Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

Showdown on citizen environmental action statute

  • by Jan Ellen Spiegel
  • March 9, 2012
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

Environmental and business groups are marshalling forces for an anticipated showdown Friday that pits part of the cornerstone of state environmental law against development and job creation. At issue is legislation that would restrict using environmental grounds to block development projects.

Supporters say it’s needed because the existing language in the landmark Connecticut Environmental Protection Act of 1971 is dated, too broad and easily and often abused, resulting in a hostile business climate that drives project developers to other states.

Opponents are branding it an assault on one of the state’s most important environmental laws, specifically a provision that gives citizens the right to intervene in administrative agencies when environmental issues are involved.

“This citizens’ provision has been a central part of great environmental progress in the last 40 years,” said Roger Reynolds of the advocacy group Connecticut Fund for the Environment, who plans to testify at a Planning and Development Committee hearing Friday. “I think this is a pretty serious assault.”

The issue has had developers and others grumbling for years. As it exists now, an environmental “intervenor” can object to proposed development at any stage of the process, even after it has cleared local, state or federal environmental hurdles.

Business groups contend the statute has been abused, because intervenors don’t have to provide evidence or fully identify themselves. Competitors, they claim, have been known to hide behind a guise of an environmental concern, when their real purpose is to keep a business challenge out. Business groups also claim that anti-development groups and others will simply use the statute as a delaying tactic.

“It’s an attrition thing,” said Wayne Cobleigh, an environmental consultant with GZA GeoEnvironmental Technologies. Cobleigh is also the state director of the International Council of Shopping Centers, a leading member in a coalition of groups fighting for passage of the legislation. He and others said developers just give up or their funders pull out.

Cobleigh said as a consultant, he’s been on many sides of development projects, including as an intervenor — a losing one at that — on a Simsbury housing project.

“We’re not anti-environmental, we’re anti-abuse,” he said. “You shouldn’t be using environmental laws to stop economic development; you should be using environmental laws to protect the environment.”

Legitimate environment complaints, he and others insisted, had nothing to worry about.

But Reynolds disagreed. “The long and short of it — it would single out environmental intervenors and impose a lot of restrictions on them that aren’t imposed on other litigants,” he said. “If you’re going to go after baseless or frivolous litigation, go after everybody.”

The new language specifies that intervenors “demonstrate” and not just “assert” that the action is harmful. It requires that all intervenors and their funders be named. It sets time limits for intervening actions and could force interveners to pay court and legal costs if they lose and their environmental claims are deemed to have been delay tactics or otherwise frivolous.

“Average citizens would think twice about opening their mouths,” said Lori Brown, executive director of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters, who saw the bill as another example of an ever-widening national sentiment that environmental protection is bad for business. “It would really put a chilling effect on people’s ability to weigh in.”

But developer Richard Hayes Jr. of Hayes-Kaufman said environmentalists should be embracing the changes. “It will give them more credibility,” he said. “It will take the bad apples out.”

Hayes is among many with tales of projects they say were thwarted or slowed by interventions that may not have been environmental. Hayes said he had four in the last decade, the most problematic of which is a Home Depot in Vernon, in the works since 2001, now awaiting a ruling in state Supreme Court.

Michael Goman, president of Goman + York Property Advisers in Farmington, said a third of the major shopping mall projects he’s done have been slowed by environmental interventions, though he declined to say what they were. But the bigger problem, he said, was the development opportunities lost because Connecticut’s already long permit approval system has a potential to get even longer if there are interventions.

“The big issue for us is the chilling effect it has on our ability to attract investment capital,” he said. “I have to explain the market risk and permitting risk. By the time I finish with the permitting risk they say, ‘not interested.'”

It’s that uncalculated loss that has the Connecticut Business and Industry Association supporting the legislation. “Nobody is saying get rid of the act,” said Eric Brown, an environmental lobbyist for CBIA, even though he said he’s heard complaints about it for 20 years. “I think this is a very thoughtful and legitimate effort to strike a better balance.”

Sen. Steve Cassano, D-Manchester, co-chairman of the Planning and Development Committee, said he saw abuses of the statute during his time as mayor of Manchester. “I’m hearing from people all over the state their horror stories of three to five year delays,” he said. “A lot of good projects are being hurt, and a lot of jobs are being lost as a result.”

Echoing the sentiments of many, he said in the 41 years since the Connecticut Environmental Protection Act — which he called a showpiece bill for the environment — passed, a lot of environmental regulations have been added to the books, lessening the need for the intervenor statute.

“On one hand it accomplished what it was supposed to do and on the other hand it killed a lot of things it wasn’t supposed to,” he said. “We’re just asking for transparency.”

The Fund for the Environment’s Reynolds said there are existing statues that address baseless claims, pointing to large judgments against Westfarms Mall for bringing frivolous actions against the developers of Blue Back Square in West Hartford.

He also rejected assertions by legislation supporters that the statute has been widely abused, pointing to a 2010 report by the then Department of Environmental Protection that looked into the concern and found: “CEPA intervention in the Department’s permitting process is rare.”

It went on to quantify that intervention was used 0.2 percent of the time when a department permit was required, although admitted it could not calculate its use at the local level. The report also said there was at least a perception that interventions under CEPA made the state a difficult place to do business.

Reynolds also noted that applicants have been known to abuse the permitting process, appealing zoning or wetlands rulings when there is no basis, but counting on concessions from municipalities that would rather give in than submit to expensive litigation.

Attorney Diane Whitney, who heads Pullman & Comley‘s environmental department and has also been a central proponent of the legislation, though as recently as last year called for the statute’s repeal, said she’s had clients lose development bids due to frivolous interventions.

“Intervenors need to provide evidence of pollution. I don’t think that’s unfair; I think that’s eminently fair,” she said. “I think what’s unfair is to string out an application endlessly.

“All we’re saying to intervenors is ‘tell us what the environmental harm is.’ If it is legitimate environmental harm, they will know.”

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Jan Ellen Spiegel

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Is the state’s vaccine rollout leaving behind Black and Latino residents?
by Jacqueline Rabe Thomas, Kasturi Pananjady and Jenna Carlesso

Rolling out the COVID vaccine to older residents first means it's more likely to go to white residents first.

Education is the cornerstone of democracy
by John J. Petillo

The events of January 6 represent an inflection point for our democracy and, in truth, for our concept of civil society. Much has already been written about the political and cultural tides that swept our nation toward these events —and a real understanding of their significance will not be possible for some time, in part because the reactions and responses to these events are still unfolding as I write.

A rebuttal to ‘A call to save arms’
by Tyler David Gavitt

A response to "A call to save arms: is vaccination really the solution?" published January 25: The aforementioned article, written by Genevieve Diamant, stands to do potentially significant damage to the efforts by the citizens and government of the State of Connecticut to bring under control the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Holocaust, history and today’s politics
by Avinoam Patt and Laura Hilton

On January 6 the world watched as domestic terrorists stormed the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, DC.  The pictures seared into our memories of this day are replete with symbols of hatred, racism, and extremism: The Confederate battle flag, the white power hand gesture, and the gallows erected near the Capitol reflecting pool. What many may not have noticed within this sea of white supremacy was the prominence of anti-Semitic images.

Sticker shock
by Eric W. Kuhn

It would award a modest amount to families making less than $203k in the first year of the program, ramping up to as much as $1,800 in year four. On a sliding scale, the money would also go to families making up to $682,000 a year. Really? That's 8.7 times the median household income in America.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion Education is the cornerstone of democracy
by John J. Petillo

The events of January 6 represent an inflection point for our democracy and, in truth, for our concept of civil society. Much has already been written about the political and cultural tides that swept our nation toward these events —and a real understanding of their significance will not be possible for some time, in part because the reactions and responses to these events are still unfolding as I write.

Opinion A rebuttal to ‘A call to save arms’
by Tyler David Gavitt

A response to "A call to save arms: is vaccination really the solution?" published January 25: The aforementioned article, written by Genevieve Diamant, stands to do potentially significant damage to the efforts by the citizens and government of the State of Connecticut to bring under control the COVID-19 pandemic.

Opinion The Holocaust, history and today’s politics
by Avinoam Patt and Laura Hilton

On January 6 the world watched as domestic terrorists stormed the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, DC.  The pictures seared into our memories of this day are replete with symbols of hatred, racism, and extremism: The Confederate battle flag, the white power hand gesture, and the gallows erected near the Capitol reflecting pool. What many may not have noticed within this sea of white supremacy was the prominence of anti-Semitic images.

Opinion Sticker shock
by Eric W. Kuhn

It would award a modest amount to families making less than $203k in the first year of the program, ramping up to as much as $1,800 in year four. On a sliding scale, the money would also go to families making up to $682,000 a year. Really? That's 8.7 times the median household income in America.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO