Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

Prospects for early retirement program could hinge on a murky legal issue

  • by Keith M. Phaneuf
  • April 23, 2010
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

A key piece of Gov. M. Jodi Rell’s plan to close the deficit in next year’s budget hinges on a legal question with a murky answer: Can the state offer its employees retirement incentives without their unions’ approval?

Rell’s budget office says yes. The unions say no, and add that they have “deep concerns” about an early retirement program that Rell proposed to cut $65 million from a $726 million deficit projected for the 2010-2011 fiscal year.

The State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition, a panel of top union leaders that negotiates pension and health benefits for most state workers and retirees, says another retirement incentive program could harm public services, overburden an already-thin work force, and weaken an already under-funded pension plan.

“Any such plan can only be approved through direct negotiations with the coalition’s unions,” SEBAC said in a statement.

“We have no doubt that if we went to a federal court and sought a declaratory ruling” to affirm this position, “we would win,” Hartford lawyer Daniel Livingston, SEBAC’s chief negotiator, added Thursday.

But state government did offer a retirement incentive program without union permission just seven years ago.

According to an Office of Legislative Research report, 4,650 employees retired under the 2003 program, which was open to workers age 52 and older with at least 10 years of experience. Depending upon when they were hired, normal retirement age for most state workers is either age 55 or 60.

At the heart of the disagreement is language in the 20-year contract signed by the state and SEBAC in 1997 that requires health and pension benefits to be negotiated. That deal even spells out a process for the two sides to negotiate any extra retirement incentives.

In addition, Section 5-278 of the General Statutes stipulates that whenever a state law – such as legislation creating a retirement incentive program – conflicts with a labor agreement on “matters appropriate to collective bargaining… the terms of such agreement shall prevail.”

SEBAC challenged the 2003 retirement program before the State Board of Mediation and Arbitration, arguing that while the program expanded benefits to some workers, it also drained dollars from an under-funded state pension program, and increased work burdens for other employees.

Arbitrator Peter R. Blum concluded that the unions’ right to negotiate benefits was impaired by the early retirement program, but that the damage was “reasonable.” He also wrote that the early retirement program, which saved more than $160 million per year, was part of a comprehensive budget deficit-reduction plan and “necessary to serve an important public purpose under the circumstances of the severe fiscal crisis.”

Oddly, both state government and the union appealed Blum’s decision in Superior Court. The state argued the matter was not a proper subject for labor arbitration, while the unions objected to Blum’s conclusion that the 2003 program was legal.

The court ultimately ruled against both sides, affirming the legality of the program but also declaring that retirement incentive programs could be challenged in arbitration.

Both the state and union leaders, dissatisfied with aspects of the arbitration decision and the court case, signed an agreement in 2004 pledging not to pursue further appeals, and more importantly, not to use the cases as precedents in the future.

But were the state to unilaterally offer a retirement incentive again, and were the union to pursue arbitration again, would another arbitrator conclude that the pension fund was too severely depleted, or that the state’s fiscal situation is dire enough?

The legislature’s Office of Fiscal Analysis is projecting a $3.88 billion deficit, a shortfall equal to more than 20 percent of this fiscal year’s budget, for 2011-12. OFA also projects a $725.7 million deficit for the 2010-11 year, which starts July 1. About $65 million in savings from a 2010 early retirement program is part of Rell’s plan to fill that gap.

The governor’s budget director, Office of Policy and Management Secretary Robert L. Genuario, said Thursday that despite that 2004 agreement, the administration still believes the governor and legislature can offer a retirement incentive program without union approval.

But Genuario was quick to add that given the murky legal history surrounding retirement incentive programs, “we believe that the better practice, if it can be accomplished, would be to do this in the way of discussions.”

Rell’s office on Thursday invited SEBAC officials to begin talks about retirement incentives, he said, adding he expects discussions to begin within the next week.

The governor’s relationship with state unions hit the skids in late March after labor leaders said her request for another wage-and-benefit concession package showed “cynical disrespect” to workers.

Rell, who reached a concession deal last year that trimmed wages and benefits and featured other concessions in exchange for a two-year ban on layoffs, asked this time for four more furlough days, deferral of one cost-of-living raise, cancellation of longevity bonuses for senior workers, and the right to impose layoffs under certain conditions.

Legislative leaders had mixed reactions Thursday to the prospect of voting on retirement incentives not supported by union leadership.

Democrats, who traditionally enjoy the support of organized labor in Connecticut, control both the House and Senate, and House Speaker Christopher G. Donovan, D-Meriden, said his staff still is reviewing the retirement proposals to determine if they make sense.

“We are hearing that some departments are already strained from the last retirement plan,” offered in 2009, he said. Rell’s latest proposal estimates as many as 3,000 workers could retire, and only half of their posts would be refilled. “That’s a lot of people. It’s a concern.”

SEBAC wrote in a statement Wednesday that “years of hiring freezes and the 2009 retirement incentive have already left the state dangerously understaffed in core areas such as public safety, health and education.”

But House Minority Leader Lawrence F. Cafero, R-Norwalk, whose caucus also has proposed an early retirement program for 2010, said it’s essential to reduce state government’s nearly 55,000-employee workforce now to allow for agency consolidations that are necessary to balance the next budget.

“There’s nothing in the law that prevents us from enhancing a benefit” to state workers, Cafero said, adding he doesn’t accept SEBAC’s argument that government is understaffed. “I have not read an account or heard an account where the public health or safety of a citizen has been put in harm’s way because we have less state employees.”

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Keith M. Phaneuf

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Health issues carried weight on the campaign trail.
by Victoria Knight | Kaiser Health News

Even with the Democrats’ newfound Senate majority, differences in health policy between the party’s moderate and progressive wings will persist.

Trump’s pardons included health care execs behind massive fraud
by Fred Schulte | Kaiser Health News

At the last minute, President Donald Trump granted pardons to several individuals convicted in huge Medicare swindles that prosecutors alleged often harmed or endangered elderly and infirm patients while fleecing taxpayers. “These aren’t just technical financial crimes. These were major, major crimes,” said Louis Saccoccio, chief executive officer of the National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association, […]

‘It’s a nightmare:’ A growing number of seniors are unable to book vaccine appointments as problems mount
by Dave Altimari and Jenna Carlesso

The state acknowledged Friday in an email to local health workers that some residents are waiting days for a callback.

Panel recommends small, inflationary pay hike for state officials
by Keith M. Phaneuf

Connecticut's part-time legislature hasn't received a pay hike since 2001. The annual base-pay for senators and representatives is $28,000.

Police task force seeks wider applicant pool for watchdog role
by Kelan Lyons

The task force sent four recommendations — and two that didn't get unanimous approval— to lawmakers for the 2021 session.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion Miguel Cardona, who are you?
by Ann Policelli Cronin

When I ask Connecticut teachers about Miguel Cardona, those who know him or have worked with him say that he is really nice guy who knows what the challenges in our classrooms are, knows how to help teachers to improve their teaching, and respects public schools. All good. But what is his vision for teaching and learning that he will bring to the U.S. Department of Education?

Opinion Connecticut needs a strong two-party system, this Democrat says
by Edward Marcus

J.R. Romano’s recent resignation as the state’s Republican Party chair has brought into focus the need for a viable opposition party in Connecticut. It is not healthy politics when everything is totally controlled by one party:  the legislature, the governorship, and most of the major municipalities in our state.

Opinion Connecticut’s $100 million college shell game
by Stephen Adair

The plan to consolidate the 12 community colleges in Connecticut into one college with 12 campuses is called “Students First,” which is ironic because it does not fund students first.  It funds a new administration in a new, statewide bureaucracy. The Board of Regents (BOR) and the Connecticut State Colleges and Universities (CSCU) system office […]

Opinion Inconsistent television captioning is a barrier to equal access
by Jeffrey Bravin and Barbara Cassin

Our world long ago entered the age of the 24-hour news cycle, and a full understanding of the “who, what, when, where and why” of the news is critical for deaf, deafblind and hard of hearing citizens. Yet, Connecticut’s inconsistent quality of television captioning locks our community out of the complete sense of what is happening.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO