Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

Hopes of reviving solar industry ride on new energy legislation

  • by Jan Ellen Spiegel
  • May 20, 2011
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

Not long ago, Connecticut’s solar energy industry was thriving, the envy of other states. Then the state’s generous incentive program ran out of money, the legislature failed to create a sustainable alternative, and the industry found itself on the ropes.

“It’s not in danger of losing momentum, it’s lost it,” said Ron French president of Alteris Renewables, the largest Connecticut-based solar company. Alteris’s Connecticut employee base is down by 50 percent in the last year, and like most companies here, has refocused business in states with healthier programs, principally Massachusetts and New Jersey. “We’ve grown as a company, but our growth has been in other states.”

Alteris and others are pinning their Connecticut solar revival hopes on provisions in this year’s omnibus energy bill – SB 1. But it’s a work in progress, with the original solar components proving to be some of the more contentious in the enormous, multi-provisioned bill.

A six-hour meeting last weekend among energy committee chairs, ranking members and the administration – one of a series of sessions held out of the spotlight — did not achieve final wording, but has pulled the solar language into sharper focus. The changes are at once pleasing and worrisome to solar advocates.

“As far as I’m concerned there will be a solar commitment in the bill,” said Sen. John Fonfara, D-Hartford, co-chair of the energy committee. “What we’re saying is we want to find the sweet spot.”

Finding that sweet spot will mean changing the way state has run its solar incentive program since it started in 2005 with a pot of money from electric ratepayer fees, administered by the quasi-public Clean Energy Fund.

Residential and commercial solar systems received rebates, considered the most generous in the nation when they started. The rebates were so popular and effective that the money ran out rapidly even as they spawned dozens of solar companies and hundreds of jobs.

At its peak, Connecticut was ranked among the top three states in the nation for the amount of solar it installed, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association, a trade group. With the demise of legislation in 2009 and its veto in 2010, the state fell to 18th last year.

The pending legislation uses renewable energy credits to reconfigure the commercial solar program to be largely self-sustaining and market-based. Solar system owners could finance at least part of their project costs by selling the credits, called recs, to electric utilities that need to meet renewable energy requirements.

But solar power still costs more to generate than electricity from traditional fossil fuels, though industry members and others point out that solar prices have fallen dramatically and could reach parity with fossil in the next several years. Some of the dispute over the bill’s provisions has been how to make up the difference in prices without overly-burdening ratepayers, and how long to do it.

“We talk a pretty good game with supporting a clean energy-based economy, but that takes a financial commitment” Fonfara said. “We didn’t want to do that on the backs of electric ratepayers.”

Sen. Kevin Witkos, R-Canton, ranking member on the energy committee, echoed sentiments common among legislators, saying that the 10 years of incentives in the original bill is too long, the cap on ratepayer increases not strong enough and that a solar-only program is too restrictive.

“The legislature’s job is not to pick the winner, but to make sure there’s monies available for everybody,” he said. “I’m concerned that putting more money in is still not going to realize our goal – and that is to be incentive-free.”

The compromise taking shape would expand the concept to include all alternative energy sources in two broad categories: non-emission, which covers solar, wind and hydro; and low emission, which would include fuel cells and things like bio-digesters. It would shorten the incentive lifespan considerably – though keep intact the 15 year contracts utilities must sign for purchasing renewable power, and offer a specific dollar amount that caps what utilities can pass along to customers.

Chris Phelps of Environment Connecticut, an advocacy group that has worked for solar incentive reform for years, said he supports the idea of incorporating all renewables, though he cautioned that each has quirks that need individual attention. “If it’s designed well, it can work with solar and work with wind,” he said.

In any case, achieving a sustainable clean energy system is more important than how the state gets there, he said.

“We’re at a tipping point,” he said. “If we don’t get off the dime in this state and create stable solar policies, we’re going to see that day in the not-too-distant future where solar is competitive in neighboring states, but here it’s not. We will be behind the curve.”

Solar Connecticut, a statewide trade group, warned as far back as 2009 that inaction by the state would harm solar companies precisely as it has, and while it is again pushing hard for legislation to reboot the incentive programs, any legislation is not necessarily better than no legislation said Executive Director Mike Trahan, He said curtailing the program could undermine business by not providing enough volume to drive down costs.

“Are we going to invest in that or are we going to nickel and dime it?” he asked. “At some point it won’t make sense for commercial installers to have a presence in Connecticut because there won’t be enough projects.

“It’s depressing to see installers who cut their teeth in the solar installation business in Connecticut at ratepayer expense; they’ve taken themselves and their expertise to work for ratepayers in other states.”

George Keithan, president of Consulting Engineering Services of Middletown, for one, now does 95 percent of his work out of state – mainly Massachusetts and New Jersey – setting up new companies in those states and adding about a half-dozen employees to each.

“We love to pay our taxes into the state that we’re actually doing the work in –I hate to say it,” he said. “And that’s why we would love SB1.”

The bill keeps the residential solar program in the Clean Energy Fund using about one-third of the $27 million that comes into the fund each year. The format will stay classic rebates, but they will be in what’s called a declining block structure to keep money flowing evenly and lowering incentives as solar costs go down.

The popular residential solar lease program, which is about to end after a three-year run, will not resume.

The original bill also included a 3-year pilot project for a feed-in tariff, a funding structure that has worked well in Europe and Canada for building renewable plants that feed electricity into the grid, but has been less successful in the U.S. The government sets a per kilowatt-hour price it will pay a developer for renewable electricity, and hopefully it will be enough to finance a project.

It’s unclear if that language will make the bill’s final cut, and while some are nervous about it, most say they appreciate the administration’s willingness to consider creative energy options.

“What I can tell you about solar and funding mechanisms — if you get it right there is a lot of solar financed and built,” said French of Alteris. “But it’s a fragile equation. If you get it wrong, very little of it will get built.”

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Jan Ellen Spiegel

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Pandemic eases, and complicates, legislating
by Mark Pazniokas

The legislature’s Labor and Public Employees Committee co-chairs skipped the masks, but they were very socially distant.

Health issues carried weight on the campaign trail.
by Victoria Knight | Kaiser Health News

Even with the Democrats’ newfound Senate majority, differences in health policy between the party’s moderate and progressive wings will persist.

Trump’s pardons included health care execs behind massive fraud
by Fred Schulte | Kaiser Health News

At the last minute, President Donald Trump granted pardons to several individuals convicted in huge Medicare swindles that prosecutors alleged often harmed or endangered elderly and infirm patients while fleecing taxpayers. “These aren’t just technical financial crimes. These were major, major crimes,” said Louis Saccoccio, chief executive officer of the National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association, […]

‘It’s a nightmare:’ A growing number of seniors are unable to book vaccine appointments as problems mount
by Dave Altimari and Jenna Carlesso

The state acknowledged Friday in an email to local health workers that some residents are waiting days for a callback.

Panel recommends small, inflationary pay hike for state officials
by Keith M. Phaneuf

Connecticut's part-time legislature hasn't received a pay hike since 2001. The annual base-pay for senators and representatives is $28,000.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion Miguel Cardona, who are you?
by Ann Policelli Cronin

When I ask Connecticut teachers about Miguel Cardona, those who know him or have worked with him say that he is really nice guy who knows what the challenges in our classrooms are, knows how to help teachers to improve their teaching, and respects public schools. All good. But what is his vision for teaching and learning that he will bring to the U.S. Department of Education?

Opinion Connecticut needs a strong two-party system, this Democrat says
by Edward Marcus

J.R. Romano’s recent resignation as the state’s Republican Party chair has brought into focus the need for a viable opposition party in Connecticut. It is not healthy politics when everything is totally controlled by one party:  the legislature, the governorship, and most of the major municipalities in our state.

Opinion Connecticut’s $100 million college shell game
by Stephen Adair

The plan to consolidate the 12 community colleges in Connecticut into one college with 12 campuses is called “Students First,” which is ironic because it does not fund students first.  It funds a new administration in a new, statewide bureaucracy. The Board of Regents (BOR) and the Connecticut State Colleges and Universities (CSCU) system office […]

Opinion Inconsistent television captioning is a barrier to equal access
by Jeffrey Bravin and Barbara Cassin

Our world long ago entered the age of the 24-hour news cycle, and a full understanding of the “who, what, when, where and why” of the news is critical for deaf, deafblind and hard of hearing citizens. Yet, Connecticut’s inconsistent quality of television captioning locks our community out of the complete sense of what is happening.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO