Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Money
  • Election 2020
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Money
    Election 2020
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

Backers of concession deal struggle to sell its long-term benefits

  • by Mark Pazniokas
  • July 28, 2011
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy says the challenge of winning ratification of a new concession deal is plain to anyone with his habit of religiously reading online comments. No one, he says, seems to see the disaster just over the horizon if ratification fails.

The impetus for the concessions is a short-term crisis: How to fill a $1.6 billion gap in state’s current biennial budget. But Malloy, backed by union leaders, says the real value of the deal lies in the structural changes that could stabilize finances and benefits for a decade or more.

It’s been a tough sell.

One common refrain found in the comments posted by state employees is why not simply address the shortfall in the current budget with a pay freeze and furlough day? Why mess with health and pension changes that seem to be the biggest obstacles to ratification?

“If he is serious about being a leader he will drop the pension and health BS that isn’t going to save anything of significance in the next 2 years, and get to work on wages and furlough days – that’s real hard calculable savings that will fix his issue for this budget,” one state worker said in commenting on a Mirror story. “We can talk about the other stuff when time is not of the essence.”

“This deal is not needed to solve the budget deficit,” said another state worker. “Everyone is willing to take furlough days to get the needed savings.”

“We have a deal until 2017,” said a third. “Fix it then.”

Malloy said that approach would produce another stopgap solution, inviting exactly what some workers fear: future demands for more givebacks.

“Under that scenario you just bump from crisis to crisis to crisis,” Malloy said in an interview. “I can’t enter into a four-year, no-layoff clause and not bring about the structural changes, which everybody knows has to take place. It doesn’t mean they want it to take place.”

Too many state employees are judging the tentative agreement against what they have now, not what they could reasonably expect to have in 2017, when the current 20-year health and pension deal negotiated in 1997 by Gov. John G. Rowland expires, Malloy said..

Faced with unfunded liabilities for retiree health care, the trend is for states and municipalities to share more of those costs with employees and retirees or, in extreme cases, try to abolish the coverage.

“The benefit most at risk for state workers is retiree healthcare. Not only have most workers in the private sector lost access to coverage in retirement, more and more public employees are losing theirs, too,” said Ron McLellan, a 30-year state employee and the president of Local 511 of CEUI/SEIU.

A survey by the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities found that a strong trend of member municipalities negotiating contracts that either limit retiree health coverage or greatly share the cost with the beneficiaries.

In Norwalk, the Board of Education tried and failed in an arbitration case to eliminate retiree health coverage. It is not expected to be the last government entity to make the attempt.

In New Haven, the cost of employee benefits has been at the center of a bitter concession fight with John DeStefano, the liberal Democratic mayor who was the Democratic nominee for governor in 2006.

“Nationally, it used to be a Republican perspective,” said Jim Finley, the president of the conference. “There is now a bipartisan recognition, because the numbers don’t lie. Almost every chief executive now understands the need for reform.”

But Malloy says he sees little evidence that state employees see the near-certainty that their retirement benefits will shrink or grow more expensive in 2017, unless concessions are ratified now.

The problem, he says, was crystallized in another comment posted on The Mirror’s site over the weekend, after the administration and unions announced a new tentative agreement.

“I am 45 and have 11 years of state service…My plan all along was to work until age 55 and retire with (reduced) pension/health benefits…With this new deal I will have to work 3 years longer for less money even though I had a union contract…If this plan passes the early retirement penalties will be double…I don’t know what to do.”

It was signed, “state employee.”

“That’s the issue right there, that people in government believe they should have the ability to retire at 55,” Malloy said.

Normal retirement age for most state employees is 60 after 25 years of service or 62 with at least 10 years. State employees now have the right to retire at 55, but they pay the penalty of seeing their monthly benefit reduced by 3 percent for each year they leave early.

Under the concession deal, the penalty would double to 6 percent, most likely forcing employees to work longer, taking some pressure off the retiree health system, which provides primary coverage for state retirees until they become eligible for Medicare at 65.

“That will have a behavioral effect,” Malloy said.

In 2022, the normal retirement ages also would increase to 63 with 25 years of service and 65 with 10 years of service.

Malloy says he is the first governor in decades to take a long-term view of the state’s benefits and its revenue structure, which should give state employees some confidence that giveback demands will not become a biennial event.

His predecessor, Gov. M. Jodi Rell, negotiated a concession deal in 2009, which is one of the objections some employees have to the current deal. “Do you all think this is gonna be the end?” another employee said in a posted comment. “In a few years the state will be back for more.”

But Rell did nothing to increase revenues. In fact, she borrowed $1 billion in 2009 for operating expenses, which added to the structural deficit Malloy inherited.

By comparison, Malloy put a record-setting $1.5 billion in taxes on the table in February and swore off one-shot revenue and gimmicks, such as borrowing for everyday expenses.

As a result, some fiscal analysts believe the state could be producing sizable surpluses in the near future, barring a double-dip recession.

When Malloy and the State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition announced their first tentative agreement, the focus was on the $1.6 billion the administration estimated it would save over two years.

But Malloy says more important was the actuarial projections it could save $21.5 billion over two decades, numbers based in part over higher retirement ages that would take effect in 2022 and an immediate doubling of the financial penalties for early-retirement.

Weighed against the immediate impact on the proposed budget pending before the General Assembly, the long-term savings got short shrift, he says.

“The $21.5 billion actuarial estimate of what the savings is was at most a footnote in stories,” Malloy says.

Mark Ojakian, the governor’s labor negotiator, said the state approached the concession talks with a two-track strategy of immediate cost savings to help balance the budget and long-term savings to stabilize the state’s finances.

“It was very difficult to balance those two, but we had to do it,” he said.

Ojakian said that union leaders saw the importance of sustainability to protect their member’s benefits over the long haul, but it is clear that many rank and file members have not.

“Absolutely, I am surprised people didn’t see past 2017,” Ojakian said. “And I was also surprised that people didn’t appreciate what is happening in other states, where collective bargaining rates were taken away altogether.”

In this effort to win ratification, it is one of the union talking points. A new leaflet giving reasons for ratification warns of  “lost right to negotiate health care.”

Sprinkled among the 149 comments on a Mirror story reviewed by Malloy recently were indications some employees are taking a longer view.

“Yes,” wrote one employee, “i need my raise but i would rather see a little more stability for at least a few more years.”

 

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Mark Pazniokas

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Connecticut’s $90M lobbying industry has a new player: former Speaker Joe Aresimowicz
by Mark Pazniokas

Former House Speaker Joe Aresimowicz is becoming a lobbyist, but a revolving-door law limits him for a year.

Spiking tax revenue will wipe out state budget deficit, analysts say
by Keith M. Phaneuf

Projected state revenues skyrocketed by $1.7 billion Friday, positioning officials to balance the next state budget without tax hikes.

Judge approves shorter sentence for convicted murderer turned prison mentor
by Kelan Lyons

The DOC could start screening Clyde Meikle in July for discharge to a halfway house.

Without vocal dissent, Senate confirms Justice Andrew McDonald
by Mark Pazniokas

The state Senate acted quickly Friday to confirm Andrew J. McDonald to a second term on the Supreme Court.

Funding to fix CT’s roads and bridges is drying up, and officials don’t have a solution
by Keith M. Phaneuf and Kasturi Pananjady

Connecticut's transportation building program is on a financial diet after a five-year ramp-up after lawmakers rejected tolls.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion Evidence not clear that Trump incited Capitol destruction
by Alan Calandro

Defending President Donald Trump is not popular and I have no interest in writing this other than adherence to truth. Recognizing the truth (if we can find it, which is not always possible of course) should make us be able to come together around that and move on with a common understanding.

Opinion Securing our nuclear legacy: An open letter to President-elect Joe Biden
by Erik Assadourian

Dear President-elect Biden: As you noted in a tweet shortly after protestors stormed the Capitol on Wednesday, “Today is a reminder, a painful one, that democracy is fragile.” Indeed it is. And so are nation-states.

Opinion Last votes of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and others
by Gary A. Franks

Finally, the election season is over. The historic elections we saw in this cycle were intriguing. The runoff elections for the U.S. Senate in Georgia put a cap on the campaign season. For many people this could be described as a COVID-19 election. I would argue that this was an election influenced by a pandemic but determined by the killing of unarmed Black people with no adequate justice for the Black community.

Opinion Not just environmental problem; Killingly plant is a great target
by Joel Gordes

In 1990, I was one of five legislators to introduce the first climate change legislation that became PA 90-219, An Act Considering Climate Change, the most popular bill of that session. Back then I considered climate change a national security issue… and I still do.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO