Washington – As the tax filing season ramps up, Alan Clavette, a certified public accountant in Newtown, joked that he is considering putting a sign on the door that says “don’t kill the messenger.”
That’s because the enormous new changes in the federal tax code will affect almost everyone filing their 2018 taxes. Clavette and other accountants in the state are concerned their clients won’t be fully prepared for the changes, especially those suddenly faced with higher federal tax bills this year.
“The tax world has been turned upside down,” said the owner of Clavette & Company. “I expect to have some difficult conversations with our clients.”
Connecticut is one of several states, including New York, New Jersey, Maryland and California, that will be most affected by the new cap on the deductibility of state and property taxes residents pay.
The new federal tax law, called the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” capped those deductions at $10,000. According to the Connecticut Department of Revenue Services, about 484,000 Connecticut tax filers took deductions for state and local taxes (or SALT) that exceeded the $10,000 cap in 2015, the last year for which this data is available.
The federal tax overhaul, promoted and supported exclusively by Republicans in Congress, will also help thousands of Connecticut taxpayers, especially young people and the elderly with modest incomes.
First the losers.
While cautioning that every tax filer’s situation is different, Clavette said two-earner families in the state with incomes between $150,000 and $250,000 are the most likely to be hurt by the new tax law.
That’s because those two-income families are more likely to pay high state income taxes and high property taxes that were fully deductible before, but now exceed the SALT cap.
Families in that income range may also have several children. In 2017, parents were able to deduct $4,050 for each child from their taxable income on their federal returns. Now the deduction is only $500 and only children younger than 17 are eligible.
Bonnie Stewart, executive director of the Connecticut Society of CPAs said the new tax law’s impact will be felt “on a case-by-case basis.”
“But there are definitely a number of people in our state who will be paying more,” she said.
Connecticut has estimated that the SALT cap will cause taxpayers to pay an additional $2.8 billion in taxes for the 2018 tax year.
But Stewart said there are other changes in the federal tax code that may offset the cap on SALT deductions for many Connecticut filers.
The winners
The GOP tax law will also make many Connecticut residents happy this year. Those who don’t itemize will benefit from a doubling of the standard deduction of $12,000 for single filers and $24,000 for married couples.
People in this group of taxpayers tend to be younger, renters instead of homeowners, and retirees who have paid off their homes and no longer have a mortgage interest deduction or itemize their deductions.
Many of the state’s wealthiest residents will also benefit. Some high-income filers who paid the alternative minimum tax will now be exempt. More importantly, these wealthier tax filers will benefit from the new federal tax brackets. The top tax bracket has dropped from 39.6 percent to 32 percent.
The problem, at least politically, for the GOP is that it sold the new tax law as a benefit to all Americans.
In three of the states most affected — New York, California and New Jersey — Republicans lost 14 U.S. House seats in the 2018 midterms. Those seats accounted for about a third of the party’s overall losses.
Eliminating the cap would also pose problems as it’s a key revenue raiser in the $1.5 trillion tax-code overhaul, paying for the slashing of rates for businesses and individuals.
The GOP argues the restriction on SALT deductions is a matter of tax fairness. Why should wealthier, “blue states” get a tax break that “red states” don’t enjoy, they asked.
Since property taxes and income taxes tend to be lower in red states, where wages and the cost of living is also lower, taxpayers in red states are much less likely to hit the cap.
The SALT cap “makes all states the same,” President Donald Trump said.
Democrats, meanwhile, say the cap was imposed to punish states that vote Democratic.
“This was firmly targeted to a handful of blue states,” said Connecticut Commissioner of Revenue Services Scott Jackson.
Last year, Connecticut approved a workaround for the SALT cap, allowing cities and towns to set up non-profit and charitable organizations that would accept donations from taxpayers that could be deducted from a property tax bills. Taxpayers are still allowed to take an unlimited amount of charitable deductions.
Thee Internal Revenue Service, however, promptly issued a rule aimed at Connecticut, New York and other states implementing workarounds, saying tax payments can’t be converted into charitable contributions.
Jackson said not one of Connecticut’s 169 cities and towns has taken advantage of the state’s workaround.
Congress considering cap repeal
With the Democratic takeover of the House, however, calls for eliminating the SALT cap have grown in Congress.
Reps. Tom Suozzi, D-N.Y., and Peter King, R-N.Y., have introduced the “SALT Fairness Act,” which would re-establish the full deductibility of state and local taxes on a federal return.
“Are we going to get everything we want, I don’t know,” said Suozzi recently on WSHU. “We are going to have to fight our way through to get it done.”
While Trump told regional newspaper reporters this week that he’s “open to talking about” revisions to the SALT cap, the GOP-led Senate is unlikely to start unraveling their tax bill, which Republicans consider a major GOP accomplishment, and would likely force raising the tax rate on corporations.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, indicated this week he would not consider any changes to the cap.
The battle has also been enjoined in the courts, with Connecticut, New York ,New Jersey and other blue states suing the Trump administration over the cap.
The lawsuit is based on the U.S. Constitution’s equal protection clause and principles of federalism that date back to the nation’s founding.
Citing the nation’s first income tax, a provisional levy enacted in 1862 to help finance the Union effort during the Civil War, the lawsuit argues that all state and local taxes first were deducted from the new federal tax obligation.
Meanwhile, real estate agents in blue states are concerned that the limitation on property tax deductions may drive home buyers to less expensive homes, resulting in an overall lowering of real estate values.
“I’m not seeing a substantial impact,” said Dan Keune, president of the Connecticut Association of Realtors, about the effect of the SALT cap in the state. “It may take a while after tax time for people to understand.”
So, as a senior of modest income, I really like the new tax laws. I have attended many meetings with our state representatives and most of the democrat representative have recommended higher taxes on the rich. Would anybody care to state what people consider rich? Having greater than 10,000 dollars of property taxes, means in most towns you are living in a 500,000 dollar house or higher. When the property tax limitations were instituted by the state we heard no outrage by the party in control of the state congress. When the seniors private pension was taxed at the highest rate, the controlling state party not only voted for it they failed to ensure the seniors were notified except by call ins to numerous talk radio commentators. I could go on and on about the increase in taxes, fees and tolls that there are no outrage by the same people decrying President Trumps attempt to help people save money.
Blue State politicians now have to answer for strapping their residents with such high taxes. What’s ironic, though, is that the mantra of Progressives (of both parties) and their supporters is ‘make the rich pay more.’ Well, they’ve now gotten that and they’re complaining about it. They’re also looking to make the ‘middle class’ pay more. The more they determine they ‘need,’ the lower down the income scale they will milk.
Our property taxes in Hamden are $12,000/year for a home valued at $360,000. The tax law maybe an assault on blue states in the eyes of some politicians like former Hamden Mayor Jackson. The fiscal mismanagement of this state and some towns like Hamden is an assault on us all.
I notice Hamden per pupil costs for education just passed 20k for k-12(remember k-8 has no sports/labs etc so should be far less than 9-12). You are now at level of New Canaan, Roxbury etc. Are you getting what you pay for as that is the largest cost in Hamden. Many cities will be at 20k soon, more than tuition at many private high schools
The primary advantage of the SALT cap is that it clearly spotlights the burden these (formerly deductible) taxes put on CT residents.
Rather than complain about how the Feds put CT in a bind, just maybe our CT politicians need to recognize what they’ve done to us.
As someone who (because of defective foundations) sees 100s of homes and hears about the property tax burden put on the owners, CT has to wake up and focus on reducing the cost of government rather than dream up new ways to get into our wallets.
This is clearly a case of state tax mismanagement. If we were better run and controlled then our property taxes would not be through the roof. Decades of Democratic spending without thinking about the consequences has us lumped into states like NY, CA and NJ. That is shameful to this once proud state.
And don’t mention ‘higher taxes mean better school systems’ when CT spends $20k (vs $12,500 national average) on each student yet results in below average mathematics scores and slightly above average reading results when compared to the rest of the nation.
CT leaders will boast of “higher tax revenues” demonstrating CT is on the road to “recovery”. But many CT taxpayers will pay higher CT taxes because of the new Federal $10k state/local tax limit. Isn’t that wonderful. Taxpayers in the nation’s most mismanaged State with a long stagnant economy and billion dollar State budget deficits get to pay even higher taxes. Gosh !
A savvy new Governor would arrange reductions in CT State tax to offset the negative impacts of the new additional Federal taxes owed by CT residents. But that’s a pipe dream. So CT taxpayers get a double whammy – new CT taxes on the way and another tax hike from Uncle Sam.
No doubt about it. CT is “coming back” !
What the article fails to mention is that it is precisely the states whose residents are most punished (and it is intentional punishment) by the new tax law are also the ones who benefit the LEAST from federal transfers. Overwhelmingly, the largest per capita federal transfers are to the “red” states where virtually everyone benefits from the new rates (because their household income is much lower, they rarely itemized, and few residents have SALT over the limit–the mortgage deduction stays in place though, which, along with lowered top rate, benefits the wealthiest in those red states). So how about we limit federal transfers to states in proportion to the taxes they pay into the federal Treasury?
Of course we won’t do that–and shouldn’t. Because part of what has long made America great is that it is a fiscal union, not just a monetary union (e.g. the EU). That means the better off in the country help those less well off. That is called a community. But the GOP tax bill looks to tear at the heart of the American community–and that is the real bottom line.
What color is the sky in your world? Clearly this exposes the fact that our state has taken advantage of a loophole for years to cater to the special interest groups for votes. Now as they say, “The Emperor has no clothes” And the mismanagement is exposed for all to see.