House Speaker Joe Aresimowicz, D-Berlin Keith M. Phaneuf /
House Speaker Joe Aresimowicz, D-Berlin Keith M. Phaneuf / file photo

Gov. Ned Lamont’s fellow Democrats in the legislature may try to override at least one of the three vetoes he issued last week.

House Speaker Joe Aresimowicz, D-Berlin, said members of his chamber haven’t caucused yet, but there’s a good chance they will want to resurrect a bill on workforce training needs.

“I anticipate us taking action,” Aresimowicz said Tuesday, calling the measure “a house priority and an important economic development bill.”

Legislators will return to the Capitol on July 22 for a veto session.

The measure overhauls Connecticut’s Workforce Training Authority, expanding the types of entities that can receive job development grants. The measure particularly looks to expand employment in the construction, health care and early childhood education fields.

But another section of the bill includes a controversial provision involving those who work for tips in Connecticut — and this is the portion that sparked Lamont’s veto.

Current law allows employers to pay a lesser minimum wage to employees who work for tips.

And if an employee has blended duties, spending some time working for tips and other time performing duties that don’t involve gratuities, employers are required to segregate the hours and pay different rates in accordance with the different job tasks.

If an employer doesn’t keep track of how much time is spent working for gratuities versus tip-free work, they must pay the standard minimum wage for all work.

But the bill Lamont vetoed would have required the state Department of Labor to craft new regulations in this area patterned after federal labor rules. These rules allow employers to pay employees with blended job responsibilities the lower minimum wage for all work.

“While it may be reasonable to conclude that state and federal laws should be consistent in this area, that conclusion ought to be made only after sufficient study, debate and input from affected stakeholders,” Lamont wrote in his veto message. “That did not happen here.”

The governor also objected to another provision in the bill which would have made these regulation changes retroactive to any pending labor complaints or other civil actions, something Lamont called  “patently unfair” and raising “serious due process and other constitutional concerns.”

The legislature voted earlier this year to enact a bill to raise the state’s standard minimum wage from $10.10 per hour to $15 per hour by June 1, 2023.

It would require two-thirds of the 151-member House, or 101 representatives, to override a veto. It would also require 24 of the 36 senators to agree.

Senate President Pro Tem Martin M. Looney, D-New Haven, said Tuesday that majority Democrats in that chamber haven’t decided yet whether they wish to pursue a veto override.

Lamont also vetoed two other bills last week.

One would have changed a statute regarding the theft of waste vegetable oil used in restaurants. The oil sometimes is stolen because it can be sold to recycling firms. Lamont argued the penalty imposed in the new bill — up to one year in prison — was too high.

The other bill that was vetoed would have removed a requirement that real estate agents disclose whom they represent to potential buyers before negotiations begin.

Keith has spent most of his 31 years as a reporter specializing in state government finances, analyzing such topics as income tax equity, waste in government and the complex funding systems behind Connecticut’s transportation and social services networks. He has been the state finances reporter at CT Mirror since it launched in 2010. Prior to joining CT Mirror Keith was State Capitol bureau chief for The Journal Inquirer of Manchester, a reporter for the Day of New London, and a former contributing writer to The New York Times. Keith is a graduate of and a former journalism instructor at the University of Connecticut.

Leave a comment