Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

Advocates fear change in state health care payment policy will limit access

  • by Arielle Levin Becker
  • November 12, 2010
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

Payment rates for physicians and other health care providers in the HUSKY and Charter Oak programs, already considered inadequate by many providers, could get even lower under a policy change made earlier this year, prompting concerns among lawmakers and advocates that patients in the state programs could struggle to find doctors to treat them.

“This is guaranteed to hurt access,” said Sheldon Toubman, a lawyer with the New Haven Legal Assistance Association. Toubman, along with other health care advocates and legislators, learned of the change during a meeting Friday.

The state contracts with three managed-care companies to administer HUSKY and Charter Oak. It pays the companies a set amount per enrollee, and the companies contract with health care providers.

Since 2008, the state Department of Social Services has set minimum levels for the payments to providers. The department removed that requirement in August, retroactive to July 1. The change would affect all providers except federally designated community health centers.

The department is in the process of negotiating contracts with the managed-care companies. If the insurers save money by paying providers less, the state could negotiate lower payments to the insurers, although it is not clear how much the change would save in the short term.

A representative from Aetna, one of the insurers, said the company was not renegotiating with providers to pay less than the previous minimum levels. It was not clear Friday if the other two companies were doing so.

Lawmakers and patient advocates raised concerns that allowing insurers to lower payment rates could lead doctors and other providers to stop taking HUSKY and Charter Oak patients, or to limit how many they treat.

In addition to reducing access to health care, Toubman said, the change is unlikely to save the state money.

He pointed to a report last month showing that the insurers made margins of more than 20 percent in one of the HUSKY plans, and said the rates paid with the floor in place were already considered inadequate and produced “serious access problems.”

“This is guaranteed to make it worse,” he said.

State Rep. Vickie Nardello also raised concerns, saying experience suggests that provider rates will fall, making it harder for patients to get care.

“I am concerned about this. I understand the reasoning, but I don’t totally agree with it,” she said.

Nardello, a Democrat from Prospect, said the change could produce winners and losers, hurting providers who are not as skilled at negotiating.

State Rep. David McCluskey asked whether the department had considered excluding preventive services from the change. It had not, said Mark Schaefer, the department’s director of medical care administration.

“We want to make sure that in our exuberance to save a nickel here, that going forward it’s not going to cost us a dollar, two dollars,” said McCluskey, a Democrat from West Hartford. “And as important is the health of the people we’re providing Medicaid services to.”

Schaefer said that if the change saves money without reducing access to care or quality, he might not be particularly concerned, as long as the state can capture the savings, rather than letting them simply improve the insurers’ bottom lines.

Council member Debra Polun raised another concern: If it becomes clear that access to care, or quality of care, have been reduced, the state would seem to have little recourse until the next contracts are negotiated. She suggested building something into the contracts that would allow the state to address any problems sooner.

Schaefer said the department would consider if there is enough of a baseline to measure changes and whether doing so would be wise.

He noted that there was no floor on provider payments from 1995 to 2008.

“The policy was sufficient for 13 years, if I have my math correct,” he said.

Schaefer pointed to the need to achieve the greatest savings possible, and said managed-care companies can get the most efficient rates the market allows.

“My plea is that we embrace both the cost, quality and access, sort of all as a piece, because that’s really going to be the order of the day over the next few years,” he said.

Schaefer said the department can negotiate reductions in what the state pays each insurer based on the savings from removing the payment floor. He declined to discuss specifics of the contract talks, including what assumptions the state was making about rates providers would be paid, until after the negotiations are complete.

While the department is negotiating contracts with the insurers, it and the Medicaid council have been contemplating changing the way HUSKY and Charter Oak are administered, including possibly moving the programs out of managed care and into a system in which an outside company administers the program but the state pays the medical claims.

Toubman said Friday that the removal of the payment floor underscored the urgency of moving HUSKY away from its current management system.

He and other advocates have suggested that the state move to a system known as primary care case management, in which there is no insurance company and primary care providers are paid a monthly fee to coordinate their patients’ care. A small portion of the HUSKY program currently uses that method, a program known as HUSKY Primary Care. DSS officials have raised concerns about the feasibility of expanding the program statewide.

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Arielle Levin Becker

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Man jailed on $155k bond dies of COVID-19
by Kelan Lyons

This is the sixth incarcerated person to die from the virus this month.

Senate leader pitches new state property tax on high-value homes
by Keith M. Phaneuf

The state Senate’s highest-ranking Democrat proposed new taxes on high-value homes and the capital gains of Connecticut's highest earners.

It’s time to standardize arts grants in Connecticut
by Mandi Jackson and Daniel Fitzmaurice

What all arts organizations need most right now is multi-year, unrestricted general operating support with simplified, fair processes for accountability. This would allow the arts community to better respond to the needs of Connecticut residents instead of the political process, lobbyists, or wealthy donors.

Accessory dwelling units are a good thing
by Toni Gold

Connecticut’s large, old houses are a resource that any town should treasure — not just for their charm and historical value, but because of their potential for adaptation. One tool that can help ensure the viability of these structures is zoning, and particularly zoning for accessory dwelling units (ADUs). There’s a movement to  legalize ADUs statewide. It’s a good idea whose time has come.

New Haven and Yale: Giamatti and DiLieto:  A historic moment? Or a model? 
by Neil Thomas Proto

The City of New Haven’s effort today to seek an increase in financial contribution from Yale is more historically justified than is often recognized.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion It’s time to standardize arts grants in Connecticut
by Mandi Jackson and Daniel Fitzmaurice

What all arts organizations need most right now is multi-year, unrestricted general operating support with simplified, fair processes for accountability. This would allow the arts community to better respond to the needs of Connecticut residents instead of the political process, lobbyists, or wealthy donors.

Opinion Accessory dwelling units are a good thing
by Toni Gold

Connecticut’s large, old houses are a resource that any town should treasure — not just for their charm and historical value, but because of their potential for adaptation. One tool that can help ensure the viability of these structures is zoning, and particularly zoning for accessory dwelling units (ADUs). There’s a movement to  legalize ADUs statewide. It’s a good idea whose time has come.

Opinion New Haven and Yale: Giamatti and DiLieto:  A historic moment? Or a model? 
by Neil Thomas Proto

The City of New Haven’s effort today to seek an increase in financial contribution from Yale is more historically justified than is often recognized.

Opinion A call to save arms: is vaccination really the solution?
by Genevieve Diamant

Economic modelling done by professional statisticians is often used to claim that the ounce of prevention provided by a vaccine is much better than the pound of cure that well-funded hospitals, fully staffed with professional nurses and doctors, using effective pharmaceutical remedies, can provide. But is this actually true?

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO