Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

Critical health decisions await the next Congress

  • by Deirdre Shesgreen
  • November 10, 2010
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

WASHINGTON–As they prepare to exercise their new-found legislative power, Republicans in Washington have made health reform their No. 1 target.

But while efforts to defund or derail the overhaul law will no doubt be center stage come January, a host of other health care policies could be also be tweaked or significantly revamped as the power shifts in Congress.

Republicans may try to push forward on long-held priorities, such as medical malpractice reform and altering Medicaid. And they will be forced to deal with other dicey questions, like what to do about looming cuts to Medicare physician payments.

Meanwhile, initiatives that Democrats had hoped to press, such as allowing Medicare to negotiate with pharmaceutical companies on drug prices, will likely be dead on arrival.

“I’m more than a little panicked,” Ellen Andrews, executive director of the Connecticut Health Policy Project, said of the possible changes coming from Washington.

Other health care advocates, including doctors and hospital groups, are still sorting out what the redrawn political landscape will mean for their legislative priorities.

For Connecticut doctors, the new Congress could be a mixed bag. The biggest concern for most physicians is a 23 percent cut in Medicare reimbursement rates, scheduled to take effect Dec. 1.

The American Medical Association, along with state-level doctors’ groups, is aggressively lobbying Congress to block that pay cut from going into effect. They also want a more permanent fix to the federal formula that sets reimbursements, which calls for a series of future payment reductions, including one for January 2011.

“To be looking down the barrel of a 25 to 30 percent reduction is huge,” said Ken Ferrucci, a lobbyist with the Connecticut State Medical Society. If the cuts become law, it would translate into $360 million in lost revenue over the next 13 months for Connecticut doctors, according to the society’s figures.

Democrats, while they still hold power during the lame-duck session, may approve yet another temporary fix to the payment rates and then dump the longer-term problem in the GOP’s lap.

“It’s not unreasonable for the Democrats to say, ‘You won the election–You deal with this’,” said Henry Aaron, a health policy expert at the left-leaning Brookings Institution.

Since Republicans swept to power in large part on a pledge to cut federal spending by $100 billion, it’s unclear how they will navigate this pricey quandary. A full-fledged fix to overturn the reimbursement reductions would cost an estimated $300 billion over ten years.

Ferrucci and others say they’re waiting to see how the GOP might move forward. If Congress doesn’t respond to doctors’ pleas, seniors might carry more sway.

“Our members don’t really care what party the legislators are in,” said Jennifer Millea, a spokeswoman for AARP Connecticut. “They’re worried if this cut goes through, they will no longer be able to see their doctor. So we’re working very hard to get the best and longest solution that we can to prevent this cut and make sure Congress addresses it with a permanent fix.”

Doctors might find a warmer reception when they press their No. 2 agenda item: medical malpractice reform. This issue is particularly salient in Connecticut, where doctors pay some of the highest malpractice insurance premiums in the country.

“We hope this will get some attention” in the next Congress, Ferrucci said.

It almost certainly will. Republicans have long pushed for caps on jury awards in malpractice suits as a way to lower doctors’ insurance premiums and trim health care costs. Addressing the issue of “junk lawsuits” is part of the GOP’s repeal-and-replace strategy for health reform.

Aaron, of the Brookings Institute, said if lawmakers are in the mood to compromise on any health care issues next year, malpractice reform could be it.

“There’s a deal to be made here,” he said. He noted that some Democrats have called for a new arbitration system that handles some patients’ claims through negotiation instead of a legal battle. If Republicans agree to that, he said Democrats may very well accept some limits on damage awards.

President Barack Obama has already signaled an interest in the issue, although Congressional Democrats have traditionally opposed lawsuit caps. Opponents say such limits close off a legitimate avenue of recourse for patients who received harmful medical care, while supporters say it forces doctors to order unnecessary tests to shield themselves from frivolous claims.

Whether Republicans tackle larger health-care policy questions, such as the ballooning costs of Medicare and Medicaid, remains to be seen.

In the House GOP’s “Pledge to America,” the new leaders said only that they wanted to provide a “full accounting” of entitlement programs and would prevent the “expansion of unfunded mandates.”

Some advocates, like Andrews, worry this vague language will, in practice, mean Medicaid reimbursement cuts. That, she said, would further restrict access to the health care safety net program for the poor, even as its rolls swell.

“If you put another 150,000 people into Medicaid in Connecticut but don’t pay doctors and hospitals enough, then patients are not going to have anywhere to get care,” she said.

Stephen Frayne, a lobbyist with the Connecticut Hospital Association, said federal reimbursement rates for Medicare and Medicaid are already woefully inadequate and the stewardship of those programs going forward is a top concern.

“It’s hard to imagine it could get much worse than it is,” he said. “But I think if they become overly zealous in their desire to cut the existing level of funding, we’re basically going to see more institutions close, more mergers, and reductions in access to service.”

Andrews said she’s also worried about a gamut of lower-profile issues, such as the funding included in the stimulus bill to help health care providers implement health information technology systems. That funding has yet to be doled out, and as Republicans look for money to squeeze from the federal budget, that could become a target, she fears.

At a news conference Wednesday, the presumptive House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, steered clear of such policy minutia, taking only a few questions about tax cuts and other matters before heading back into his office to plot out the GOP transition.

His spokesman, Michael Steel, said later that Republicans weren’t ready to delve into these policy questions quite yet.

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Deirdre Shesgreen

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
One step Connecticut can take to address our maternal mortality crisis
by Myechia Minter-Jordan, MD

Uncertainty. Fear. Worry. These are just a few of the thoughts and emotions that run through the minds of almost every expecting parent. And for many expecting Black parents, those feelings can be more acute. That’s because for far too many, having a child is a life and death struggle.

Connecticut lawmakers on aid in dying: two decades of delay, deferral, obstruction
by Paul Bluestein, MD

Very soon, members of the Connecticut House and Senate will be voting on HB6425, - the Medical Aid in Dying bill. More than 20 years ago, Oregon implemented its Death with Dignity Act. Since then, Washington, Vermont, California, Montana, Colorado, Maine, Washington DC, Hawaii and most recently New Mexico have passed legislation authorizing medical aid in dying for terminally ill adults. But not Connecticut.

The intersection of race, class and gender in America’s childcare system: The class edition
by Georgia Goldburn

When Michelle Obama declared that she wanted to become “Mom in Chief,” she spoke to a sentiment shared by many women, i.e. the desire to be the primary caregiver of their young children in their early years. Not unexpectedly, Mrs. Obama was derided for making that choice, highlighting how society stands ready to indict women […]

A 71-year-old white woman has a request of the police
by Maggie Goodwin

Please officer, begin to look at every traffic stop and nonviolent police intervention as one where you will meet me, a white-haired 71-year-old retired social worker.

A progressive income tax to re-align Connecticut’s moral compass
by Ezra Kaprov

Redistribution of wealth and property is a fundamental and missing pillar of the hope for multi-racial democracy in the United States.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion One step Connecticut can take to address our maternal mortality crisis
by Myechia Minter-Jordan, MD

Uncertainty. Fear. Worry. These are just a few of the thoughts and emotions that run through the minds of almost every expecting parent. And for many expecting Black parents, those feelings can be more acute. That’s because for far too many, having a child is a life and death struggle.

Opinion Connecticut lawmakers on aid in dying: two decades of delay, deferral, obstruction
by Paul Bluestein, MD

Very soon, members of the Connecticut House and Senate will be voting on HB6425, - the Medical Aid in Dying bill. More than 20 years ago, Oregon implemented its Death with Dignity Act. Since then, Washington, Vermont, California, Montana, Colorado, Maine, Washington DC, Hawaii and most recently New Mexico have passed legislation authorizing medical aid in dying for terminally ill adults. But not Connecticut.

Opinion The intersection of race, class and gender in America’s childcare system: The class edition
by Georgia Goldburn

When Michelle Obama declared that she wanted to become “Mom in Chief,” she spoke to a sentiment shared by many women, i.e. the desire to be the primary caregiver of their young children in their early years. Not unexpectedly, Mrs. Obama was derided for making that choice, highlighting how society stands ready to indict women […]

Opinion A progressive income tax to re-align Connecticut’s moral compass
by Ezra Kaprov

Redistribution of wealth and property is a fundamental and missing pillar of the hope for multi-racial democracy in the United States.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO