Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

GMO labeling advocates celebrate, and turn focus to other states

  • by Arielle Levin Becker
  • June 3, 2013
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

Shortly after the bill they endorsed got pulled “out of the legislative graveyard,” the grass-roots network of advocates pushing for labels on genetically engineered food gathered to cheer about it Monday.

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy showed up and congratulated them. But, characteristically, he pointed to the next thing on the agenda.

“You better go win in some other states right now,” Malloy told the crowd.

Advocates lauded the bill’s passage in the Senate Saturday and the House Monday as a groundbreaking win. But under its terms, the requirement that food containing genetically modified organisms be labeled won’t occur until a “trigger” is met: Four other states in the Northeast with a population of 20 million must pass a similar law, and one of those four must border Connecticut.

Tara Cook-Littman, a Fairfield food blogger who has led the GMO Free Connecticut effort, said she’s not worried.

“To those concerned about the trigger clause, we have nothing to fear,” she told advocates. “The Connecticut GMO labeling law will be a catalyst for states throughout the country to join us.” 

There are similar bills pending in Pennsylvania, Maine and Massachusetts, and several “GMO labeling warriors,” as Cook-Littman called them, said they were hopeful that their states would join Connecticut.

The Washington-based Center for Food Safety called the bill “precedent setting,” but criticized the trigger provision. The group’s executive director, Andrew Kimbrell, said in a statement that the trigger “unnecessarily puts on hold what consumers and lawmakers have already validated as important legislation.”

The group said 64 countries require labeling of genetically engineered foods, and said recently introduced federal legislation would also call for nationwide labeling.

Opponents of the measure have said that labeling could confuse consumers, and that it could hurt Connecticut’s reputation with the biotechnology industry, something leaders have looked to as a source for jobs.

Unexpected celebration

The gathering, held in a room down the hall from the Senate chamber at the state Capitol, was part celebration, part campaign rally, part homage to the power of grass-roots campaigning and bipartisanship, with a little bit of reassurance in the mix.

A week ago, Cook-Littman said, she wouldn’t have predicted there would be reason to celebrate with state leaders.

Malloy said he knew better.

“You might be surprised that you got to this day,” he the crowd. “I’m not. I saw it coming.”

The state Senate passed a bill that anti-GMO advocates supported last month, calling for labeling in 2016 or sooner if other states passed similar measures.

But Malloy and House Speaker J. Brendan Sharkey, D-Hamden, worried that Connecticut could end up the only state with such a requirement, potentially driving up food prices.

A more restrictive version of the bill passed the House May 24. It would have exempted nearly all local food producers, and would only have taken effect if New York and fourth other states with a total population of 25 million passed similar measures.

Some supporters in the legislature were content to leave it there, figuring they had a foot in the door and could amend the proposal later, Rep. Phil Miller-D-Essex, told the crowd. But, he noted, advocates weren’t. “All of you said, ‘No, we still have eight or nine days to the session, let’s advocate to do it right,’” he said.

Advocates pushed, with thousands of phone calls.

On Saturday, the Senate passed a new compromise, minimizing the growers exempt from the requirements and reducing the requirements for the trigger. The House followed suit Monday.

Cook-Littman praised the two Senate leaders, President Pro Tem Donald E. Williams, Jr., a Democrat from Brooklyn, and Minority Leader John McKinney, a Republican from Fairfield, for pulling the bill “out of the legislative graveyard,” twice.

Bipartisanship

The event gave leaders a chance to bask in a moment of bipartisanship and highlight what they called the power of the grass-roots effort.

“In this day and age, there is so much talk and cynicism about politics and about government, where so many people who want change say, ‘Oh heck, what’s the use? They’re not listening anyway,’” said House Minority Leader Lawrence F. Cafero, Jr., R-Norwalk. “I want to congratulate all of you because you have proven them wrong. It matters when you care. It matters when you fight, and you’ve made a difference.”

“Don’t stop here,” he urged them. “Don’t stop with just this issue.”

Sharkey alluded to the previous regard the bill’s advocates had for him when he referenced his “alter ego” while pulling from a paper shopping bag a Darth Vader helmet. It’s now returning to the bag, he assured his audience.

He said the concerns about the previous version of the bill were legitimate, but that by working together, leaders came up with a bill that protects consumers and the economy. And he likened the bipartisan process behind the proposal to one earlier in the year that produced legislation addressing gun violence, mental health and school safety, inspired by the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

McKinney, meanwhile, made a point to single out former Rep. Richard Roy, who he described as the first member of the legislature in his memory to introduce a bill about genetically modified foods.

And he thanked the crowd. “Your hard work, your advocacy is the reason this bill is being signed by the governor,” he said.

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Arielle Levin Becker

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Why an epidemiologist thinks Connecticut has its COVID vaccine priorities backwards
by Kasturi Pananjady

By rolling out COVID vaccine through an age-based process, the state will effectively de-prioritize younger adults with co-morbidities.

Connecticut has to stop phoning in evictions
by Nathan Leys, Darren Pruslow, Shelley White and Sally Zanger

In early October, a woman sent a desperate fax to the housing court handling her case. “I’ve been trying to reach someone since 9/29/20 calling daily. I had a remote hearing scheduled for 10/1/20 I signed up for teams [the Judicial Branch’s remote courtroom software] and was unable to figure out how to find my case. I tried emailing the 2 names at the bottom of my notice for instructions, but the email came back not delivered.” She was too late. At her hearing four days before, the judge had already entered judgment against her.

CT elected officials choosing politics over Danbury students
by The L.E.A.D. Executive Board

Last month in his executive budget, Gov. Ned Lamont proposed funding for an Open Choice Program that would bus 50 elementary school children out of Danbury to receive an education. At the same time, he excluded Danbury Prospect Charter School from his budget. This decision was a severe disappointment to all who have fought hard to bring the charter school to Danbury. What’s worse, it clearly signals the intentions of the Danbury Democratic delegation: to ignore the demands of Black and brown constituents who have spent years advocating for Danbury Prospect.

Will electricity provide the promised fix?
by Robert Orr

Our new president speaks passionately about how carbon-free electricity will fix climate change. But will it? For sure, this past year dropped a sledgehammer of awareness for an environmental fragility that heretofore escaped our attention. Repeated hurricanes, tornados, droughts, fires, and the alarming outcomes of virus(es) rivet our attention. Something’s not right. Of course, they’re […]

Facts, not fear, should guide Connecticut’s cannabis future
by Paul Armentano

Here’s an important fact. Some two-thirds of Americans – including majorities of Democrats, Independents, and Republicans – say that the adult use of marijuana ought to be legal. That’s according to nationwide surveys by Gallup, Pew, and other respected pollsters. In Connecticut, 63 percent of residents “support the legalization of recreational marijuana,” according to polling data compiled by Sacred Heart University and the Hartford Courant.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion Connecticut has to stop phoning in evictions
by Nathan Leys, Darren Pruslow, Shelley White and Sally Zanger

In early October, a woman sent a desperate fax to the housing court handling her case. “I’ve been trying to reach someone since 9/29/20 calling daily. I had a remote hearing scheduled for 10/1/20 I signed up for teams [the Judicial Branch’s remote courtroom software] and was unable to figure out how to find my case. I tried emailing the 2 names at the bottom of my notice for instructions, but the email came back not delivered.” She was too late. At her hearing four days before, the judge had already entered judgment against her.

Opinion CT elected officials choosing politics over Danbury students
by The L.E.A.D. Executive Board

Last month in his executive budget, Gov. Ned Lamont proposed funding for an Open Choice Program that would bus 50 elementary school children out of Danbury to receive an education. At the same time, he excluded Danbury Prospect Charter School from his budget. This decision was a severe disappointment to all who have fought hard to bring the charter school to Danbury. What’s worse, it clearly signals the intentions of the Danbury Democratic delegation: to ignore the demands of Black and brown constituents who have spent years advocating for Danbury Prospect.

Opinion Will electricity provide the promised fix?
by Robert Orr

Our new president speaks passionately about how carbon-free electricity will fix climate change. But will it? For sure, this past year dropped a sledgehammer of awareness for an environmental fragility that heretofore escaped our attention. Repeated hurricanes, tornados, droughts, fires, and the alarming outcomes of virus(es) rivet our attention. Something’s not right. Of course, they’re […]

Opinion Facts, not fear, should guide Connecticut’s cannabis future
by Paul Armentano

Here’s an important fact. Some two-thirds of Americans – including majorities of Democrats, Independents, and Republicans – say that the adult use of marijuana ought to be legal. That’s according to nationwide surveys by Gallup, Pew, and other respected pollsters. In Connecticut, 63 percent of residents “support the legalization of recreational marijuana,” according to polling data compiled by Sacred Heart University and the Hartford Courant.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO