Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

Both parties hope to win by losing in gridlocked Congress

  • by Deirdre Shesgreen
  • May 31, 2011
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

WASHINGTON–The House killed a high-stakes proposal Tuesday to raise the debt ceiling, a vote that carried economic repercussions, budget implications, and political fallout. But its fate was sealed well before the roll call even began.

On the off chance the bill could have garnered a simple majority in the House, Republican leaders decided to bring the debt-ceiling proposal up for a vote under a special procedure that required a super-majority–a threshold they knew the measure couldn’t hit. And because they knew it would fail, GOP leaders also set the vote for after 6:30 p.m., when the stock markets were closed, to limit the economic gyrations that could result.

For House Republicans, Tuesday’s vote was more about proving what couldn’t pass than about debating what could. It’s a popular tactic these days–winning political leverage by creating legislative gridlock.

Just last week, Senate Democrats eagerly pressed for a vote on the House GOP’s controversial budget plan-even as they were blasting the bill’s proposal to turn Medicare into a voucher system. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid knew the 2012 budget blueprint would be defeated before he scheduled the debate.

He did it to put Senate Republicans on the spot, forcing them to go on record for or against the GOP plan, which has become deeply unpopular among seniors. In turn, Senate Republicans brought up President Barack Obama’s 2012 budget request, which, as expected, went down in flames.

Political observers say the 112th Congress has held more intentional kill-the-bill votes than most. Earlier this spring, for example, Reid orchestrated a vote on $61 billion in proposed Republican budget cuts for fiscal year 2011, just to prove that it couldn’t get anywhere. “We want the American people to know that H.R. 1 is dead, and we’ll get there,” Reid said at the time. Senate Republicans then pushed for a vote on the Democrats’ 2011 spending alternative, which was also decisively defeated.

It’s a particularly stark turnaround from the last Congress, where Democrats controlled both chambers and used their power to churn out one legislative accomplishment after another. With Congress now sharply divided-Republicans control the House, and Democrats narrowly hold the Senate-staging political votes is about the best lawmakers can do, said Norman Ornstein, an expert on Congress with the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington think tank.

“Given the political coloration of the House and Senate, there isn’t much that will pass” both chambers, he said. “So it becomes a question of whether you do something or nothing.”

Take Tuesday’s vote to raise the debt ceiling, which went down by 318-to-97. Republicans have said they wouldn’t support raising the government’s ability to borrow more money, unless it’s tied to deep budget cuts that rein in annual deficits and tackle the nation’s mounting debt. Democrats have called for a “clean vote” on the debt ceiling–one that doesn’t include any broader budgetary measures which, they argue, require a more extended and thoughtful debate.

“In any rational world, we would raise the debt ceiling and then get back to the hard work of addressing the fiscal situation. But we’re not in a rational world,” said Rep. Jim Himes, D-4th District, who has been among the most vocal advocates of a straight up-or-down vote to increase debt ceiling.

Tonight, Himes and other Democrats got their shot at that “clean” vote-thanks to a measure crafted by Rep. Dave Camp, a Republican who chairs the House Ways and Means Committee. Camp voted against his own bill, and the rest of the GOP conference did too.

House Democrats split, with 97 voting to raise the debt ceiling and 82 voting against it. Among Connecticut’s delegation, Himes voted yes, along with Reps. John Larson, D-1st District, and Rep. Chris Murphy, D-5th District. Voting no were Reps. Joe Courtney, D-2nd District, and Rosa DeLauro, D-3rd District.

So if it was set up to fail, what was the point?

“To me, it’s a very logical vote,” said ex-Rep. Chris Shays, a Republican who used to represent Connecticut’s 4th District. He said the final tally will serve as a “wake-up” call to the White House and let the president know Republicans “are serious that there’s got to be something more than a clean debt ceiling, that there’s got to be some control on spending.”

And just in time too. President Barack Obama is scheduled to meet with the House GOP caucus Wednesday, so Tuesday’s vote will be fresh in everyone’s mind as that session gets underway. And it gives Republicans extra ammunition in the closed-door budget talks being led by Vice President Joe Biden; those talks include top House and Senate leaders and are focused on crafting a budget compromise and debt-ceiling agreement.

The vote on the debt ceiling hands Republicans a new talking point in the ongoing battle for public opinion over how to grapple with the debt and spending questions. They can portray Democrats who voted for a clean debt-ceiling hike as willing to rack up more debt–and themselves as being more fiscally responsible. That could be a critical point if the budget negotiations collapse, and there’s an impasse on the debt ceiling, leading to a government default on U.S. loans.

“For Republicans now, they’re very nervous that we could have a confrontation over the debt limit, end up with a disastrous economic reaction by the markets, and that they will get blamed for being intransigent,” said Ornstein. “So what they’re trying to do now is establish the parameters-[by saying] ‘This isn’t just about raising the debt limit. It’s about dealing with the debt, and we’re going to be tough’.”

Larson called it a “a sham vote” that was “designed to create a 30-second ad.”

A similar motive was at play in the Senate last week, when Reid pushed for a vote on the House Republican budget plan. “The Democrats want to put Republicans between a rock and a hard place,” Ornstein said. “Are you going to vote for a plan that’s extremely unpopular with core senior voters? Or are you going to vote against it and enrage conservative Tea Party activists?”

Five Republicans joined Senate Democrats in quashing the measure, giving Senate Democrats a win-win. In the short-term, the vote signaled to House Republicans that such sweeping changes to Medicare are a no-go in the budget negotiations. And as a political bonus, they get campaign ad fodder to use in the next election against Republicans who supported the budget.

“They get political leverage, because it’s very clear that the Ryan plan is extremely unpopular,” Ornstein said, referring to Rep. Paul Ryan, the Wisconsin Republican and House budget chairman who drafted the GOP plan.

Shays said the Senate Democrats just wanted to “corner” their GOP counterparts and “have things to attack them on.” But even as he argued that the House GOP’s debt ceiling vote had more merit, Shays agreed that both sides were doing more posturing than legislating.

“You can’t seem to have a conversation about anything that matters anymore because it’ll be used against you,” Shays said.

Indeed, Ornstein said he expects more votes in which Senate Democrats or House Republicans vote to kill the opposing party’s plan–and then declare political victory–in the months to come. That doesn’t bode well, he said, for a budget breakthrough down the road.

Himes said it was too hard to say whether these short-term political ploys would prompt each side to dig in–or face reality and come together.

“There’s nothing inherently wrong with getting people on the record with respect to how they feel about the Ryan plan or the debt ceiling. It’s the follow-up that matters,” Himes said.

“I don’t know if these [votes] inflame partisanship or if they move us toward a compromise,” he added. “But if the market falls 1,000 points tomorrow, my guess is the Republican leadership will be a little hesitant to play with gasoline and matches again. And maybe have a real discussion rather than a political one.”

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Deirdre Shesgreen

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
As the push to reopen schools intensifies, Miguel Cardona and first lady Jill Biden travel to Meriden to show how this town did it
by Jacqueline Rabe Thomas and Adria Watson

Cardona said getting the nation's schools reopened is priority No. 1.

Bill would create sexual misconduct climate surveys for Connecticut’s colleges
by Adria Watson

The surveys would be conducted every two years.

How does the public option bill differ from Gov. Ned Lamont’s health care plan? Here’s a look at the two proposals.
by Jenna Carlesso

With the rising cost of care a central issue this legislative session, lawmakers and Gov. Ned Lamont’s administration have each moved ahead with their own plans aimed at driving down prices.

How do we show that we value teachers? By listening to them.
by Sana Shaikh

When I was graduating college, my friends’ futures were brimming with impressive labels: Google, Facebook, McKinsey, Bain, PhD, MD, Fulbrights – the list of professional excellence was seemingly never-ending. When I said that I was becoming a teacher, I got puzzled looks – “Why would you be a teacher?” “If you can’t do, teach,” I heard. The nonchalance about my professional trajectory was unsettling. What’s more? Nothing has changed in the last ten years.

Sports betting in Connecticut: Can’t all the brands just get along?
by Bill Field

When it comes to legalized sports betting in Connecticut, it’s time that all of the parties gathered in a room and hammered out an agreement that works for everyone. The adage of everyone benefiting from a rising tide hasn’t resonated in the past two and half years. 

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion How do we show that we value teachers? By listening to them.
by Sana Shaikh

When I was graduating college, my friends’ futures were brimming with impressive labels: Google, Facebook, McKinsey, Bain, PhD, MD, Fulbrights – the list of professional excellence was seemingly never-ending. When I said that I was becoming a teacher, I got puzzled looks – “Why would you be a teacher?” “If you can’t do, teach,” I heard. The nonchalance about my professional trajectory was unsettling. What’s more? Nothing has changed in the last ten years.

Opinion Sports betting in Connecticut: Can’t all the brands just get along?
by Bill Field

When it comes to legalized sports betting in Connecticut, it’s time that all of the parties gathered in a room and hammered out an agreement that works for everyone. The adage of everyone benefiting from a rising tide hasn’t resonated in the past two and half years. 

Opinion COVID-19 will push nursing home design forward
by Myles R. Brown

Over 40 percent of American deaths attributed to COVID-19 have been nursing home residents. Outdated nursing home designs contributed to the scale of this tragedy in Connecticut. Many design changes that could have prevented the spread of COVID-19 were already needed to improve the well-being of nursing home residents. The pandemic has made these issues impossible to ignore.

Opinion Let gig economy workers pursue options
by Nicole Petruzzi

In response to your February 22 story, “In an evolving economy, lawmakers take roles once played by unions:” Like many Connecticut workers, I struggle to make ends meet for my family, even when working full time. This last year has been a particularly hard time. I started looking for a part-time job to supplement my income, but I was worried that even something part-time would take away precious and needed time with my family.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO