Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism
CT VIEWPOINTS -- opinions from around Connecticut

A voting system in which the majority rules

  • CT Viewpoints
  • by John Stoehr
  • April 19, 2018
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

In 48 states, the winner of the state’s popular vote is awarded all of its electoral votes. This is called winner-take-all.

According to four lawsuits in four states (two red, two blue), winner-take-all is unconstitutional. It violates the doctrine of one person, one vote, the suits allege. It also disenfranchises everyone who voted for a losing presidential candidate.

Plaintiffs want states to adapt what’s called proportional voting. That’s when a state’s electoral votes are awarded according to a candidate’s percentage of its popular vote.

But if the plaintiffs prevail, they may not achieve what they say they will. Proportional voting could give third-parties more power, making majority victories more unlikely. Given that the goal is getting around the anti-democratic Electoral College, such a battle might not be worth it. I think we should look to Maine for better options (more on that in moment).

Attorneys for the League of Latin American Citizens have filed suit in Massachusetts, California, Texas and South Carolina. They are asking federal judges to strike down winner-take-all in order to compel states to ensure the rights of free association, political expression and equal protection under the law. Luis Vera, an attorney for the group, told the Associated Press that voters who backed Democrat Hillary Clinton “essentially saw their votes disappear.”

“When that vote actually get to the Electoral College, it’s just thrown away. It’s counted simply to be thrown away.”

Vera’s group chose deliberately states red and blue to show that winner-take-all is bad for voters everywhere. He hopes the suits rise all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Vera believes a favorable ruling would push states to require “proportional distribution” of Electoral College votes. In that case, Donald Trump would have gotten 52 percent of Texas’ 38 electors while Clinton would have gotten 44 percent.

Critics say this is an matter for democratic deliberation, not the courts, and they are right about that. The problem is that none of the 48 winner-take-all states has incentive to change. Without incentive, we can expect silly arguments like this one from William Galvin, a Democrat overseeing Massachusetts’ elections. He said:

“When you start talking about what percentage did you win Ohio by, then you’re raising questions. This is a clearly a mathematical game.”

Yes, it is. It always is.

But that’s not why I’m skeptical.

Fighting winner-take-all suffers from the same problem facing the national popular vote effort (in which states form legally binding compacts to throw their electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote). As I argued last month, the winner of the national popular vote can still lose majorities in individual states, contravening the entire point of getting around the anti-democratic Electoral College.

Same with proportional voting. It could still result in  “winners” losing a state’s majority. More problematic is that divvying up shares of a state’s electoral votes could give third-parties more power by making it more unlikely that anyone would walk away with a majority victory. We already saw this happen in Michigan in 2016 even without proportional voting. Trump won 47 percent of the popular vote while Clinton, Gary Johnson and Jill Stein split the balance.

It would be different if the U.S. had a power-sharing system in which “winners” assemble governments with “losers.” But we don’t. As of now, the Steins of the world can only be spoilers. With proportional voting, they’d have more pointless power.

Everything in politics is theoretical until it’s tested. That’s why I’m interested to see how things pan out in Maine, which is experimenting with what I think is the most viable alternative to the anti-democratic Electoral College. In June, Maine will hold its first “ranked-choice” election. This is where voters rank their choices so that one candidate, major party or otherwise, will always win a majority of Maine’s voters.

As one expert told Politico:

“If Maine implements this, the momentum for adopting similar initiatives and legislation for ranked choice voting in other states is going to accelerate.”

We’ll see what happens, but ranked-choice, in theory, is the most practical solution to the Electoral College, because it does not seek to reform it. Instead, ranked-choice seeks to affirm a basic democratic principle: that the majority rules.

John Stoehr is a fellow at the Yale Journalism Initiative, an associate fellow at Yale’s Ezra Stiles College, a contributing writer for the Washington Monthly and a columnist for the New Haven Register.


CTViewpoints welcomes rebuttal or opposing views to this and all its commentaries. Read our guidelines and submit your commentary here

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Connecticut must protect vulnerable populations from biased and discriminatory healthcare practices
by William Smith

At a time of great uncertainty for the public health of our nation, the path to protect patients in Connecticut from unfair and even discriminatory healthcare rationing is clear. And it begins with turning away from European models that rely on controversial approaches to determine the price and value of new drugs.

Governor Lamont can negotiate a bold, equitable budget
by Callie Gale Heilmann

Last summer, after George Floyd’s murder sent a shock wave through our nation, people across Connecticut took to the streets to demand an end to systemic racism and inequality in our state. Residents in urban, rural, and suburban communities spoke in one unified voice demanding that in Connecticut, Black Lives Matter. This is a call for the liberation of Black folks -- for the removal of structural, institutional and economic violence that has thwarted the progress of Black people and the progress of our state.

Connecticut should have a one-house legislature — and fewer lawmakers
by Alan Calandro

In 2020, there were 35 out of 187 (19%) statehouse seats that were basically uncontested, which meant the election/balloting in these cases was a foregone conclusion. This is the norm, election after election. By definition then, we have too many statehouse seats in Connecticut.

Everybody in, especially those left out
by State Rep. Anne Hughes

In the wake of the spate of gun violence massacres, resuming again with deadly consequences, we are at a familiar crossroads: Do we revert to our usual, American individualized ‘othering,’, or do we reconcile that there is no ‘them’- only ‘us,’ that we refuse to claim? I’m campaigning to reframe the American ‘us’ from some of y’all to “ALL of us all!”

New Haven at a zoning crossroads
by Robert Orr

Unbeknown to many, most Connecticut zoning (and that of many other states) designates people of color to segregated areas. For that reason, zoning won the moniker, Exclusionary Zoning. Although there’s no mention of race or color in zoning regulations, clever dimensional requirements, put together in the 1950s, achieve exclusion.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion Connecticut must protect vulnerable populations from biased and discriminatory healthcare practices
by William Smith

At a time of great uncertainty for the public health of our nation, the path to protect patients in Connecticut from unfair and even discriminatory healthcare rationing is clear. And it begins with turning away from European models that rely on controversial approaches to determine the price and value of new drugs.

Opinion Governor Lamont can negotiate a bold, equitable budget
by Callie Gale Heilmann

Last summer, after George Floyd’s murder sent a shock wave through our nation, people across Connecticut took to the streets to demand an end to systemic racism and inequality in our state. Residents in urban, rural, and suburban communities spoke in one unified voice demanding that in Connecticut, Black Lives Matter. This is a call for the liberation of Black folks -- for the removal of structural, institutional and economic violence that has thwarted the progress of Black people and the progress of our state.

Opinion Connecticut should have a one-house legislature — and fewer lawmakers
by Alan Calandro

In 2020, there were 35 out of 187 (19%) statehouse seats that were basically uncontested, which meant the election/balloting in these cases was a foregone conclusion. This is the norm, election after election. By definition then, we have too many statehouse seats in Connecticut.

Opinion Everybody in, especially those left out
by State Rep. Anne Hughes

In the wake of the spate of gun violence massacres, resuming again with deadly consequences, we are at a familiar crossroads: Do we revert to our usual, American individualized ‘othering,’, or do we reconcile that there is no ‘them’- only ‘us,’ that we refuse to claim? I’m campaigning to reframe the American ‘us’ from some of y’all to “ALL of us all!”

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO