Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism
CT VIEWPOINTS -- opinions from around Connecticut

The irrational inequity of ECS administration continues

  • CT Viewpoints
  • by William A. Monti
  • August 24, 2017
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

Whether viewed through the lenses of wealth, District Reference Groups, or student achievement, Gov. Dannel Malloy’s recently announced distribution of Education Cost Sharing grant money has obvious flaws and inconsistencies that defy logic and lead one to the conclusion that this is just an extension of the arbitrary and capricious administration of the program that has plagued it in the past.

Consider the charts and the observations below, based on these downloadable files.

Malloy interim grants by cut  Malloy interim grants by SBAC scores
Malloy interim grants by wealth decile Malloy interim grants by percent cut
District Reference Groups

On the DRG chart, things start consistently, as they should be since DRG ratings group towns according to similar characteristics.   Hence, all 10 towns in DRG A have been cut back 100 percent.

However, the consistency deteriorates in the ensuing groups.  For example, in DRG B, 32 towns have lost 100 percent. However, Hebron loses 90 percent, Ellington and Tolland escape at 80 percent, while Salem and Suffield lose 70 percent.  Meanwhile, Somers has been cut only 50 percent! So much for similarity.

The inconsistency continues and expands.  In DRG C, 22 towns lose 100 percent.  Wallingford and Newington are at 90 percent, with Watertown at 80 percent.  Then there are Mansfield and Windsor from whom the governor takes just 40 percent and 0 percent respectively.  Clearly, the towns in this DRG are not all being treated similarly.

It would be wrong to expect that because DRG D is toward the middle of the grouping range that the governor has not deprived its towns of their entire grant.  Twenty-six lose 100 percent.  Of course, there are two that lose 90 percent, six that lose 80 percent, and six  that lose 70 percent.  And just as sure, there are four at 50 percent, and even one (Canterbury) at 40 percent.  Again, we see a range of inconsistency in a group of similar towns.

Directly in the middle of the pack is DRG E with Canaan, Plymouth, Salisbury, and Union at the 100 percent cut level.  And there is Windsor at zero percent.  In between are four towns at 80 percent cutback, three at 70 percent and 50 percent respectively, and seven towns at 40 percent cutback.  Where is the similarity here?

Mercifully, there are only three schools in DRG F, and all three survived the governor’s axe.  So too did the 13 towns in the “lowest” reference groups, H and I.  But even at the lower levels there is inconsistency.  While 12 towns in DRG G lose 0 percent of their dollars, four get chopped deeply by the governor:  Enfield (70 percent), Groton (70 percent), Torrington (80 percent), and Stratford (100 percent).  Why the gross difference?

It would appear that the governor’s cutback formula, if there was one, did not consistently reflect the District Reference Groups.  Perhaps the other charts will show a more rational and consistent methodology.

Wealth Deciles

How closely do the ECS cuts by Gov. Malloy align with the levels of wealth of Connecticut towns?

There is some consistency in the upper wealth levels.   All 16 towns in the first wealth decile were cut 100 percent by the governor.  Sixteen of the 17 towns in the second wealth decile were cut 100 percent, but Stamford, Malloy’s home town, was held harmless at 0 percent.  Likewise, in wealth decile three, 16 towns were cut 100 percent, but Norwalk was held harmless at 0 percent.  Finally, in wealth decile four, all but two towns were cut 100 percent.  Hebron at 90 percent and North Stonington at 80 percent were the exceptions.  Here the deviation is less drastic in range despite the increase in number of exceptions.

Things are less clearly defined in the middle levels.   In decile five 12 towns lost 100 percent, and five lost somewhat less (Bolton, 90 percent; Franklin and Tolland, 80 percent; Salem and Suffield, 70 percent).  Again, in decile six, fewer towns – eight of 17 – lost 100 percent. Two were at 90 percent, one at 80 percent, and three at 70 percent.  Here, however, there were three radical deviations with Somers at 50 percent and both Bloomfield and Windsor at 0 percent.  This wide range strongly tests the assumption that wealth level was the main criterion in the governor’s thinking.

In decile seven, it is no surprise that 14 towns were cut less than 100 percent.  However, that there were two towns, Beacon Falls and West Hartford, getting 100 percent whacks was definitely unusual at this wealth level.  The other 14 cuts were made at 90 percent (one), 80 percent (five), 70 percent (four), and 50 percent (four).  The diversity of cut levels in this decile causes further questions regarding the governor’s method.

Adding to the doubt is the range and diversity of cuts in decile eight.  Plymouth, Stratford, and Wethersfield lost 100 percent; Danbury and East Windsor lost 0 percent.  In between, seven towns lost 70 percent or 80 percent, and five towns lost 40 percent or 50 percent.  Where is the logic of wealth here?

In the next to last decile, there is again diversity in the cut levels.  Not surprisingly, seven towns lost 0 percent and seven others lost 40 percent or 50 percent.  But Enfield and Thomaston were cut 90 percent, and two other towns lost 70 percent.  Does this seem rational for the second lowest level of wealth?

And in the lowest wealth decile all 17 towns were spared any cuts … ah, no…., only 16.  Torrington’s ECS grant was slashed a massive 80 percent!    What?! Why?

Although there is some measure of consistency in the treatment of the highest and lowest wealth deciles, the range and diversity of cuts within and among the others demonstrates that the governor’s ECS cuts do not necessarily correspond to the levels of town wealth.  Except for the cuts made in the first, second, and tenth deciles (with one obvious exception in each), the governor’s reductions are not consistent with the comparative wealth of the towns in the other deciles.

Student Achievement in the Smarter Balanced ELA Assessment

The governor may have in some way considered student achievement results in determining his proposal for ECS cuts.  Here is a look at how those cuts align with the four quartiles of the Smarter Balanced ELA3+ results for 2016-17.

First Quartile, 42 towns, 19.4 – 36.5  percent

Percent Cut No. of towns Percent Cut No. of towns
100 3 90 1
80 2 70 2
50 1 40 3
0 30

Second Quartile, 42 towns, 36.6 – 54 percent

Percent Cut No. of towns Percent Cut No. of towns
100 15 90 3
80 7 70 7
50 7 40 3
0 0

Third Quartile, 43 towns, 54.1 – 73.6 percent

Percent Cut No. of towns Percent Cut No. of towns
100 33 90 0
80 4 70 4
50 1 40 1
0 0

Fourth Quartile, 42 towns, 73.7 percent – 88 percent

Percent Cut No. of towns Percent Cut No. of towns
100 37 90 1
80 1 70 2
50 0 40 1
0 0

Clearly, all of the towns from which governor took no ECS dollars are in the lowest quartile of student achievement.  Although the number of towns from which he took 100 percent increases in each quartile, it is equally clear that 18 towns that lost all their funding were in the lower half of the achievement range.

Moreover, the cut levels within and among the quartiles are not consistent.  If student achievement counts toward ECS funding, then how do eight towns in the lowest quartile lose over 50 percent of their funding when three towns in the top two quartiles keep 50 percent of theirs?

It is curious that no town lost 10 percent, 20 percent, 30 percent, or 60 percent, or that all the cut percentages ended in zero.  This indicates the use of a simplistic formula– an arbitrary “easy fix” — not something appropriate for the complex and vital subject of education cost sharing.

Individual Cases and Comparisons

Torrington is in the lowest wealth decile and DRG G.  Its 2016-7 ELA3+ result (43.2 percent) was in the lowest quartile.  Yet, its ECS funding was cut 80 percent by the governor.  Meanwhile, Stamford is in the second highest wealth decile and DRG F.  Its 2016-7 ELA3+ was in the lowest quartile but slightly higher (48.1 percent) than Torrington.  Its ECS funding was not cut at all by the governor.

Stratford is in wealth decile 8 and DRG G.  Its 2016-17 ELA3+ result (48.1 percent) was in the lowest quartile.  Its ECS funding was cut 100 percent.  Meanwhile, East Windsor, also in wealth decile 8 and DRG G with only slightly lower ELA3+ results (43.5 percent) than Stratford, but still in the same lowest quartile, was cut 0 percent.

Plymouth and Plainville are both in the eighth wealth decile and DRG E.  Plymouth’s ELA3+ results were 55.5 percent — just lower than Plainfield’s 56 percent.  Yet the governor slashed Plymouth’s ECS by 100 percent and Plainville’s by only 80 percent.  More shocking is the governor’s treatment of Montville, in the same wealth and DRG categories as Plymouth and Plainville, with a slightly higher 59.2 percent ELA3+ score.  He pares just 50 percent of Montville’s ESC funding.  Where is the consistency here?

A more subtle comparison involves Woodbury and Hebron.  Both are in DRG B and wealth decile 4.  Both are in regional school districts.  Woodbury’s ELA3+ rating of 60.66 percent was slightly lower than Hebron’s 65.6 percent.  Yet Woodbury was cut a greater percentage (100 percent) of its ECS funding than Hebron (90 percent).

William A. Monti is a member of the  Woodbury Board of Finance.

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Right to counsel is just as much a racial justice as a housing policy
by Viewpoints Contributor

Despite the state and federal moratoriums on eviction, nearly 3,000 Connecticut families have faced eviction in the past 10 months. Over half of these families were Black or Latinx, even though these groups combined comprise less than a quarter of the overall population. The stop-gap measures pursued by the state are not enough. Connecticut needs a statewide right to counsel for tenants facing eviction to address the burning housing and racial justice crisis across the state.

We need justice, not politics
by Richard J. Colangelo Jr. and 13 State's Attorneys

The administration of justice should not be political. Prosecutors must be guided by the evidence in a case and the applicable law, not by partisan, political considerations. Political pressure should never sway a prosecutor’s decision-making.

Assisted suicide lobby spreads falsehoods to promote systemic ableism
by Stephen Mendelsohn

Proponents of assisted suicide repeatedly spread falsehoods to promote their lethal and ableist agenda.  The February 8 op-ed, “Aid in dying is not assisted suicide” is no exception. Suicide is defined as the act of taking one’s life intentionally.  The person who intentionally ingests a prescribed lethal overdose more closely fits the dictionary definition of suicide than the despondent person who jumps off a bridge.  The desire for suicide is a cry for help, even when redefined as a “medical treatment option.”

TCI will create a fourth gasoline tax
by Christian A. Herb

The Transportation Climate Initiative, or TCI, calls for a proposed emissions fee on gasoline to help battle climate change. On the surface, supporters say it is a small price to pay to help save the planet; and if you truly believe that this is the case, then you should consider voting for it. Despite the administration’s efforts to go out of their way to not call TCI a tax, the simple truth is that it will only create additional financial hardships on lower- and middle-income families struggling to make ends meet during the pandemic.

Let’s keep telehealth when the pandemic ends
by Steven Madonick, MD

Telehealth may lead to positive, even transformational changes in psychiatric care, and Connecticut needs to keep it after the pandemic. Connecticut needs to pass the necessary laws to continue telehealth and telephonic care.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion Right to counsel is just as much a racial justice as a housing policy
by Viewpoints Contributor

Despite the state and federal moratoriums on eviction, nearly 3,000 Connecticut families have faced eviction in the past 10 months. Over half of these families were Black or Latinx, even though these groups combined comprise less than a quarter of the overall population. The stop-gap measures pursued by the state are not enough. Connecticut needs a statewide right to counsel for tenants facing eviction to address the burning housing and racial justice crisis across the state.

Opinion We need justice, not politics
by Richard J. Colangelo Jr. and 13 State's Attorneys

The administration of justice should not be political. Prosecutors must be guided by the evidence in a case and the applicable law, not by partisan, political considerations. Political pressure should never sway a prosecutor’s decision-making.

Opinion Assisted suicide lobby spreads falsehoods to promote systemic ableism
by Stephen Mendelsohn

Proponents of assisted suicide repeatedly spread falsehoods to promote their lethal and ableist agenda.  The February 8 op-ed, “Aid in dying is not assisted suicide” is no exception. Suicide is defined as the act of taking one’s life intentionally.  The person who intentionally ingests a prescribed lethal overdose more closely fits the dictionary definition of suicide than the despondent person who jumps off a bridge.  The desire for suicide is a cry for help, even when redefined as a “medical treatment option.”

Opinion TCI will create a fourth gasoline tax
by Christian A. Herb

The Transportation Climate Initiative, or TCI, calls for a proposed emissions fee on gasoline to help battle climate change. On the surface, supporters say it is a small price to pay to help save the planet; and if you truly believe that this is the case, then you should consider voting for it. Despite the administration’s efforts to go out of their way to not call TCI a tax, the simple truth is that it will only create additional financial hardships on lower- and middle-income families struggling to make ends meet during the pandemic.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO