Bridgeport — It’s war. Alex Jones said so from his Infowars studio in Austin as his Connecticut attorney, Norm Pattis, sat beside him, mouth agape at times. They are coming for him, U.S. Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy leading the charge, trying to get him off the air. A Barack Obama appointee is their “errand boy,” using the Sandy Hook victims.
That was the story Jones told in a profanity-laced tirade broadcast Friday on radio stations and over the web, when he accused Chris Mattei, one of lawyers suing him for defamation on behalf of Sandy Hook families, of trying to frame him with child pornography. That was the story Pattis tried to defend Tuesday in a courtroom here, with limited success.
Superior Court Judge Barbara Bellis called it “indefensible” and “possibly criminal.” But she declined to punish Jones by declaring him in default, which would have stripped him of the right to a trial. Instead, she barred him from pursuing a motion to dismiss the case and ordered him to pay any attorneys’ fees associated with the imbroglio.
The case is tentatively scheduled for trial in November 2020.
And so went the latest chapter of a lawsuit that is a mashup of politics, law, conspiracy theories, and pop culture, all connected to a tragedy that still rubs raw in Connecticut — the mass shootings of 20 first-grade students and six educators at Sandy Hook School in Newtown in December 2012.
Jones, who has yet to step in a Connecticut courtroom, no longer questions that Sandy Hook was real. He no longer professes that Sandy Hook was an element of a vast left-wing conspiracy.
But, in his view, the lawsuit is.
As he said on his show, Jones blames “the Democratic party operatives that handle and manage all of those poor families and use their grief to inflict wounds on Connecticut every day.”
The suit was filed by Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder of Bridgeport, the same firm representing Sandy Hook families in a lawsuit against the manufacturer of the AR-15 used to kill their relatives. The suit accuses Jones of knowingly and recklessly promoting what he knew to be false: that Sandy Hook was staged.
“I live not far from Sandy Hook,” Pattis said on Jones’ show Saturday, when Pattis prodded him to walk back his accusation. “So from my perspective, there’s never been any doubt that it happened. A friend of mine lost his stepdaughter. And the suggestion that it didn’t happen to me is outrageous. But I don’t believe it’s outrageous to defend a person’s right to say that.”
The issue Tuesday was Jones’ tirade on Friday in which he accused Koskoff of framing him with child pornography, theatrically punched a photo of Mattei and offered a reward of $1 million for information leading to the conviction of whomever planted child porn in his emails. He was by turns irate and instantly calm, prompting the judge to accuse him of acting.
“You’re trying to set me up with child porn,” Jones said on Friday, staring into the camera. “I’m going to get your ass. One million dollars. One million dollars, you little gang members. One million dollars to put your head on a pike. One million dollars, bitch. I’m going to get your ass. You understand me now?”
Pattis told Bellis that the comment was not a threat directed at Mattei, but anger at his suspicion he was being framed — a suspicion that Pattis said he does not share. Pattis said he suspects the porn was sent by unknown parties to Jones to harass him.
On Saturday, Jones recanted, at least in part: “Now, I’m not saying that the lawyers for the Sandy Hook families set this up or did this.”
The child porn was discovered by a data consultant hired to review, analyze and catalog the 58,000 emails Infowars gave Koskoff as part of the discovery process. The material was given to the FBI, who discovered a total of 12 suspect images.
No one accused Jones of engaging in child pornography. The material was in attachments sent to Jones, some or all hidden in malware. Koskoff’s consultant and the FBI said it did not appear that any of the images were opened by anyone at Infowars. Koskoff had notified the FBI because possessing child pornography is a crime.
Jones went public, saying he suspected a frame.
Pattis all but shrugged Tuesday, reminding the judge, “Mr. Jones is a conspiracy theorist. He thinks there are people out to get him. And guess what, there are.”
But Pattis made clear he doesn’t believe Koskoff did anything wrong, not does he think his client meant to harass or threaten Mattei.
“How would you characterize it?” Bellis asked.
“As an ugly outburst. As an angry outburst,” Pattis replied.
Pattis urged the judge not to take the radical step of declaring Jones in default, which essentially would be an order finding him liable damages for defamation.
“Don’t be played for a fool here,” he said.
If Mattei believes he was threatened, he should seek criminal charges; if he thinks he was defamed, he can pursue that claim in civil court, Pattis said. But the lawyer also questioned if Mattei was a public figure, who would have to prove actual malice in a defamation case. Mattei was a Democratic candidate for attorney general last year, losing a primary.
Pattis stood directly behind Mattei as he spoke. The courtroom was tiny. The plaintiffs’ lawyers sat a table in front, the defense directly behind them. Mattei sat with his hands folded, staring at the table as Pattis spoke. Jones had wrongly referred to Mattei as an Obama-appointed U.S. attorney. Mattei was a staff lawyer in the U.S. attorney’s office, not a presidential appointee. And he started there in 2007, when George W. Bush was president.
One of his co-counsels is Matt Blumenthal, a Democratic state representative and the son of Richard Blumenthal, the U.S. senator whom Jones describes as somehow directing a litigation conspiracy against him.
William Bloss, representing the Koskoff firm, told Bellis that Jones’ behavior was outrageous: He made the existence of the child porn public, not Koskoff; and he invited his listeners to conclude that Chris Mattei was behind it.
“He created this controversy,” Bloss said. “This was planned, your honor.”
Bloss said Jones may have stepped back from the accusation, but he offered not one grain of contrition. He reminded Bellis that Jones had once promoted a conspiracy theory that Democratic pedophiles were imprisoning children at a pizza shop in Washington D.C. called Comet Ping Pong.
A man with an AR-15 fired shots in the store, saying he was there to rescue the children. Jones later apologized to the owner, James Alefantis:
“I want our viewers and listeners to know that we regret any negative impact our commentaries may have had on Mr. Alefantis, Comet Ping Pong, or its employees. We apologize to the extent our commentaries could be construed as negative statements about Mr. Alefantis or Comet Ping Pong, and we hope that anyone else involved in commenting on Pizzagate will do the same thing.”
On Tuesday, Bloss said, a uniformed police officer was stationed at the law firm’s office.
One day, maybe the press in Connecticut will cover the overseas exploits of Senators Murphy and Blumenthal. I can dream. These hypocrites blame docs and pharmacies for the real story – the illicit drug activities created by sanctuary and open streets for killer Chinese imports and Puerto Rican Cartel goods . Maybe, one day, the press will hold Dems accountable for the failure of the Connecticut housing market to rebound. Nope, we get a skewering of Alex Jones who has a right to his opinion and who really cares? One would think this an opportunity for an unbiased media person to cover the censoring of all Connecticut Conservative groups by social media giant Facebook. Dost the Senators not believe in the 1st Amendment? Hmmmm. Crickets.
I agree with you that too often Democrats’ feet aren’t held to the fire to anywhere near the extent that Republicans’ are. And I have far too often found that those of the liberal persuasion believe fervently in the 1st Amendment — as long as you agree with them. But if I were interested in the views of any group — conservative, liberal or whatever — I would not go to Facebook. Far too much false information and just plain garbage there. I do not have, nor do I have any desire for, a Facebook account. I would seek out a group’s website or some other source that could be verified. And as for Alex Jones… yes, he has an absolute right to his opinion, despicable as it is. And he has an absolute right to the consequences of that opinion if it causes harm to others, which his hoax/conspiracy theory rants did.
I’m with Judge Bellis. Not knowing anything about Alex Jones and not ever having listened to one of his broadcasts, I had to see for myself. So I watched Alex Jones’ detestable “rant”, and I listened closely. I do not believe for a moment that Alex Jones was so outraged by events that he was carried away by his emotions. I believe that he knew exactly what he was saying, that he said what he said deliberately, that he was going for maximum effect, and that he was trying to stir up his listeners. And I don’t believe his “apology” for a moment. Jones is a loose cannon, and Norm Pattis has his work cut out for him trying to keep his client from shooting his mouth off and making Norm’s defense of him even more difficult than it is. Personally, I don’t know how anybody can listen to Jones’ broadcasts, unless his listeners just enjoy being outraged and angry. And I don’t know how Norm Pattis could stomach sitting next to Jones during that disgusting tirade.
Jones is a crank and a fool, and I agree with you, he deliberately trafficked in falsehoods regarding the Sandy Hook massacre. Norm Pattis is a solid criminal defense attorney. He knows that part of the profession is defending unpopular and controversial clients like Alex Jones. But I am sure Attorney Pattis would like his client to just shut up.
On a side note, I have had professional experience with Judge Bellis. She’s a good judge: no-nonsense, fair and practical.
I can’t disagree with the comments below. Jones is a first class fool who gets what he deserves.
Waiting for the national discussion on our first amendment rights, who is a pundit and who is a publisher, and which companies censor conservatives and if these companies, news services and platforms need some oversight or reorganization…that would be a real discussion of this topic…this article is just ridiculously bias but yet, it gets published.