“You’ve got to be very careful if you don’t know where you are going, because you might not get there.”  

— Yogi Berra.

Businesses and high wage earners are leaving the state, and there are increased taxes on the middle class. No wonder people at all levels of the economic ladder have lost faith in their government. With such an anti-business climate, and so many broken promises, GE may not be the only company headquarters to leave.

Toni Boucher

Major employers are feeling that their best interests are not being served by Hartford and are looking for a better business environment elsewhere.  In fact, the state’s largest business, UTC, is now eyeing the door for Massachusetts, seeking a friendlier business climate just over the border. It moved its Carrier headquarters out of Connecticut already.

The promise to install tolls only on trucks:

One of the most controversial and hotly debated proposals in Hartford is the reinstalling of tolls. The governor promised tolls would only apply to trucks, but has reneged. The regressive toll proposal affects all vehicles on every major highway.  The new administration has vowed to call a special session to vote on a toll bill against massive opposition (lacking the votes to pass it during regular session). Note that Connecticut has double the taxes than other states with tolls such as the car property tax.  *Tolls would also add significantly to the cost of doing business.

The promise to lockbox transportation funds:

The voters passed a constitutional amendment to lockbox all transportation funds to protect them from diversion. However, the budget diverts $170 million in new car sales tax slated for special transportation to general fund. So much for the lockbox!

The promise to balance the budget:

The budget just passed is based on $450 million savings that do not exist and on union contracts yet to be negotiated and approved by the unions.  The budget depends on pension deferral and healthcare plan changes still not approved. There is more spending of over 5 percent in just the next two years.

The promise to secure union concessions:

The administration was unable to secure the cost-of-living-adjustment savings budgeted. Instead it approved 12 contracts that included 19,000 bonuses and added $100 million more to the budget.  The contracts locked in higher wages and benefits of up to 11 percent and job protection for up to 10 years in some the highest government sector costs in the U.S. Fringe costs are so high that our universities can no longer pay them and have asked them to be paid by the general fund.

The promise to reform pension and unfunded liabilities:

Connecticut’s pensions are 30 percent funded.  They should be 80 percent funded.  Pension and debt obligations are one-third of state expenditures and keep expanding.  Instead of converting to 401 contribution plans, the status quo has been maintained by the administration.  It is refinancing teachers’ pension and pushing out payments to 2023 at huge interest costs to taxpayers of $27 billion. This is the second time in three years that pension payments have been refinanced.

The promise to put Connecticut on a “debt diet:”

The administration gave big money for union raises and gifts to some legislators’ favorite organizations to get votes for the budget.  The Democratic leadership passed spending millions of dollars in bonding for three little leagues, the YMCA, 4-H clubs, one Boy Scout troop, farmers market, arts festivals,  theater grants and tennis programs.

Yet, they could not give struggling human- service nonprofits  the vital funding needed to function that they pleaded for.  The final budget does not include any increase for the nonprofit community that serves 500,000 people through some 1,200 contracts with the state.  This hard-working group takes care of the most vulnerable population in our state.

Other broken promises include the diversion of tobacco settlement and Green Energy funds and this year’s threat to our state parks programs to plug budgets shortfall.  Furthermore, the income, real estate, gasoline percentage tax, inheritance and gift and many other taxes were pledged to be temporary taxes but were made permanent.  No wonder people have grown distrustful.

Pioneer Institute advises the state of Massachusetts, “Connecticut provides a real-world, sobering example of how a seemingly attractive tax-the-rich scheme can backfire badly on a state, turning rosy projections of revenue gains to real-life losses, and damaging business confidence in the process.”

Take heed, those who govern.  The consequences of broken promises are not only loss of trust but loss of top companies and jobs, jobs that Connecticut desperately needs to keep.  Change your ways and keep your promises.  We can still turn things around and restore Connecticut, but time is running out.

Toni Boucher is a Connecticut businesswoman and former state senator, state representative, state board of education member, selectman and board of education chair.

CTViewpoints welcomes rebuttal or opposing views to this and all its commentaries. Read our guidelines and submit your commentary here.

Join the Conversation

9 Comments

  1. What a Debbie Downer! Imagine; Boucher asking Connecticut to consider the consequences of actions and the lack of a long term vision!!?? It’s ever so much easier to just react without thinking!! No wonder she lost her election! FACTS? TRUTH? Who needs them?!

  2. For a state that prides itself on having an educated work force, they keep on voting in the Democrats, even after the previous Gov and statehouse dug the hole even deeper. More taxation is not the answer, and the whole “Lockbox” vote to keep the money for transportation is a joke, no toll money will ever be used for transportation.

    1. Don’t blame unions for seeking a living wage for hard work. Why don’t you blame your Conservatives & Republicans who have promoted off-shoring of our American industries and the Billionaires who have been plundering corporations rendering them a shell of what they once were. Why don’t you blame Corporate demands for local and state tax exemptions for the privilege of allowing all of the wealthy bigwigs to skim millions from corporate profits while laying off workers — while blaming unions for actions that unions had no part in taking. Scapegoating unions seems to be the rightwing mantra — but it is a false narrative, a false diatribe, a false accusation. If it weren’t for unions, 99% of American workers would be working part-time jobs paying less than minimum wage, all of the while as corporate CEOs & Billionaires pocket their robber-baron ill-gotten gains.

      1. Unions have driven this state into insolvency. The only “revenue” to pay for union salaries, benefits and pensions comes from the private sector. Every cent is paid for by private sector taxes. And the salaries, benefits and pension are all way out of market. It isn’t a question of a “living wage”, its rigging the system so that public service employees are immune from the same economic forces that the private sector employees face and from which they are paid. If the state were a private company, 30-40% of its employees would have been laid off five years ago.

        Rather than be jealous of the handful of millionaires and billionaires, why don’t you try and be one?

        And once those that are left in Connecticut, leave, there won’t be any money to pay for exorbitant pensions, free health care, no layoffs and out of market salaries. By the way, pensions haven’t been around for the private sector for 20+ years.

      2. It’s not the union members, but the leadership has no problem with foreign visa guest workers outsourcing. They only care about their personal power and compensation. Democrats and establishment Republicans are anti-American citizen!

  3. Surely the CT GOP gets tired of being obstructionist rather than offering genuine thoughtful and most importantly constructive ideas.

    1. Surely the CT Dems get tired of hearing and rejecting the reasons why their policies are killing this state.

  4. Toni, toni, toni, You keep spiting the same lies. GE did not left because of taxes why is so difficult for you to understand.

Leave a comment
Cancel reply