Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism
CT VIEWPOINTS -- opinions from around Connecticut

Opposition to aid in dying in Connecticut is an exercise in speculation

  • CT Viewpoints
  • by Stanley Greenberg
  • April 30, 2015
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

I would like to respond to the article titled “Physician-assisted suicide is not a choice issue,” which appeared in the March 25 edition of CT Mirror and was written by Lisa Blumberg.  In simplest terms, her letter denounces aid in dying, which is immediately evidence by her use of the term “physician-assisted suicide.”

I, however, strongly support aid in dying (also referred to as death with dignity) because I believe that it is a person’s right and that in well-defined circumstances, it is a compassionate and helpful option.  Just as important, it has no adverse effect on society nor on anyone who wants no part of it.

These assertions, of course, are contrary to the dire consequences described in Ms. Blumberg’s letter.

Space limitations prevent me from addressing much of what she has to say, so I’ll have to focus on just a few aspects of her comments.

I’ll first note that “suicide” is standard terminology for those who are against aid in dying.  The use of this pejorative term ignores the huge difference between suicide as we commonly understand it and the type of deaths enabled by an aid in dying law.

Everyone who uses an aid in dying law to take fatal drugs is already close to death; such people are not in the same category as people who actually commit suicide.  The latter would have gone on living if they did not commit suicide.  People who commit suicide usually do so alone, whereas terminally ill people who take fatal drugs are usually in the company of their loved ones.  Moreover, they are emphatically not suicidal; they would gladly remain alive as long as possible, until they feel certain that they are about to become so debilitated that they will lose control of their life and their dignity.

In short, death with dignity is a sensible death; suicide, as we normally think of it, is a senseless death.  If you look no farther than the dictionary definition of suicide, you haven’t looked far enough.

Ms. Blumberg sets up a comparison between same-sex marriage and aid in dying.  Beyond the fact that both issues involve freedom of choice, advocates of aid in dying don’t try to justify aid in dying by likening it to same-sex marriage.

I believe a better analogy can be made to gun control.  Pro-gun people fight laws that would require background checks or limit the size of ammunition clips on the basis that these are preliminary steps to seizing everyone’s guns.  Similarly, Ms. Blumberg ignores the factual aspects of the proposed aid in dying legislation and instead focuses on the hypothetical possibility that it may set the stage for more sweeping end-of-life laws and inhumane attitudes in the future.

It bears repeating that the troubling scenarios she describes so well are explicitly disallowed in Connecticut’s aid in dying bill.  And Oregon’s 16 year experience with a death with dignity law (which is less restrictive than the failed Connecticut bill) has not shown the undesirable and alarming outcomes or trends mentioned by Ms. Blumberg.

She says that physician-assisted suicide (again, the term “suicide”) is discriminatory.  Indeed it is, by design.  A relatively small number of people would qualify for it according to the wording of the aid-in-dying bill, and that wording leaves no opening for a broader interpretation.  There is no “inherently bad dynamic.”

What about her belief that physicians’ perspectives will shift if aid in dying becomes part of the “treatment continuum?”  This sounds plausible until you remember that nothing really changes except that a relative handful of patients will now have aid in dying as an option.

As for the effect of this option on palliative care and hospice, Oregon’s experience shows that, perhaps unexpectedly, these end-of-life options have become more widely available and utilized than before passage of their death-with-dignity law.

Finally, I would take issue with Ms. Blumberg’s assertion that Connecticut, as a progressive state, should prevent passage of an aid-in-dying law.  It is the nature of conservative states to oppose passage of such a law.  But Connecticut residents should be able to see this law for what it actually is and is not.

We must not be misled by false reasoning and alarming scenarios that are only conjecture.

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
A healthcare system too broken to fix
by Sosena Kedebe MD

On March 25, the White house announced that it was going to invest over $6 billion in health centers that are funded through the Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) in order to expand COVID-19 vaccinations and other health services provided to vulnerable populations. As a chief medical officer for a health center that is strained to reach some of the most disenfranchised patient population in Hartford, this was great news. Yet there was a part of me that took the news with a deep concern. Why you might ask?

The Connecticut Juvenile Training School and the lie that built it
by Colleen Shaddox 

Sitting in the paddy wagon, I was afraid – maybe apprehensive was a better word, since I rightly suspected that white privilege would guarantee me good treatment.  Still, I said a prayer of thanksgiving. After years of advocating for people in our carceral system, I was given a chance to develop more empathy.

Data on race, ethnicity and language is critical to making real healthcare progress
by Vicki Veltri, Tekisha Everette and Matt McDermott.

There are significant disparities in health status based upon race, ethnicity, and other factors that deprive many Connecticut residents of an equal opportunity to enjoy good health and well-being. That some Connecticut residents live without proper treatment of illness and injury due to disparities in health care access, affordability, and outcomes based upon race, ethnicity, and language (REL) is self-evident to many but not to all.

SB 1018: Connecticut’s effort to increase prosecutorial accountability and why it will not work
by Olivia Louthen

Senate Bill 1018 does not solve Connecticut’s largest criminal justice problem: outcomes for crime victims and defendants vary based on zip codes because judicial districts operate independently of one another.

Debunking the CBIA’s takedown of the public option healthcare bill
by Bill Shortell

I am writing to those struggling to defend the public option healthcare plan, under the burden of a mass of disinformation put out by the Connecticut Business and Industry Association (CBIA). The latest version of the Public Option (SB 842) will offer a state-run healthcare package to small businesses, individuals, and not-for-profits.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion A healthcare system too broken to fix
by Sosena Kedebe MD

On March 25, the White house announced that it was going to invest over $6 billion in health centers that are funded through the Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) in order to expand COVID-19 vaccinations and other health services provided to vulnerable populations. As a chief medical officer for a health center that is strained to reach some of the most disenfranchised patient population in Hartford, this was great news. Yet there was a part of me that took the news with a deep concern. Why you might ask?

Opinion The Connecticut Juvenile Training School and the lie that built it
by Colleen Shaddox 

Sitting in the paddy wagon, I was afraid – maybe apprehensive was a better word, since I rightly suspected that white privilege would guarantee me good treatment.  Still, I said a prayer of thanksgiving. After years of advocating for people in our carceral system, I was given a chance to develop more empathy.

Opinion Data on race, ethnicity and language is critical to making real healthcare progress
by Vicki Veltri, Tekisha Everette and Matt McDermott.

There are significant disparities in health status based upon race, ethnicity, and other factors that deprive many Connecticut residents of an equal opportunity to enjoy good health and well-being. That some Connecticut residents live without proper treatment of illness and injury due to disparities in health care access, affordability, and outcomes based upon race, ethnicity, and language (REL) is self-evident to many but not to all.

Opinion SB 1018: Connecticut’s effort to increase prosecutorial accountability and why it will not work
by Olivia Louthen

Senate Bill 1018 does not solve Connecticut’s largest criminal justice problem: outcomes for crime victims and defendants vary based on zip codes because judicial districts operate independently of one another.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO