Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

Malloy proposing state funds to help parents who would lose Medicaid coverage

  • by Arielle Levin Becker
  • May 6, 2013
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

Democratic legislators effectively rejected a plan by Gov. Dannel P. Malloy to cut about 37,500 poor parents from Medicaid and leave them to buy federally subsidized health insurance from a new marketplace being established as part of health reform.

Now the Malloy administration is taking another shot at the cut, with a twist: Using state dollars to help those parents buy private insurance.

Office of Policy and Management Secretary Benjamin Barnes, Malloy’s budget director, said Monday that state funds could reduce what poor parents have to pay to buy health insurance through the new marketplace, called the exchange. That would cost the state less than continuing to cover them through HUSKY, the state’s Medicaid program, while the parents would get improved access to care through private coverage, he said.

Barnes said it’s not yet clear what the plan would cost. Cutting the parents from Medicaid was projected to save $58.8 million in the first full year it was implemented, while one estimate suggested that private health insurance premiums would cost those losing HUSKY $41.7 million.

Advocates for Medicaid recipients were skeptical of the idea, noting that the parents would still face new out-of-pocket costs for deductibles and copayments, and would lose access to the dental, vision and medical transportation services Medicaid covers.

“It’s just completely antithetical to the entire point of health reform,” said Deb Polun, director of government affairs and media relations for the Community Health Center Association of Connecticut. “We’re trying to get more people covered, and the idea of saying ‘Let’s take 37,000 people and kick them off of health insurance coverage that they already have and just hope that they buy on the exchange,’ it just goes against the entire point of health reform.”

At issue is what the state’s Medicaid program will look like once federal health reform rolls out Jan. 1.

As part of health reform, Connecticut will expand Medicaid to cover all adults earning up to 133 percent of the poverty level.

Currently, the state’s Medicaid program covers parents of minor children at higher levels — up to 185 percent of the poverty level. The federal government reimburses the state for 50 percent of the cost of their coverage.

In the past, cutting people off Medicaid to save the state money would have meant swelling the number of people without health insurance. But the Affordable Care Act — the federal law known commonly as Obamacare — provides a new avenue for people with low incomes to get coverage: The exchange — a market for buying coverage — and federal subsidies to reduce the cost of premiums, copayments and deductibles.

Malloy’s budget proposal, released in February, called for lowering the eligibility for Medicaid to the minimum required under Obamacare — 133 percent of the poverty level. That would cut off an estimated 37,500 parents currently in HUSKY, saving $5.6 million this fiscal year and $58.8 million the next.

The proposal drew intense opposition from advocates. While Medicaid is free, buying coverage through the exchange will require premiums and cost-sharing that, even with federal subsidies, would average $1,800 a year, according to projections by researchers at the University of Massachusetts Medical School Center for Health Law and Economics.

Those costs could lead an estimated 7,500 to 11,000 parents who lose Medicaid coverage to forego buying insurance, the researchers wrote in a report prepared for the Connecticut Health Foundation.

The researchers estimated that for the parents who would lose HUSKY coverage under Malloy’s plan, premiums to buy insurance through the exchange would cost $41.7 million.

Democratic legislators opted against cutting the parents from Medicaid as part of their budget proposal, released by the Appropriations Committee last month. Instead, they forecasted other savings in Medicaid, including $60 million more than the governor estimated could be achieved by stopping fraud.

Barnes said Monday that the administration’s proposal, which had not yet been formally released, would limit “the affordability problems” poor parents would face buying insurance on the exchange.

He said the cost of helping them with premium costs would be less than maintaining the parents on Medicaid. It’s unlikely the federal government would permit the state to use Medicaid funds to provide the premium assistance, Barnes said, meaning the state probably wouldn’t be able to get federal matching funds for the costs.

Barnes said buying private insurance would mean the parents get better quality coverage and would help health care providers, who typically receive higher payment rates from private insurers than from Medicaid.

“The private health insurance system is better for the health industry and for providers,” he said. “They get better reimbursement rates. Frankly, the people who are in private insurance have better access to care. I think it’s a better system. I mean, Medicaid has some wonderful features, but access to care is not among them and also, its reimbursement rates are not well-regarded by providers.”

But Sheldon Toubman, an attorney with the New Haven Legal Assistance Association and a critic of the move, was skeptical that it would save money, since the state wouldn’t get federal reimbursement for the funds.

He also said premium assistance wouldn’t solve the affordability problem since people would still face copayments and deductibles that could be hard for them to afford, making them less likely to get needed care. And while Medicaid covers dental and vision care and nonemergency medical transportation, the private plans those parents would get help buying through the exchange won’t.

“It’s a really bad idea. It’s a waste of the taxpayers’ money when the better solution is to simply keep them where they are,” Toubman said. “As we’re trying to expand coverage, we should not bet setting up a system that’s going to take away essential benefits, which is what this would do.”

Polun, who represents health centers that treat more than 150,000 Medicaid recipients, said having parents on Medicaid makes it more likely that their children will receive the same coverage. Even if the parents lose Medicaid coverage, their children will remain eligible.

Sharon Langer, interim executive director of Connecticut Voices for Children, said the benefits and risks of Medicaid are known, in contrast to the exchange, which won’t launch until the fall, and any new state subsidies. That makes it harder to know what would happen if the parents are cut off Medicaid.

Senate Minority Leader John McKinney, a Fairfield Republican who is weighing a bid for governor, said Malloy’s original proposal — having the federal government pay the bulk of the cost of the parents’ health care coverage through the exchange — was not a bad one.

McKinney noted that his caucus has not been involved in budget negotiations, but said he’d want to know the extent of the premiums and copayments the exchange plans will require.

“There’s an argument to be made that his plan would not have unfairly hurt that community, and I guess I would have to see what the amount of the subsidy was,” McKinney said. “If it eliminates the savings that the governor proposed to achieve, then I would not be supportive of it.”

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Arielle Levin Becker

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
CT hasn’t started collecting new payroll tax from state workers
by Keith M. Phaneuf

Connecticut established a new payroll tax surcharge on Jan. 1 but still isn't deducting it from state workers' paychecks.

Mohegans agree to sharing sports betting with CT Lottery
by Mark Pazniokas

The CT Lottery, Mohegan Sun and, presumably, Foxwoods Resort casinos could offer sports betting and online gambling.

Live and on TV, gambling negotiations go public
by Mark Pazniokas

The Lamont administration says it is close to a deal to legalize sports betting and bring casino games online.

Lamont’s budget offers another round of tax amnesty
by Keith M. Phaneuf

Gov. Ned Lamont’s proposal waives penalties and caps interest at 3% over each of the next two fiscal years.

Will getting teachers vaccinated get students back in school full time? It might not be that easy
by Jacqueline Rabe Thomas, Kasturi Pananjady and Adria Watson

Districts will have to convince parents and students that in-person learning is safe and that students won't bring COVID-19 home.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion Fitness is part of Connecticut’s COVID solution
by David Humphrey

Based on what we now know about infection rates and transmission, it is more apparent than ever before that gyms, fitness centers, and the physical and mental health benefits of exercise are essential to help our state get through the months ahead.

Opinion Connecticut can’t afford state government-run health insurance
by Mike Licamele

As much as I support strengthening and improving healthcare, I do not believe SB 842 is the way to do that. Instead of trying to force Connecticut residents into a new, government-controlled healthcare system, lawmakers should focus on improving our existing one by building on what’s working and continuing to address lowering costs, not raising taxes

Opinion Disabled, marginalized, stalled and walled
by Doris Maldonado

As a bilingual health information specialist for PATH P2P Family Voices CT and National Family Voices Cultural Responsiveness Telehealth Team, I offer more than professional expertise as well as despair for the marginalized within marginalized communities. I am a Latina with disabilities, adoptive mother of 17-year-old twins with special needs and a thriving toddler.

Opinion The marijuana legalization debate must be based on facts
by Will Jones III

In response to my earlier piece on why Connecticut lawmakers should reject marijuana commercialization,  Brendan Ruberry wrote a rebuttal that, on its face seems scathing, but to be clear, the attempted rebuttal falls flat and well off the mark.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO