Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

Senate blocks effort to remove judges’ pay from political debates

  • by Keith M. Phaneuf
  • May 3, 2012
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

The Senate overwhelmingly stymied a bid Thursday by Connecticut’s judges to remove their salaries from political debate, dramatically scaling back a measure creating a new judicial compensation study panel.

The bill, which now heads to the House of Representatives, still would ensure that any pay raises the panel endorses for judges would be included in the governor’s annual budget proposal sent to the legislature.

But under an earlier version of the measure, any raises recommended by the panel would have taken effect automatically — unless the legislature had acted to reject them.

Sen. Eric Coleman, D-Bloomfield, co-chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said that while he appreciates judges’ concerns about compensation, senators agreed that voting on judicial salaries is an important legislative responsibility.

“It was important to me, and it was important to many other senators on both sides of the aisle,” he said.

“We have a unique role as a legislature to control the power of the purse,” said Sen. John A. Kissel of Enfield, the ranking Republican senator on the Judiciary Committee. “When it comes to the budget, it is our job to prioritize.”

After working with the Judicial Branch, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s office proposed a bill that would have created a nine-member commission, appointed by the governor, legislative leaders and the chief justice, with the sole job of addressing judicial compensation.

Starting in January 2013 and every four years thereafter, the panel would have recommended compensation levels for judges and magistrates after weighing: inflation and other economic factors; judicial compensation in other states and in the federal courts; earnings by attorneys in the public and private sectors; compensation for nonjudicial state employees; and the state’s overall fiscal situation.

Any raises proposed by the group would have taken effect in July of the same year they were recommended — unless lawmakers took specific action to reject or otherwise change them.

The Senate amendment adopted Thursday retains the commission, adds two additional seats for legislative leaders but scraps the automatic approval in the absence of legislative action. In its place, it stipulates that the study panel’s proposals must be forwarded to the governor’s budget office and to the General Assembly for review.

“The amendment was the result of collaboration with the governor’s office,” Malloy spokesman Andrew Doba said Thursday. “The Governor fully supports the bill as amended, and thanks the legislators who worked with his office and the Judicial Branch to arrive at a workable and substantial process for considering judicial compensation questions.”

“The bill creates a fair, objective and transparent process by which judges’ salaries may be periodically reviewed,” Chief Justice Chase Rogers wrote in a statement Thursday. “The bill is now in the House of Representatives and I am hopeful that it will be acted upon favorably. “

State judges, whose pay last increased in 2007 with a 5.5 percent bump, have no fixed schedule or system for raises, which are granted at the discretion of the General Assembly.

Connecticut’s judges have been arguing since then that their salaries lag behind those of attorneys in the private sector and those of judges in other states.

The legislature already receives annual recommendations on compensation for judges, legislators and the governor and other constitutional officers from the Commission on Compensation for Elected State Officials and Judges. That panel has authority only to make recommendations. And critics argue that recommendations for pay increases routinely are set aside for political reasons, particularly during tough fiscal times.

An analysis prepared by the National Center for State Courts showed that Connecticut’s annual pay for Superior Court judges, $146,780, ranked 14th highest among all states at the start of this fiscsal year. But once that pay was adjusted to reflect Connecticut’s relatively high cost of living, the ranking fell to 45th.

The $152,637 annual salary for Connecticut’s Appellate Court judges ranked 11th nationwide and the $162,520 yearly pay for Supreme Court justices was 17th highest. Rankings adjusted for regional cost-of-living factors were not available for those higher-level courts.

Coleman said he appreciates Rogers’ “legitimate advocacy on behalf of the Judicial Branch” and noted that Connecticut’s compensation does rank behind that of most other states.

But the Bloomfield senator added that many legislators also note there are more than 200 people who applied to the state’s Judicial Selection Commission and have been approved for potential appointment to the bench.

“There seems to be no shortage of people interested in becoming judges,” he said.

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Keith M. Phaneuf

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Why it took days for one CVS store in CT to stop vaccinating New Yorkers
by Dave Altimari

By the time state officials arrived at a Waterford CVS on Feb. 4 to investigate reports that New Yorkers were getting the COVID-19 vaccine, the […]

From UHart faculty: All Hawks deserve our support
by Amanda Freeman, Katharine Owens and Rachel Walker

Last week college sports fans in Connecticut were roiled by some startling news. The University of Hartford has been privately considering a move from NCAA Division I to Division III. Grappling with the financial implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, the University commissioned a “feasibility study” from the consulting company CarrSports. The confidential report concluded that the “current Division I-funding model is not viable and cannot achieve the goal of becoming more self-sustaining.”

Lessons learned: Education is not enough to combat anti-vaccine propaganda
by Kerri M. Raissian and Jody Terranova

The Connecticut House of Representatives just passed legislation to end the religious exemption for the school vaccination requirement ( HB6423).  The Connecticut state Senate must act quickly to do the same.  If passed, Connecticut would require medically able school children to receive vaccines as recommended by the CDC.

Biden ought not overuse the term ‘infrastructure’
by Eric W. Kuhn

President Joe Biden's redefinition of the word "bipartisan" is wise, even necessary. Measures that have majority support among regular folks throughout the country-- say, universal background checks for firearms purchases-- have "bipartisan" support because lots of citizens of both major parties approve: that makes sense.

Please let restaurants and bars recover from the pandemic. Oppose HB 6502
by Robert D’Eliseo and Don Mancini

For the first time in almost a year, we can see a light at the end of the tunnel of the COVID-19 pandemic. But that does not mean we are out of the tunnel yet – and these coming months will be critical for the recovery. That is why this is not the time for the Connecticut General Assembly to push the polystyrene ban (HB 6502) they seem on track toward passing.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion From UHart faculty: All Hawks deserve our support
by Amanda Freeman, Katharine Owens and Rachel Walker

Last week college sports fans in Connecticut were roiled by some startling news. The University of Hartford has been privately considering a move from NCAA Division I to Division III. Grappling with the financial implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, the University commissioned a “feasibility study” from the consulting company CarrSports. The confidential report concluded that the “current Division I-funding model is not viable and cannot achieve the goal of becoming more self-sustaining.”

Opinion Lessons learned: Education is not enough to combat anti-vaccine propaganda
by Kerri M. Raissian and Jody Terranova

The Connecticut House of Representatives just passed legislation to end the religious exemption for the school vaccination requirement ( HB6423).  The Connecticut state Senate must act quickly to do the same.  If passed, Connecticut would require medically able school children to receive vaccines as recommended by the CDC.

Opinion Biden ought not overuse the term ‘infrastructure’
by Eric W. Kuhn

President Joe Biden's redefinition of the word "bipartisan" is wise, even necessary. Measures that have majority support among regular folks throughout the country-- say, universal background checks for firearms purchases-- have "bipartisan" support because lots of citizens of both major parties approve: that makes sense.

Opinion Please let restaurants and bars recover from the pandemic. Oppose HB 6502
by Robert D’Eliseo and Don Mancini

For the first time in almost a year, we can see a light at the end of the tunnel of the COVID-19 pandemic. But that does not mean we are out of the tunnel yet – and these coming months will be critical for the recovery. That is why this is not the time for the Connecticut General Assembly to push the polystyrene ban (HB 6502) they seem on track toward passing.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s […]

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is […]

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO