Attorney General William Tong Credit: Clarice Silber / CTMirror.org

Connecticut will join other states in suing to block a new Trump administration mandate that bars federal family-planning money from going to health care groups that offer abortion referrals.

Attorney General William Tong said he would take “swift legal action” to preserve the federal funding for organizations like Planned Parenthood. Officials in Washington state and Oregon also have pledged to sue the Trump administration over the decision.

The so-called “gag rule,” announced Friday, would create barriers for women, especially women of color and low-income women, who are seeking abortions. It would prohibit health care providers who receive federal money known as Title X funding from referring patients to abortion clinics.

The providers will still be able to perform abortions, but would have to do so in separate facilities and abide by the requirement that they not refer patients to those facilities. 

“Women have a right to safe, affordable reproductive health care free from political interference,” Tong said. “This action seeks to push a politically-motivated, anti-choice agenda on millions of individuals who rely on the Title X program for access to birth control and safe reproductive health care.”

In Connecticut, at least 38,000 patients rely on that federal funding for access to services such as cancer screenings, testing and treatment for sexually transmitted diseases, and birth control. The bulk of those patients visit Planned Parenthood clinics throughout the state. Tong’s office could not say if there were other state health centers that receive Title X money.

For the most recent grant cycle, which runs from April 2018 through late March of this year, Planned Parenthood of Southern New England received $2.4 million in Title X funding, its president and CEO, Amanda Skinner, said. That represents about 7 percent of the group’s annual budget.

Skinner said Planned Parenthood, which will refuse future Title X money if the gag rule is upheld, won’t turn away patients who cannot afford to pay. But the organization will vigorously pursue new streams of funding, she said, including tapping its donor base and seeking additional grants.

“We have seen repeated efforts on the part of this administration to dismantle programs or put into place programs that harm people who are already the most marginalized in our society,” Skinner said.

Sixty-one percent of patients who qualify for Title X funding at Planned Parenthood of Southern New England are people of color, she said. Twenty-nine percent are African American and 32 percent are Latino.

The Trump administration’s new mandate could direct federal family-planning money to faith-based, anti-abortion groups. Health centers will no longer have to counsel women on all reproductive options, including abortion.

There are about 25 religiously-based facilities, sometimes called crisis pregnancy centers, in Connecticut.

Christina Bennett, communications director for the Family Institute of Connecticut, which opposes abortion, said faith-based centers typically do their own fundraising, but she was heartened to hear about the new regulations.

“We’re grateful for whatever funds are re-directed away from Planned Parenthood because we not believe that taxpayer funds should go to organizations that offer services that many millions of Americans don’t support, as in abortions,” she said Tuesday.

Other groups have threatened legal action against the gag rule. Maine Family Planning, a leading women’s health care provider in Maine, announced last week that it would seek an injunction to prevent the edict from going into effect. The National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association also has said it would sue over the decision.

Jenna is The Connecticut Mirror’s health reporter, focusing on access, affordability, equity, and disparities. Before joining the CT Mirror, she was a reporter at The Hartford Courant for 10 years, where she covered government in the capital city with a focus on corruption, theft of taxpayer funds, and ethical violations. Her work has prompted reforms on health care and government oversight, helped erase medical debt for Connecticut residents, and led to the indictments of developers in a major state project. She is the recipient of a National Press Foundation award for a four-part series she co-authored on gaps in Connecticut’s elder care system.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. Reproductive health care? Is killing the unborn reproductive health care? What about the health care of the millions who die because their mothers choose death? Who speaks for the heath care rights for them?

Leave a comment