Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

Aetna withdraws from state’s health insurance exchange

  • by Arielle Levin Becker
  • August 5, 2013
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

Aetna has withdrawn its proposal to participate in Connecticut’s health insurance exchange, becoming the second carrier in recent weeks to exit the new marketplace.

The Hartford-based insurer indicated it did not believe the price modifications requested by state regulators would allow it to bring in enough money in premiums.

“We have spent considerable time identifying those states in which we can be competitive and add the most value to the market,” Aetna spokeswoman Susan Millerick said in a statement Monday. “As a result of our analysis, we have reluctantly concluded that we will withdraw our Individual Exchange filings in Connecticut for 2014.”

“Unfortunately, we believe the modifications to the rates filed by Aetna will not allow us to collect enough premiums to cover the cost of the plans and meet the service expectations of our customers,” Millerick said.

Aetna also recently withdrew plans to offer coverage through exchanges in Maryland and Georgia. Aetna currently covers about 32,000 people through Connecticut’s individual insurance market, and plans to remain in the market outside the exchange.

Health insurance exchanges are new state-level marketplaces for individuals and small businesses to buy coverage as part of the federal health reform law. They will begin accepting enrollment Oct. 1 for health plans that take effect Jan. 1. Connecticut’s exchange is known as Access Health CT.

Aetna initially planned to offer coverage through Access Health for individuals — people who buy insurance on their own — but not for small groups. Millerick noted that Aetna’s proposal for individual-market rates was submitted before the insurer acquired Coventry Health Care, a Maryland-based company.

Aetna’s departure leaves three insurers with plans to offer coverage through Access Health’s individual market: ConnectiCare Benefits, newcomer HealthyCT, and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, the state’s largest insurer.

There are also three carriers expected to offer coverage through the small-group exchange: Anthem, HealthyCT and UnitedHealthcare. ConnectiCare Benefits withdrew its proposal last month, saying it wanted to focus on the individual market.

Even without Aetna, Access Health CEO Kevin Counihan said, consumers will have several choices. Aetna’s decision showed that the exchange and Connecticut Insurance Department had been rigorous in working to keep rates down, he added, noting that several other carriers have also reduced rates because of the review process.

As for Aetna, Counihan said, “I think that it represents a business decision by a major insurer that is taking a reasonably cautious, wait-and-see approach to entering exchange markets nationally.”

Access Health released a statement from Lt. Gov. Nancy Wyman, who leads the exchange board, minimizing the effect of Aetna’s departure.

“The bottom line is that this is a business decision by Aetna that changes nothing for Connecticut consumers and businesses,” she said. “People will still be able to choose from a very comprehensive range of quality, affordable coverage options offered through [Access Health CT].”

The insurance department must review all proposed rates for coverage offered through the exchange. It must determine whether the premiums charged will be enough to cover medical costs and ensure that they’re not excessive.

Correspondence between the insurance department and Aetna from last month reflects some disagreement about the way Aetna’s proposed rates were calculated. Insurance Department Actuary Paul Lombardo asked Aetna to reduce its projection of how much medical spending would increase from 10 percent to 8.5 percent, and asked the company to remove another assumption that would have raised rates.

A week later, Lombardo wrote to the company, “Please be advised that after further internal discussion, the Department stands by it’s original change request.” He asked Aetna to “make the appropriate revisions” and submit updated rates.

An actuarial firm working for Access Health, Wakely Consulting Group, also pointed to assumptions in Aetna’s rate proposals that stood out from the other insurers.

Aetna assumed that the health of the people covered by its plans through the exchange would be dramatically worse than what the other companies projected. Aetna’s calculation of how the health of the new customers would affect costs was 10 times greater than what Anthem projected, according to Wakely.

The company also included an 8.1 percent “durational adjustment” in its rate proposal, which Wakely’s analysis said was described as intended to affect the percentage of premium costs spent on medical care. Lombardo, the insurance department’s actuary, asked Aetna to remove it, saying the department wasn’t permitting that sort of adjustment in the first year of pricing for the exchange plans.

Unlike the other carriers, Aetna also included in its rate proposals an assumption that the newly insured would use more medical services to make up for years of going without care.

In addition, Aetna’s rate projections assumed that health care spending would rise by 10 percent, which the Wakely report said was at the top of the range used in rate filings for the individual market. And Wakely noted that it was higher than national projections about health care spending increases, which range from 2.8 percent to 7.9 percent. That projection in Aetna’s filing was one of the ones that Lombardo asked the company to reduce.

“Please be assured this is not a step taken lightly, and was made as part of national review of our Exchange strategy,” Aetna Senior Actuary Bruce T. Campbell wrote in a letter to the insurance department Friday. “We recognize there are many unknowns for all of us in this environment and we sincerely appreciate all of the hard work you and your team have put into making the Connecticut Exchange a success. We look forward to continuing to work together and will evaluate exchange participation in future years.”

Under the exchange’s rules, Aetna would have to wait until 2016 to sell plans through Access Health.

Counihan said health reform is disruptive to the insurance industry, and it’s not surprising that some carriers would choose to pull back from states’ exchanges. He noted that Aetna has a relatively small share of the individual-market business in Connecticut.

But Counihan added that there are also new insurers in the state, including HealthyCT, a nonprofit that was created with federal funds under a program created by the health reform law. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, a Massachusetts company, is also planning to enter the Connecticut market.

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Arielle Levin Becker

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
AG says COVID showed Connecticut that it needs a tougher price-gouging law
by Mark Pazniokas

Connecticut's attorney general said the state's price-gouging law was no match for COVID profiteers

House Democratic leaders want to repeal CT’s ‘poverty tax’
by Keith M. Phaneuf

House Democratic leaders want to effectively end Connecticut’s longstanding practice of placing liens on the homes of former welfare recipients.

Is the state’s vaccine rollout leaving behind Black and Latino residents?
by Jacqueline Rabe Thomas, Kasturi Pananjady and Jenna Carlesso

Rolling out the COVID vaccine to older residents first means it's more likely to go to white residents first.

Education is the cornerstone of democracy
by John J. Petillo

The events of January 6 represent an inflection point for our democracy and, in truth, for our concept of civil society. Much has already been written about the political and cultural tides that swept our nation toward these events —and a real understanding of their significance will not be possible for some time, in part because the reactions and responses to these events are still unfolding as I write.

A rebuttal to ‘A call to save arms’
by Tyler David Gavitt

A response to "A call to save arms: is vaccination really the solution?" published January 25: The aforementioned article, written by Genevieve Diamant, stands to do potentially significant damage to the efforts by the citizens and government of the State of Connecticut to bring under control the COVID-19 pandemic.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion Education is the cornerstone of democracy
by John J. Petillo

The events of January 6 represent an inflection point for our democracy and, in truth, for our concept of civil society. Much has already been written about the political and cultural tides that swept our nation toward these events —and a real understanding of their significance will not be possible for some time, in part because the reactions and responses to these events are still unfolding as I write.

Opinion A rebuttal to ‘A call to save arms’
by Tyler David Gavitt

A response to "A call to save arms: is vaccination really the solution?" published January 25: The aforementioned article, written by Genevieve Diamant, stands to do potentially significant damage to the efforts by the citizens and government of the State of Connecticut to bring under control the COVID-19 pandemic.

Opinion The Holocaust, history and today’s politics
by Avinoam Patt and Laura Hilton

On January 6 the world watched as domestic terrorists stormed the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, DC.  The pictures seared into our memories of this day are replete with symbols of hatred, racism, and extremism: The Confederate battle flag, the white power hand gesture, and the gallows erected near the Capitol reflecting pool. What many may not have noticed within this sea of white supremacy was the prominence of anti-Semitic images.

Opinion Sticker shock
by Eric W. Kuhn

It would award a modest amount to families making less than $203k in the first year of the program, ramping up to as much as $1,800 in year four. On a sliding scale, the money would also go to families making up to $682,000 a year. Really? That's 8.7 times the median household income in America.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO