Women are an integral part of CSCU leadership
Nine of the 13 voting members of the Board of Regents are women.
We write in response to a number of recent CT Viewpoints op-eds, including one claiming that women are not holding leadership positions at the community colleges.
Simply put, this is wholly untrue. The Board of Regents and system office are committed to diversity and inclusion in the CSCU system. We believe this leads to respect and understanding across cultures and to better decisions for our students, our faculty, our campus managerial and professional staff, and the communities in which the campuses live and thrive.
Campus community college executive leadership is changing under the new Students First plan. When current campus presidents retire, they are replaced by a lower-salaried campus chief executive officer. This is part of the Board’s plan as it restructures administration and reduces costs while maintaining important campus and community leadership.
Currently, there are ten campus leaders, four of whom are women. At the end of this academic year, there will be four additional vacancies. A woman has been named to fill the first of those vacancies; thus, to date, women comprise half of the community colleges’ leaders in place for the next academic year.
Nine of the 13 voting members of the Board of Regents are women. The system’s provost – the chief academic officer for our colleges and universities – is a woman, as are seven of the 12 academic deans for the community colleges. At the state universities, two of our four presidents are women.
Women were represented at each stage of the search process for the recently appointed community college regional presidents. The national search actively encouraged women and members of minoritized groups to apply. Two of the three search committee chairs were women, each Regional Advisory Committee had at least one female co-chair, and 34 of the 51 members of the three regional, campus-based advisory committees were women. Eleven women were among the 61 applicants. To reach final decisions on regional presidents, the Regents relied heavily on the feedback and insights of campus advisory committees. Those conversations were candid, thoughtful, and reflective of how the advisory committees assessed the finalists’ past experiences, accomplishments and demonstrated ability to lead.
Academic leadership at our colleges and universities is more diverse than the state’s population at large. And it should be, for a system that is the single most important academic option for minoritized students in our diverse state. Going forward, we will not shrink from our unshakable commitment to CSCU leadership that continues to reflect the diversity of our institutions and our state.
Women have been, and continue to be, valued leaders within CSCU.
There have also been numerous opinion pieces – most of them from the same group – opposing the consolidation of the community colleges. The Board does not have the luxury of ignoring an unsustainable organizational structure that contributes $20 million annually to operating deficits, nor can the Board abide the continued evisceration of community college reserves that actually do threaten student services, affordability, and even the long-term viability of campuses.
Further, it is our responsibility as a governing body to do everything in our power to improve student outcomes. With a current three-year completion rate of just 16 percent in our community colleges, we can and must do better.
When fully implemented in 2023, the Students First plan will refocus dwindling resources away from administration and toward crucially needed academic supports, implement at scale best practices for student success, and create $23 million in annual savings – putting our system on firmer financial footing.
The road to the more sustainable, student-focused future necessitates choices that may be difficult, but they are clear.
Matt Fleury and Merle Harris are the chair and vice chair of the Board of Regents for Higher Education.
CTViewpoints welcomes rebuttal or opposing views to this and all its commentaries. Read our guidelines and submit your commentary here.