Renée Coleman-Mitchell, commissioner of public health, with Gov. Ned Lamont in September 2019. mark pazniokas /

Renée Coleman-Mitchell, the commissioner of public health, unequivocally urged legislators Monday to repeal Connecticut’s religious exemption from required vaccinations for children entering school, a move some legislative leaders called overdue but welcome as they press ahead with an effort to erase the provision.

Coleman-Mitchell previously said it wasn’t her job to weigh in on pending legislation, but she reversed herself and pledged to testify in support of the measure when it’s introduced during the session that begins in February.

The commissioner and Gov. Ned Lamont recommended the exemption be eliminated effective Oct. 21, 2021 to give parents time to prepare for the change. Vaccinations are required for all students entering public and private schools, but home-schoolers are not covered.

The proposal, which was first reported last week by CT Mirror, was formally announced at a press conference in the governor’s office with legislative leaders, physicians and religious leaders. No major religion prohibits or advises against immunizations, but an increasing number of parents opposed to vaccinations are using it.

The proposed legislation would not force children to be immunized, but it would bar unvaccinated children from enrolling in Connecticut’s public and private schools. Coleman-Mitchell and other state officials cited concern for children with compromised immune systems who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons.

“Children going to school are entitled to learn in a healthy environment safe from disease,” Coleman-Mitchell said. “I make this recommendation at a time when we are seeing Connecticut’s trends of immunization rates decreasing and religious exemption rates increasing. We should not wait until we have a serious outbreak of measles or other infectious diseases or even the possibility of death.”

Her remarks come a week after some lawmakers complained about a lack of responsiveness from her office. Democratic leaders sent a letter to Coleman-Mitchell in June seeking her opinion on whether to repeal the religious exemption. They also publicly called for her input several times, but months passed without an answer.

In August, Coleman-Mitchell told reporters: “I am not able, nor should I weigh in on anything that’s public legislation that comes about as a result of any of the work we do. That’s not in the purview of my role.”

A spokesman for the commissioner said the same thing at a vaccine awareness event earlier last month.

On Monday, Coleman-Mitchell downplayed her reversal and said her office simply needed time to research the issue.

Rabbi Debra Cantor of B’nai Tikvoh-Sholom synagogue in Bloomfield supported the repeal.
Rabbi Debra Cantor of B’nai Tikvoh-Sholom synagogue in Bloomfield supported the repeal.

“I take this role and responsibility very seriously,” she said. “Legislators months ago asked me questions regarding immunizations. They also asked me if we should repeal the religious exemption.”

“The answers to these questions deserve thoughtful consideration from all sides,” Coleman-Mitchell said. “I truly appreciate our legislative leaders for their patience while my team and I have deliberated.”

Lawmakers promised to introduce a bill this winter that will be subject to a public hearing and make its way through the normal legislative process. An attempt to repeal the exemption outside the regular committee process was shelved.

If successful, Connecticut would join several other states that recently have voted to remove non-medical exemptions. New York, Maine and Washington this year all abolished religious or philosophical exemptions.

“The opponents of vaccination say their rights as parents are being infringed upon,” said Senate President Pro Tem Martin Looney, D-New Haven. “That’s certainly not true because children are not chattel. They’re not possessions of their parents.

“The parents have an obligation to care for their children. That’s why we have circumstances where the government steps in to protect children who are not being properly protected.”

Two clergy members said there were no prohibitions in their faiths on vaccinations. To the contrary, a rabbi from Bloomfield and an imam from Avon talked about the duty of shielding those who are vulnerable.

“I speak on behalf of the overwhelming majority of my community,” said Rabbi Debra Cantor of B’nai Tikvoh-Sholom. “Jewish law is clear. Those who are healthy must get vaccinated. … You may not separate yourself from the larger community. You may not endanger those who are vulnerable.”

Proponents of the religious exemption gathered outside the governor’s office to protest the announcement.
Proponents of the religious exemption gathered outside the governor’s office to protest the announcement.

“When it comes to children,” added Imam Safwan Shaiah of the Farmington Valley American Muslim Center, “when it comes to parents who look out for their loved ones, there is no exemption from the sanctity of life. All of us are here to protect each other and especially each other’s children.”

The next step in the run-up to raising legislation is the disclosure of updated school-by-school vaccination data.

The governor last month overruled the health commissioner after she told reporters she would not release school-by-school figures, as she had in May for a prior school year. Coleman-Mitchell now says she plans to publish the most recent statistics – from the 2018-19 year – on the health department’s website in October.

Statewide data released in August show the number of students who claimed the religious exemption increased by 25 percent between the 2017-18 and 2018-19 school years – the largest single-year jump in people choosing the exemption since the department began tracking immunization data a decade ago.

Additionally, the percentage of kindergarteners who were vaccinated against measles, mumps and rubella decreased between those school years, to 95.9 percent, down from 96.5 percent.

“We’ve been hearing from many parents of immunocompromised children who are terrified at the prospect of sending their children to school in a situation where they may not be safe,” Looney said. “That is why the aggregate data of 95 percent or so is of no real help and no real comfort to those families. They need to know exactly what the immunization level is in the schools their children attend.”

The medical and scientific communities overwhelmingly vouch for the safety and efficacy of childhood vaccinations, and peer-reviewed studies consistently find no link to autism, a frequent concern raised by parents wary of vaccines.

Proponents of the religious exemption gathered outside the governor’s office Monday, where state leaders held their press conference. Waving signs and shouting, they accused lawmakers of having inappropriate ties to the pharmaceutical industry and questioned the urgency of rolling back the exemption.

“There is no emergency,” said Barbara Rudini of Trumbull. “We don’t believe there’s any true concern for immunocompromised children at this time.”

Vaccine skeptics questioned lawmakers’ ties to the pharmaceutical industry.
Vaccine skeptics questioned lawmakers’ ties to the pharmaceutical industry.

Megan Belval of Avon called the push by lawmakers a “nonsensical removal of our constitutional rights.”

“This is all backwards,” she said. “There is no health emergency. Has anyone died from measles? … This is horrible that our legislators who work for us are getting away with this. It is wrong. They will be on the wrong side of history.”

House Majority Leader Matt Ritter, D-Hartford, a strong supporter of eliminating all but medical exemptions, said the opponents are passionate and will create some “rough seas” for lawmakers next year.

Legislators face re-election in 2020, but Lamont said he was unwilling to postpone action on the issue. Republican leaders were invited but did not attend Monday’s announcement.

“I’m going to take the lead on this. We’ve got the facts. We’ve got the public health leaders. We’ve got the religious leaders,” Lamont said. “I’ll go to every community I can to tell them why I think this is so important.

“This is the time for us to make this right decision. It’s in the best interests of our kids, it’s in the best interests of our families and we’re going to get this passed.”

Jenna is CT Mirror’s Health Reporter, focusing on health access, affordability, quality, equity and disparities, social determinants of health, health system planning, infrastructure, processes, information systems, and other health policy. Before joining CT Mirror Jenna was a reporter at The Hartford Courant for 10 years, where she consistently won statewide and regional awards. Jenna has a Master of Science degree in Interactive Media from Quinnipiac University and a Bachelor or Arts degree in Journalism from Grand Valley State University.

Join the Conversation


  1. Deplorable and outrageous. There is no crisis. There is no threat. The threat is CT’s ongoing assault on the rights of parents. Shame on them.

    The Commissioner didn’t “find her voice” – she was bullied into doing what Lamont and a small group of legislators pressured her to do to try and justify the political agenda.

    This has nothing to do with health.

    1. You are aware that there a significant
      outbreak of measles this past year, right? There were 1241 reported cars in the US this past year, inclajor outbreaks in New York, NY City, and New Jersey. Virtually all of them were unvaccinated people. If an unvaccinated child brings the disease into school and infects other children, do those parents have a right to sue the parents of unvaccinated children to cover their medical bills and expenses?

      1. There is not a single child who had measles in this state last year. None. Not one. The “outbreaks” were in small communities and what happened? Nothing. They got better and are immune for life. How exactly is an unvaccinated child going to infect a child who is vaccinated? By the CDC’s own admission, there are nearly 1,000,000 adults walking around thinking they are vaccinated when they are not. Who is getting sick? No one. Because there is no issue or problem. Its a fake crisis manufactured by a small group of legislators with connections to big pharma. This has nothing to do with healthcare. It has to do with government infringements on parental and medical privacy rights. NEVER before has our country gone down this path – which is beyond scary. Informed consent matters. And government has no right to FORCE or mandate medical treatments of any kind on anyone. Outrageous.

Leave a comment