Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

CL&P rate request has become a lightning rod

  • Money
  • by Keith M. Phaneuf
  • October 30, 2014
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

Connecticut Light & Power Co. has nearly four times as many customers as United Illuminating, the state’s other major electric utility.

Yet when it comes to rate hikes – and the Connecticut politicians who care – the ratio is skewed even more heavily toward CL&P.

One year ago, UI’s request for a 33 percent rate hike sparked a letter of opposition from one state legislator.

Flash forward 12 months – into an election year – and more than 80 state and federal lawmakers have protested a pending CL&P request, which is less than UI’s in percentage terms. In fact, 16 state legislators in UI’s service area, who didn’t comment on their local utility’s request last year, are protesting CL&P’s.

Lawmakers defend their intense interest, arguing it is justified by the utility giant’s recent merger, its performance during past storms, and the high overall cost of electricity in the region.

But CL&P, which last sought a distribution rate hike four years ago, noted that the rate review process doesn’t address political arguments  — a point also raised during proceedings by the head of Connecticut’s regulatory agency.

“As public servants, we cannot overlook the negative impact the company’s (CL&P’s) proposed measures would have on working families and small businesses throughout the state,” reads a letter sent last month to the Public Utility Regulatory Authority by 70 members of the Democratic majority in the state House and Senate.

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy and U.S. Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Christopher Murphy all sent letters of opposition to PURA, and released them in press statements.

“PURA must reject this unconscionable and unacceptable increase in CL&P’s fixed rate charge, and go a step further,” wrote Blumenthal, who is not up for re-election this year. “It must reduce the current charge itself.”

Given the pending rate case, PURA officials could not comment for this article, said Dennis Schain, spokesman for the authority.

But PURA Chairman Arthur House, in opening comments when hearings began on the CL&P rate case on Aug. 27, cautioned all parties about recommending conclusions prematurely.

“I can’t imagine that such elected officials … would call or tell a judge how to determine the outcome of a criminal or civil case before the witnesses have been heard, before the law has been applied,” he said.

NU spokeswoman Caroline Pretyman said Thursday that, “The regulatory process for approving rates has been designed to provide an objective assessment of the costs required to provide safe, reliable power to our customers. We know many of our customers, as well as the elected officials who represent them, may have questions about our filing, but we would hope they adhere to this process, which was designed to remove politics from the decision.”

But several legislators who wrote to PURA said most of their arguments stick to basic and appropriate concerns, such as the high cost of electrical service in Connecticut.

Rep. Lonnie Reed, D-Branford, co-chairwoman of the legislature’s Energy and Technology Committee, said NU must expect more officials to be concerned, given that a recent merger made it the largest utility in New England.

Frankly, Reed also said, “United Illuminating has been working with us better,” both in addressing service concerns and in expanding renewable energy projects and other clean energy initiatives that have become a priority at the state Capitol.

“We feel warmer and fuzzier with UI,” she said, adding the concern about NU is understandable – and not a product of election-year politics. “There’s a corporate thing that happens with NU.”

And even those in UI’s service system – 17 communities in the Greater New Haven and Great Bridgeport areas – said CL&P’s rates affect businesses all across Connecticut.

“Whatever CL&P does has a ripple effect,” said Rep. Juan Candelaria, D-New Haven.

CL&P rates “should be a concern to everyone in the state,” said Rep. Robert Megna, D-New Haven.

Kevin DelGobbo, a former member of PURA, said it’s no secret in Connecticut that state legislative seats are up for election every two years.

“Regulators, really all across the country, are in the very accustomed position of knowing they have to decide controversial cases in the middle of election cycles, and that is just a fact of their life. They are used to it and I think they deal with it.”

Pretyman added that NU appreciates that legislators “may have questions about our filing, and this process allows for that participation.”

But she also noted that state utility regulators already have largely resolved one of the big questions surrounding CL&P’s recent performance record.

PURA ruled earlier this year that, over the next six years, CL&P could cover about $365 million of the costs it incurred restoring power and rebuilding its system after two severe storms in 2011.

That decision boosts rates by about 13 percent. The company’s pending request to raise its distribution rates effectively would boost the overall increase to 26 percent. The average residential customer’s bill would rise by roughly $6.75 per month.

“Nearly half of the costs have already been approved by PURA during a thorough review of our response to the historic storms of 2011,” Pretyman said. “Since that time, our customers have begun experiencing the benefits of our targeted, long-term investments in the electric system, as 2013 was our best reliability performance, with fewer and shorter power interruptions.”

UI last year requested a 33.6 percent rate increase, and was granted 16.5 percent.

CL&P, which serves 1.2 million customers spread across 149 cities and towns, last received a distribution rate increase in 2010. As part of the state-approved merger in April 2012 of its parent company, Northeast Utilities, with Boston-based NStar, NU agreed to freeze its distribution rates until December of this year.

CL&P faced heavy criticism of its response to the 2011 storms. Hundreds of thousands of customers lost power for more than a week after an August tropical storm and an October nor’easter

And while state panels questioned the utility’s preparedness, they also acknowledged CL&P has taken several steps since then to improve storm response. These include enhanced tree-trimming, other system improvements, new training procedures and better communication with municipal and state officials.

One issue tied to those storms, though, still is pending before PURA.

Attorney General George Jepsen has sought “meaningful” penalties over CL&P’s response.

Jepsen is pursuing $28 million in penalties to be applied over three years, and PURA officials have determined that request will be decided at the same time the pending CL&P rate request is resolved.

“We advocate for fairness for Connecticut consumers to ensure that any rates are no more than just and reasonable, as required by law,” Jepsen said.

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Keith M. Phaneuf A winner of numerous journalism awards, Keith Phaneuf has been CT Mirror’s state finances reporter since it launched in 2010. The former State Capitol bureau chief for The Journal Inquirer of Manchester, Keith has spent most of 31 years as a reporter specializing in state government finances, analyzing such topics as income tax equity, waste in government and the complex funding systems behind Connecticut’s transportation and social services networks. A former contributing writer to The New York Times, Keith is a graduate of and a former journalism instructor at the University of Connecticut.

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Plan to expand child tax credit offers hope along with direct payments
by Lisa Backus | C-HIT.ORG

When her car started making a noise more than a year ago, Chinara Johnson parked the vehicle and hasn’t used it since. As a New Haven mother of 5-year-old twin boys, one of whom is on the autism spectrum, and an 8-year-old daughter, Johnson doesn’t have the money to get the car running properly again. […]

Republicans on key committee oppose no-excuse absentee ballot voting
by Mark Pazniokas

Republicans signaled Friday they will try to block fast-track action on a constitutional amendment allowing no-excuse voting by absentee ballot.

Ned Lamont’s year in the shadow of COVID
by Mark Pazniokas

Ned Lamont has been the face, voice, and interpreter of the COVID crisis, mourning deaths, explaining setbacks and cautiously celebrating.

With billions in federal relief on the way to CT, legislators assert their role in deciding how to spend it
by Keith M. Phaneuf and Mark Pazniokas

With an unusual bill, state legislators are reminding Gov. Ned Lamont they have significant role in disbursing federal coronavirus relief.

Rep. Patricia Billie Miller wins vacant Senate seat
by Mark Pazniokas

Rep. Patricia Billie Miller, D-Stamford, won a special election to the state Senate.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion Assisted suicide lobby spreads falsehoods to promote systemic ableism
by Stephen Mendelsohn

Proponents of assisted suicide repeatedly spread falsehoods to promote their lethal and ableist agenda.  The February 8 op-ed, “Aid in dying is not assisted suicide” is no exception. Suicide is defined as the act of taking one’s life intentionally.  The person who intentionally ingests a prescribed lethal overdose more closely fits the dictionary definition of suicide than the despondent person who jumps off a bridge.  The desire for suicide is a cry for help, even when redefined as a “medical treatment option.”

Opinion TCI will create a fourth gasoline tax
by Christian A. Herb

The Transportation Climate Initiative, or TCI, calls for a proposed emissions fee on gasoline to help battle climate change. On the surface, supporters say it is a small price to pay to help save the planet; and if you truly believe that this is the case, then you should consider voting for it. Despite the administration’s efforts to go out of their way to not call TCI a tax, the simple truth is that it will only create additional financial hardships on lower- and middle-income families struggling to make ends meet during the pandemic.

Opinion Let’s keep telehealth when the pandemic ends
by Steven Madonick, MD

Telehealth may lead to positive, even transformational changes in psychiatric care, and Connecticut needs to keep it after the pandemic. Connecticut needs to pass the necessary laws to continue telehealth and telephonic care.

Opinion The public health bill no one is talking about, but should be
by Brian Festa

On February 16,  the legislature's Public Health Committee conducted a public hearing on two bills, S.B. 568 and H.B. 6423, both of which would eliminate the religious exemption to mandatory vaccinations for Connecticut schoolchildren.  The hearing was capped at 24 hours, depriving nearly 1,500 members of the public who had registered for the hearing their opportunity to be heard.  The vast majority of those who did testify, and who submitted written testimony, opposed the bill.  The committee is expected to vote on the bill as early as  today. 

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO