources the department had.

Schaefer said increasing the usual fees paid to providers was a good place to start, and that the program could evolve once it starts. He noted that the department intends to introduce monthly fees for complex care next year, and would also examine it for routine care.

But Sheldon Toubman, an attorney with the New Haven Legal Assistance Association who favors the monthly fee model, questioned the feasibility of starting with one model, then moving to another. Providers in Medicaid are already paid low rates, he said, and if the state begins raising their fees, it will be hard to remove it later on. And he disagreed that the timing made it impossible to develop a monthly payment system.

“We’ve gone through so many changes in HUSKY, why would we do all the work to set up this cockamamie system only to change it a year later?” he said.

Toubman noted that most other states that use medical homes in Medicaid use monthly payments, as will a recently announced federal program. When Toubman asked during a recent conference call why the federal program uses monthly fees rather than adding on to existing fees, Dr. Richard Baron, director of the seamless care models group at the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ Innovation Center, said that most core functions of primary care are not delivered during office visits.

“So we didn’t want to develop a system that pushed people further in the direction of visit-based care and expect them to rely on visits as the way that they generated revenue for their practices,” Baron said.

“I am just hopeful that other policymakers will be willing to get involved and say this is not the way to go, this doesn’t make sense,” Toubman said Wednesday.

The department is expected to release the finalized details of the design in a policy transmittal next week.

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Arielle Levin Becker

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Connecticut’s $90M lobbying industry has a new player: former Speaker Joe Aresimowicz
by Mark Pazniokas

Former House Speaker Joe Aresimowicz is becoming a lobbyist, but a revolving-door law limits him for a year.

Spiking tax revenue will wipe out state budget deficit, analysts say
by Keith M. Phaneuf

Projected state revenues skyrocketed by $1.7 billion Friday, positioning officials to balance the next state budget without tax hikes.

Judge approves shorter sentence for convicted murderer turned prison mentor
by Kelan Lyons

The DOC could start screening Clyde Meikle in July for discharge to a halfway house.

Without vocal dissent, Senate confirms Justice Andrew McDonald
by Mark Pazniokas

The state Senate acted quickly Friday to confirm Andrew J. McDonald to a second term on the Supreme Court.

Funding to fix CT’s roads and bridges is drying up, and officials don’t have a solution
by Keith M. Phaneuf and Kasturi Pananjady

Connecticut's transportation building program is on a financial diet after a five-year ramp-up after lawmakers rejected tolls.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion Evidence not clear that Trump incited Capitol destruction
by Alan Calandro

Defending President Donald Trump is not popular and I have no interest in writing this other than adherence to truth. Recognizing the truth (if we can find it, which is not always possible of course) should make us be able to come together around that and move on with a common understanding.

Opinion Securing our nuclear legacy: An open letter to President-elect Joe Biden
by Erik Assadourian

Dear President-elect Biden: As you noted in a tweet shortly after protestors stormed the Capitol on Wednesday, “Today is a reminder, a painful one, that democracy is fragile.” Indeed it is. And so are nation-states.

Opinion Last votes of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and others
by Gary A. Franks

Finally, the election season is over. The historic elections we saw in this cycle were intriguing. The runoff elections for the U.S. Senate in Georgia put a cap on the campaign season. For many people this could be described as a COVID-19 election. I would argue that this was an election influenced by a pandemic but determined by the killing of unarmed Black people with no adequate justice for the Black community.

Opinion Not just environmental problem; Killingly plant is a great target
by Joel Gordes

In 1990, I was one of five legislators to introduce the first climate change legislation that became PA 90-219, An Act Considering Climate Change, the most popular bill of that session. Back then I considered climate change a national security issue… and I still do.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO