Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

‘Public charge’ proposal concerns immigration advocates, attorneys

  • Immigration
  • by Clarice Silber and CTMirror Contributor
  • December 10, 2018
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

A Trump administration proposal that would change the way the government determines whether someone is likely to be a “public charge” could be deterring immigrants with legal status and parents of citizen children across Connecticut from accessing a range of public benefits like food stamps or Medicaid.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposal would expand the definition of “public charge,” which examines how likely it is that certain immigrants will become dependent on government subsistence. Immigrants considered under this policy include those applying for admission to the country or those applying for green cards.

The rule would give immigration case workers the ability to more widely deny legal U.S. residency if applicants are deemed likely to use those public benefits.

The 60-day period for public comment on the proposal closes today (Monday); DHS is required to consider public comments before it finalizes the regulation. Nearly 190,000 comments on the proposed rule had been received, either by mail or submitted online at Regulations.gov, by Monday afternoon.

State advocates and immigration attorneys say the proposal is already spreading confusion and fear among local immigrants.

“It was deliberately proposed in order to make people afraid and to deter people from applying (for benefits) because of that fear,” said Greater Hartford Legal Aid attorney Lucy Potter. “There is going to be cost savings because people will be confused about the rule and won’t apply for benefits.”

Jackie Vimo, a policy analyst with the National Immigration Law Center, said the proposal is already having a chilling effect on communities and deterring people from accessing benefits they are legally entitled to obtain.

Jackie Vimo, policy analyst with the National Immigration Law Center

“We’re hearing stories from across the country of people disenrolling from benefits, mothers returning breast pumps to Women, Infants and Children (WIC), people ceasing their cancer treatment because they were on Medicaid,” Vimo said, adding that the proposal will penalize families who are struggling financially and accessing benefits like a nutrition program.

Federal law already requires immigrants seeking to change their status to prove they will not be a public charge, but the new proposal would broaden the list of benefits considered to include Supplemental Nutrition Assistance (SNAP), Medicaid, the Medicare Part D Low Income Subsidy, and several housing assistance programs.

An estimated 432,000 people in Connecticut — a number which includes all age groups, both citizens and non-citizens — live in a family with a non-citizen, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Roughly 186,000 of those people live in a family that both includes a non-citizen and someone who receives SNAP, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), housing assistance, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), or State Administered General Assistance.

In 2016, 45,000 citizen children with non-citizen parents in Connecticut used Medicaid or CHIP coverage, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

In an emailed statement to the CT Mirror, the state Department of Social Services (DSS) said it is reviewing the public charge proposal and preparing information about its potential impact.

DSS said it shares concerns that the proposed rule could have a negative impact on access to critical services for U.S. citizens living in immigrant families and immigrants residing in the U.S. legally who are on a path to citizenship.

“To date, since the proposed rule was released two months ago, we have not seen changes in application and enrollment trends in our services,” DSS said. “With that said, this proposed rule change is bad policy.”

In October, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Director L. Francis Cissna told attendees of a Migration Policy Institute immigration conference the proposal would, for the first time, definitively state what public charge means and create a standard for proper enforcement.

Certain “humanitarian” immigrants — refugees, those applying for or granted asylum, and people applying for green cards under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) — are not subject to the public charge rule.

Potter said very few people have already accessed public benefits when applying for green cards because of the 1996 welfare reform law, which bars legal immigrants from using those programs for five years.

Steve Camarota, director of research for the Center for Immigration Studies.

Steve Camarota, the director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies, said non-humanitarian immigration is supposed to be a benefit to the country. The new federal proposal should help reduce future immigrant welfare use and select a slightly more skilled flow of immigrants, he said.

“If you focus on chilling effect you miss the larger problem—why do we allow so many people in if they don’t have the ability to support their children without these benefits?” Camarota said.

Erin O’Neil-Baker, a Hartford immigration attorney, said many of her clients in the final stages of applying for permanent residency are concerned about the proposal. She said some clients are weighing whether they should continue receiving benefits for their citizen children.

“It’s a huge concern. When they think about if they receive HUSKY for their children who are U.S. citizens, will that impact them or keep them from getting permanent residency?” O’Neil-Baker said.

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Clarice Silber

CTMirror Contributor

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Backlogs and delays in naturalizations will keep many CT immigrants from voting this year
by Kasturi Pananjady and Ana Radelat

As of March 31, more than 7,600 Connecticut immigrants were stuck in a backlog of pending cases.

Trump administration defunds CT police in ‘sanctuary’ policy likely to come under Supreme Court review
by Ana Radelat

The Supreme Court is likely to decide whether the Justice Department can continue to withhold policing grants from Connecticut.

CT immigrants hail Supreme Court DACA decision, but say stronger protections are needed
by Ana Radelat

Immigrant advocates say congressional action is needed to permanently protect immigrant youth from deportation.

Connecticut provides coronavirus assistance for undocumented
by Mark Pazniokas

The program is modest, with $2.5 million in state funds and $1 million in philanthropy. Advocates say more is needed.

CT doctors seek coronavirus health coverage for the undocumented
by Ana Radelat

Saying undocumented families pose an obstacle to keeping the coronavirus from spreading, 185 Connecticut doctors want HUSKY coverage for them.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion Lamont’s new vaccination priorities are simple and smart
by Richard Davies

Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont’s new age-eligibility vaccine plan is simple, smart and straightforward. The more complicated the rules are, the greater the chance of screw-ups and of well-connected people getting their shots before they should. The governor is doing a good job.

Opinion Gas pipeline will threaten water quality, wildlife and wetlands
by Susan Eastwood

The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection has granted tentative approval of the 401 water quality certification for the Pomfret to Killingly natural gas pipeline. I urge DEEP to deny the 401 certification, as the proposed pipeline would violate the Connecticut’s water quality standards, and the conditions in the draft certification fail to protect our streams, wetlands, and wildlife.

Opinion Connecticut and the other Connecticut. Which will endure?
by Ezra Kaprov

What comes to mind when you hear the word ‘Connecticut’? Possibly, you think of a 43-year-old Puerto Rican man who arrived here with his family following Hurricane Maria. He works full-time as a machinist at the Sikorsky plant, and he coaches a prizefighter on the side.

Opinion COVID-19 increases urgency for legislature to pass medical aid-in-dying law
by Dr. Gary Blick

The COVID-19 crisis has exposed the profound tragedy of loved ones dying alone, in a hospital or nursing home, without the care and comfort of loved ones surrounding them. This pandemic also demonstrates the fragility of life, the limits of modern medicine to relieve suffering, and has magnified the systemic racial disparities in our healthcare system, resulting in higher hospitalization and death rates for people in communities of color. We must eradicate these disparities, so everyone has equal access to the full range of end-of-life care options.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO