Could a state make casting its electoral votes contingent on the candidates for president and vice president releasing their last three annual tax returns — a convention flouted in 2016 by Donald J. Trump?
The Connecticut legislature’s Government Administration and Elections Committee voted 9-8 along party lines Monday night to approve and send to the floor House Bill 6575 bill, which would test that notion in state law.
“Can I just ask what the point of this bill is?” said Rep. Rob C. Sampson, R-Wolcott. “Do we have any jurisdiction over such a thing?”
“To me, this is a perfectly reasonable thing to have in front of us,” replied Sen. Gayle Slossberg, D-Milford.
She noted the extensive testimony in support of the measure during a public hearing.
Sampson, who called the proposal “divisive” and “blatantly political,” asked if any other state had done such a thing.
Want more in-depth Connecticut reporting?
Get CT Mirror briefings with enterprise reporting, investigations and more in your inbox daily.
Democrats replied that bills were pending elsewhere, but they were unaware that New Jersey actually passed a similar bill earlier this month.
But Gov. Chris Christie, a Republican ally of Trump’s, albeit one who was bounced as the head of the presidential transition team, is widely expected to veto it.
Any state that adopted such a requirement would have no leverage over Trump and his tax returns unless he runs again in 2020.