Farmington —J.R. Romano was elected Tuesday to a third two-year term as state chairman of the Connecticut Republican Party, surviving a challenge over the degree to which he bears responsibility for a disastrous 2018 election cycle.
The 74-member State Central Committee overwhelmingly voted for Romano, who captured the post four years ago after a similar debate over how to re-energize, reorganize and re-brand a party that holds no statewide or federal offices and is barely clinging to a 20-percent share of registered voters.
“The sentiment was very clear tonight: We’re going to focus on going after the Democrats,” Romano said.
Susan Hatfield of Pomfret, the party’s nominee for attorney general in 2018 and an early supporter of Donald J. Trump in 2016, was elected vice chair without opposition, succeeding John Slater and returning a woman to the GOP leadership.
“I think Sue did a tremendous job as as a statewide candidate,” Romano said. “I think the entire party recognizes that she needed to have a seat at the table in terms of leadership. Her voice and her work ethic is a force.”
Hatfield is a state prosecutor from eastern Connecticut, a part of the state that has been trending Republican, even as some traditional GOP suburbs in Fairfield County have gone Democratic since the election of Trump. The president’s re-election campaign had two representatives at the meeting, a reminder that the 2020 presidential campaign was well under way.
Hatfield said joining the party leadership was a natural step after being a candidate.
“I think it stems from running for statewide office, and realizing what we need to do as a party to really move forward and win seats,” Hatfield said. “We really need to go into the cities. Many times I was the only Republican statewide candidate going to functions in Bridgeport and New Haven.”
Romano, 40, of Branford was opposed by Richard Foley of Danbury, a former state chairman, and Matt O’Brien of Coventry. Dave Mathus of Darien notified committee members Tuesday morning he was ending his campaign, ceding the race to Romano. All but four of the committee members present voted for Romano.
“I know it hasn’t been easy. I know we don’t always agree,” Romano said, thanking the committee.
He turned to O’Brien, the town chair of Coventry, and asked him to remain active the state party. The two men embraced, before O’Brien left after learning that his wife was in labor with their first child. O’Brien received all four of the dissenting votes.
Romano acknowledged that getting the GOP pulling in the same direction can be a challenge.
“Our greatest strength is our greatest weakness — we are individuals at our core. so we often compete and fight over ideas and direction,” Romano told reporters. “It’s what makes us great leaders, and it also can cause problems when we’re talking about organization.”
It was an anticlimactic end to a long and, at times, acrimonious campaign, one that returned to familiar questions about the role of the state party and state chair in an era of decentralized politics, when each legislative caucus has its own political operation and Super PACs outspend the state parties and their statewide candidates.
The election was only the fifth contested race for GOP chairman since the 1980s. From 1995 until 2011, when Republicans John G. Rowland and M. Jodi Rell were governor, the committee typically deferred to their choices for chair.
Rell did not seek re-election in 2010, when Democrat Dannel P. Malloy won, ending 16 years of Republican control of the governor’s office. Ned Lamont, the Democrat who succeeded Malloy, designated former Lt. Gov. Nancy Wyman as his choice for Democratic chair in December, a decision quickly accepted by the Democratic State Central Committee.
With 463,168 registered voters, Republicans now comprise 21 percent of the Connecticut electorate, compared to 792,555 Democrats and 877,392 unaffiliated voters.
My advice to Mr Romano. Please take the time to read and understand the lessons and learnings given in the book, “The Art of War” by Sun Tzu. The basic premise being, wars are won or lost, before the actual conflict even takes place. It is about knowing your weaknesses and strengths and having a well thought out “battle plan”. And finally, investing an immense amount of time and effort in understanding the traits, tactics, and strengths and weaknesses of your enemy. Mr Romano, the time to start the war is now…if you really want to win.
Romano and Hatfield actively support DJT. His re-election as GOP chair and Hatfield’s election as vice chair officially solidifies the CT GOP as the party of DJT. Why would we vote for ANY CT Republican who intentionally violates their Oaths of office and supports corruption, criminality and the destruction of our democracy, Constitution and rule of law actively, or follows along in silent complicity in loyalty to the label? This is traitorous; patriots would call it out.
They say that what happens in DC is no concern of theirs and doesn’t matter here. They stand with DJT and his deceitful, dishonest, immoral, unethical, corrupt, criminal, and cruel bullying and abuse of power tactics. Some blatantly imitate him believing domination is “leadership” and so they “look good.” “Might makes right” is the maturity of five-year-olds.
This lacks ANY semblance of leadership. It demonstrates immaturity, insecurity and soullessness. It brings self-inflicted karmic blowback. If you vote for them, you join them. Birds of a feather flock together.
Standing for truth and decency require self-respect and human integrity. What about you?
So, many hours after this story is posted, there are no comments. Perhaps that’s a good indication of where the CT GOP is headed. At least they now have a woman in the leadership. Let’s see if that makes a difference.
Beginning to look like the CT GOP “strategy” is to just sit back and wait until CT voters demand an “alternative” to CT Dem governance. The problem here is that the CT GOP hasn’t told us in any detail how it would govern CT. Maybe they’re “confused”.
Remains puzzling why CT’s GOP did not offer a detailed CT Budget alternative. Just criticizing the CT Democrat State Budget doesn’t advance the “public interest”. Especially when the CT GOP has also been advocating “tax and spend” policies for decades when it had power.
Over the years there have been various suggestions to prominent GOP Legislators to convene a focused “Policy Group” that would offer thoughtful policy alternatives to ones promulgated by Democrats over the last decade. And even suggestions for raising some funds to secure occasional services of recognized policy specialists. So far none of these suggestions has caught fire. That puts the GOP in the position of objecting to current policies but unable to offer detailed alternatives. Not a winning strategy for the GOP or CT.