Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

Charting SustiNet’s course after federal reform

  • by Arielle Levin Becker
  • November 18, 2010
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

When it was introduced last year, the SustiNet health plan was envisioned as a way to achieve universal health care coverage for the state. That was before federal health care reform changed the landscape for state-level reform efforts, putting Connecticut and the rest of the country on a path toward near-universal coverage by 2014.

Now the board charged with developing SustiNet is nearing key decisions that will shape the health plan. The board is slated to make recommendations in the coming months to the legislature and governor, who will ultimately determine what SustiNet becomes.

But it remains to be seen exactly what role SustiNet plays, and how much attention it gets from a legislature and governor negotiating a budget deficit of between $3.4 billion and $3.7 billion.

SustiNet supporters say the plan can still play a key role in the state, serving as a public health insurance option that competes with commercial insurance plans.

Governor-elect Dan Malloy said Thursday that he is awaiting the board’s recommendations about exactly what role SustiNet will play and how it interacts with federal health reform. But he said SustiNet should have a role, and noted that he was an early supporter of the original SustiNet proposal.

“There’s nothing more important to the 14 percent of Connecticut’s population currently without health care than access to health care and access to a job,” he said. “I know that it’s first and foremost on their minds and therefore needs to be a high priority for me as governor.”

Juan Figueroa, president of the Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut, which created SustiNet, said Malloy’s election was a positive move for the prospects of state-level health care reform.

“Having said that, look, we’re all aware that the first thing that he has to deal with is the 3-plus-billion-dollar structural deficit, and as it should be, that’s going to be framing everything that gets done next legislative session,” Figueroa said.

But Figueroa and other SustiNet supporters say addressing health care reform is critical to, not a distraction from, improving the economy.

“The out-of-control spiraling health care costs that small businesses face is something that’s going to have to be dealt with if we expect to revive our economy and create jobs in those small businesses,” Figueroa said. “They’re interrelated.”

According to an analysis presented Thursday, nearly any option the SustiNet board is considering could save the state between $32 million and $427 million in one year once it is implemented, largely because the state could capture additional federal money.

“The state budget situation would improve,” said Stan Dorn, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute and a consultant to the SustiNet board who presented the analysis.

A key premise behind SustiNet is that having a large pool of insured people will give the health plan leverage to negotiate lower costs and other changes to the health care delivery system that could ultimately save money. The board has also worked on developing practices intended to cut health care spending, including the use of the patient-centered medical home concept, health information technology such as electronic medical records, and payment reform.

Dorn’s presentation included six options under consideration. The economic impact of any of them depends largely on how much SustiNet can affect health care spending, and the analysis looked at each option under two scenarios: a “pessimistic” version in which SustiNet produces no change in health care costs, and an “optimistic” one in which SustiNet slows the annual growth in health care spending by 1 percent.

According to the analysis, each option would cut the number of uninsured residents in the state by more than half, and all but one would save the state money.

The potential SustiNet models would likely lead some small employers to stop offering coverage to their workers, saving the businesses money. Dorn said most of the workers would instead be covered by SustiNet or through the health insurance exchange, the marketplace created by federal health reform for purchasing coverage that will begin in 2014. Under the federal health reform law, people earning below a certain income level will receive subsidies to purchase coverage on the exchange.

The different options vary in how expansive SustiNet would be.

The most basic would be to use SustiNet to cover only those already covered by state-administered health programs – state employees and retirees and people in Medicaid, HUSKY and other public health programs. Under federal health reform, more state residents would become eligible for Medicaid coverage, so the number of people covered in this scenario by 2017 would be more than are currently covered.

Three other coverage options add more groups to the SustiNet insurance pool.

One would expand SustiNet only to low-income adults who are not eligible for Medicaid, an estimated 56,000 people. For them, it would be an alternative to buying insurance through the exchange.

Getting coverage through SustiNet would cost those adults less than purchasing coverage on the exchange, even with the subsidies, Dorn said. The federal government would pay the costs of covering that group, saving the state between $47 million and $50 million, he said. And it would make the SustiNet coverage pool larger, giving it more leverage.

There are also downsides, Dorn said: Buying insurance through the exchanges would give people access to more plan options and larger networks of health care providers than participate in state-administered programs.

Another option would allow small firms, municipalities and nonprofits to buy coverage through SustiNet. And a fourth option would allow every individual and firm in the state to buy into SustiNet. Doing so would have little effect on savings to the state and for employers, according to the analysis.

The analysis also looked at two changes to the state’s HUSKY health plan, which covers close to 400,000 children and parents. Health care providers are paid less to treat HUSKY patients than those with commercial insurance, leading many health care providers not to accept HUSKY or to limit the number of HUSKY patients they see.

One option would be to raise the HUSKY payment rates to health providers to equal what commercial insurers, a 34.5 percent increase. Because the federal government reimburses the state for a portion of its Medicaid costs – and the bulk of HUSKY recipients are covered by Medicaid – the state would not pay the full cost of the additional spending.

But if SustiNet does not have an impact on health care spending – the pessimistic scenario – increasing HUSKY rates would ultimately cost the state money. If SustiNet can slow the growth of health care costs, raising HUSKY rates would cut into the savings SustiNet achieved, but still save money overall.

The analysis also looked at expanding HUSKY in 2012 and 2013 to adults who currently earn slightly too much money to qualify, allowing them to receive state coverage before federal health reform rolls out. Doing so would reduce the number of uninsured residents in the state by 59,000, according to the analysis, but would cost the state between $103 million and $150 million a year.

Several board members said the state must be more aggressive in cutting the growth of health care spending than the 1 percent projected in the analysis’ “optimistic” scenario.

“We don’t have a choice no matter what happens on anything else,” said Ellen Andrews, a board member and executive director of the Connecticut Health Policy Project. “We have got to reduce spending.”

The board will meet in executive session Dec. 2 for what co-chairman Kevin Lembo called “the embarrassing questions, break the dishes” session. They are then scheduled to meet in public Dec. 15.

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Arielle Levin Becker

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Advocates call on state to improve response to vulnerable students
by Adria Watson

State child advocate Sarah Eagan and attorney Martha Stone want the state to do more for these students during COVID.

CT budget leaders want to use massive savings to expand COVID-19 relief
by Keith M. Phaneuf

Gov. Ned Lamont’s administration expects to spend about $630 million less than legislators authorized.

The game is changing. Chris Murphy says he’s ready to play.
by Mark Pazniokas

The question for Sen. Chris Murphy no longer is where might he go next, but what can he do now.

Connecticut’s $100 million college shell game
by Stephen Adair

The plan to consolidate the 12 community colleges in Connecticut into one college with 12 campuses is called “Students First,” which is ironic because it does not fund students first.  It funds a new administration in a new, statewide bureaucracy. The Board of Regents (BOR) and the Connecticut State Colleges and Universities (CSCU) system office […]

Inconsistent television captioning is a barrier to equal access
by Jeffrey Bravin and Barbara Cassin

Our world long ago entered the age of the 24-hour news cycle, and a full understanding of the “who, what, when, where and why” of the news is critical for deaf, deafblind and hard of hearing citizens. Yet, Connecticut’s inconsistent quality of television captioning locks our community out of the complete sense of what is happening.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion Connecticut’s $100 million college shell game
by Stephen Adair

The plan to consolidate the 12 community colleges in Connecticut into one college with 12 campuses is called “Students First,” which is ironic because it does not fund students first.  It funds a new administration in a new, statewide bureaucracy. The Board of Regents (BOR) and the Connecticut State Colleges and Universities (CSCU) system office […]

Opinion Inconsistent television captioning is a barrier to equal access
by Jeffrey Bravin and Barbara Cassin

Our world long ago entered the age of the 24-hour news cycle, and a full understanding of the “who, what, when, where and why” of the news is critical for deaf, deafblind and hard of hearing citizens. Yet, Connecticut’s inconsistent quality of television captioning locks our community out of the complete sense of what is happening.

Opinion A just stimulus package is a start toward true racial inclusion
by Carlton L Highsmith

For centuries Blacks have been denied full participation in the American Dream. But for the sake of our collective progress, as we recover from the crippling economic effects of COVID-19, our country has a mandate to acknowledge its history of systematic institutionalized exclusionary practices and not repeat them.

Opinion Hamden taxpayers are left in the dark
by Lauren Garrett

“A budget is a moral document.” This phrase is often heard during budget season from both sides of the aisle advocating for their personal values. The municipal operating budget is the cost of running a town which includes paying for employees, schools, and other services. Asking residents to pay property taxes requires a public trust.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO