Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

Debate pits energy efficiency fund against utility surcharge

  • by Keith M. Phaneuf
  • May 16, 2011
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

A better-than-anticipated financial outlook for the current fiscal year has the state in the position of undoing some of the controversial measures it took in 2010 to balance the budget–but a debate is brewing over just what the priorities should be.

When the Senate adopted a measure last week that would reduce planned borrowing–which once stood at $956 million–down to $137 million, its top priority is first to restore an energy efficiency fund that was raided to help balance state finances. After that is resolved, according to the Senate action, any funds left over could be used to reduce or end an unpopular surcharge on electric bills.

But Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s administration wants to flip those priorities, first mitigating or ending outright the charge on Connecticut Light & Power Co. customers’ bills, and then shoring up the Energy Conservation and Load Management Fund.

Further complicating matters, some lawmakers still want to redress what they say is an inequity in the surcharge: the fact that CL&P customers have been paying the charge since January, while it has yet to be applied to customers of United Illuminating or municipal electricity cooperatives.

 

“It’s still a little premature. We don’t know what the exact outcome will be yet,” Sen. Eileen Daily, D-Westbrook, co-chairwoman of the Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee, said.

The Democrat-controlled legislature and then-Gov. M. Jodi Rell, a Republican, had enacted a three-pronged plan last May to borrow $956 million, raise another $40 million, and place the $141.6 million in annual debt service for the next eight years on the shoulders of energy consumers:

  • A charge of 0.379 cents per kilowatt hour–or $2.42 per month for the typical residential customer using 700 kilowatt hours per month–was imposed solely on CL&P customers starting in January and running through June 30. It raised $40 million that went directly into the General Fund.
  • A charge of 0.47 cents per kilowatt hour – or $2.65 per month for the typical residential customer – took its place in July, again on CL&P customers only. It was designed to raise $112.9 million per year for debt service. Only after October 2013, though, the rate on CL&P customers would be reduced and the 324,000 customers of United Illuminating, the state’s other major electric utility also would begin contributing.
  • And $28.7 million would be drawn annually from the $82 million reserved for the energy conservation fund, which helps households cut their heating bills while creating hundreds of energy efficiency jobs.

Shortly after last May’s budget vote, a last-minute increase in the projected 2010 budget surplus reduced the borrowing target needed to balance 2011 finances from $956 million to $646 million.

And the Senate voted last week to dedicate the $509 million surplus Comptroller Kevin Lembo is forecasting for the current year to lower that borrowing target down to $137 million.

It is still unclear whether the debt still would be financed over eight years and what the new annual payment would be, though it presumably would be far less than $141.6 million.

The Senate bill stipulates that the first entity to be spared as the debt requirement drops would be the energy conservation fund. Daily said that if only $137 million were borrowed – only about one-seventh of the $956 million target originally planned – the annual debt payment would shrink enough not only to spare the energy conservation fund from further raids, but also to curtail the utility bill surcharge.

But the Malloy administration has said its priorities are the reserve: first is to reduce or end that surcharge, and then to shore up the energy conservation fund.

The governor’s budget director, Office of Policy and Management Secretary Benjamin Barnes, has said the energy conservation fund has laudable goals but isn’t the only energy efficiency fund within the state budget.

Malloy campaigned strongly last fall on the need to control excessively high electricity rates in Connecticut.

One of the reasons the matter might not be resolved until the final days of the regular legislative session, which ends June 8, is because it might be possible – with a few budget adjustments or if the surplus grows even more – to eliminate the borrowing entirely and please all groups, Daily said.

But even if that is the case, the utility surcharge also sparked considerably acrimony during last fall’s state campaign season and some feel it already has done damage that needs to be repaired.

Southington Republican Joseph Markley, who was elected to the Senate, sued to block the Department of Public Utility Control from implementing the fee. Markley lost in Superior Court and his appeal was dismissed this past week by the Connecticut Supreme Court, which cited the state’s sovereign immunity in its decision.

“My underlying argument has not been refuted: the tax is inequitable, and it is improperly administered,” Markley said.  “Those charges have never been addressed-instead, my case has again been dismissed on a legal technicality.”

Richard A. Soderman, a spokesman for Northeast Utilities, CL&P’s parent company, said the Senate measure approved represents progress, “but we still feel there is more to be made.

Soderman said it is important to restore the energy conservation fund, but added that NU also believes that the utility surcharge – though it never should have been applied in the first place – unfairly placed all initial burdens solely on CL&P customers.

Sen. Paul Doyle, D-Wethersfield, agrees, and said Thursday that “there’s a question of fairness that needs to be addressed,” even if the borrowing no longer is necessary. CL&P customers have been paying in since January, and either they deserve a refund, or customers served by other utilities should be charged, he said. “I’m not letting it go.”

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Keith M. Phaneuf

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Why it took days for one CVS store in CT to stop vaccinating New Yorkers
by Dave Altimari

By the time state officials arrived at a Waterford CVS on Feb. 4 to investigate reports that New Yorkers were getting the COVID-19 vaccine, the […]

From UHart faculty: All Hawks deserve our support
by Amanda Freeman, Katharine Owens and Rachel Walker

Last week college sports fans in Connecticut were roiled by some startling news. The University of Hartford has been privately considering a move from NCAA Division I to Division III. Grappling with the financial implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, the University commissioned a “feasibility study” from the consulting company CarrSports. The confidential report concluded that the “current Division I-funding model is not viable and cannot achieve the goal of becoming more self-sustaining.”

Lessons learned: Education is not enough to combat anti-vaccine propaganda
by Kerri M. Raissian and Jody Terranova

The Connecticut House of Representatives just passed legislation to end the religious exemption for the school vaccination requirement ( HB6423).  The Connecticut state Senate must act quickly to do the same.  If passed, Connecticut would require medically able school children to receive vaccines as recommended by the CDC.

Biden ought not overuse the term ‘infrastructure’
by Eric W. Kuhn

President Joe Biden's redefinition of the word "bipartisan" is wise, even necessary. Measures that have majority support among regular folks throughout the country-- say, universal background checks for firearms purchases-- have "bipartisan" support because lots of citizens of both major parties approve: that makes sense.

Please let restaurants and bars recover from the pandemic. Oppose HB 6502
by Robert D’Eliseo and Don Mancini

For the first time in almost a year, we can see a light at the end of the tunnel of the COVID-19 pandemic. But that does not mean we are out of the tunnel yet – and these coming months will be critical for the recovery. That is why this is not the time for the Connecticut General Assembly to push the polystyrene ban (HB 6502) they seem on track toward passing.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion From UHart faculty: All Hawks deserve our support
by Amanda Freeman, Katharine Owens and Rachel Walker

Last week college sports fans in Connecticut were roiled by some startling news. The University of Hartford has been privately considering a move from NCAA Division I to Division III. Grappling with the financial implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, the University commissioned a “feasibility study” from the consulting company CarrSports. The confidential report concluded that the “current Division I-funding model is not viable and cannot achieve the goal of becoming more self-sustaining.”

Opinion Lessons learned: Education is not enough to combat anti-vaccine propaganda
by Kerri M. Raissian and Jody Terranova

The Connecticut House of Representatives just passed legislation to end the religious exemption for the school vaccination requirement ( HB6423).  The Connecticut state Senate must act quickly to do the same.  If passed, Connecticut would require medically able school children to receive vaccines as recommended by the CDC.

Opinion Biden ought not overuse the term ‘infrastructure’
by Eric W. Kuhn

President Joe Biden's redefinition of the word "bipartisan" is wise, even necessary. Measures that have majority support among regular folks throughout the country-- say, universal background checks for firearms purchases-- have "bipartisan" support because lots of citizens of both major parties approve: that makes sense.

Opinion Please let restaurants and bars recover from the pandemic. Oppose HB 6502
by Robert D’Eliseo and Don Mancini

For the first time in almost a year, we can see a light at the end of the tunnel of the COVID-19 pandemic. But that does not mean we are out of the tunnel yet – and these coming months will be critical for the recovery. That is why this is not the time for the Connecticut General Assembly to push the polystyrene ban (HB 6502) they seem on track toward passing.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s […]

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is […]

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO