U.S. drone strikes kills Iranian General Qasem Soleimani
The wreckage left near Baghdad Airport after the U.S. drone attack.

Updated at 4:40 p.m.  

Washington – Connecticut’s lawmakers joined their Democratic colleagues Friday in questioning President Donald Trump’s reasons for killing Iranian General Qassem Soleimani. Warning of reprisals and the possibility of regional war,  they demanded the president explain his actions and receive authority from Congress before escalating the conflict.

Sardar Qasem Soleimani

“I am deeply concerned about the dangers of a long-term military confrontation with Iraq,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal said at a press conference in Hartford with Sen. Chris Murphy.

The U.S. airstrike that killed Soleimani, widely seen as the second most powerful — and perhaps most popular — figure in Iran, has sharply divided lawmakers concerned that a major escalation of tensions with Iran was undertaken without first alerting Congress.

Trump said the early-morning drone attack that killed Soleimani was necessary because the Iranian commander was planning massive attacks against U.S. personnel in Iraq and throughout the Middle East.

“Soleimani was plotting imminent and sinister attacks on American diplomats and military personnel, but we caught him in the act and terminated him,” Trump said on Friday afternoon.

He called Soleimani “the number one terrorist in the world, and said ” for years, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and its ruthless Quds Force — under Soleimani’s leadership — has targeted, injured, and murdered hundreds of American civilians and servicemen. “

Republicans lauded the president’s actions.

“It should be clear to Iran that President Trump will not sit idly by if our people and interests are threatened,” said Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C.

But Democrats said the air strike took the nation one step closer to war with Iran and put the U.S. in peril. Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said “severe revenge awaits the criminals” behind the attack.

“The unilateral decision by President Trump to strike down a bad actor such as Soleimani unfortunately does not close the book on the threat Iran poses to America,” said Rep. Joe Courtney, D-2nd District, in a statement.

Courtney, a member of the House Armed Services Committee, said “not consulting with the American people, congressional leadership and our allies before taking this escalatory action in a part of the world where we have been entangled for 18 long years is the wrong way to isolate Iranian bad behavior and wind down our involvement in the Middle East.”

Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-3rd District, said she is concerned the air strike will result in a new regional conflict. “The actions authorized by President Trump may have accomplished their tactical objective, but I am deeply concerned by the ripple effects this attack may have by destabilizing the region,” she said.

Blumenthal, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said the United States should “take immediate action to protect our security abroad and at home.”

Murphy, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, agreed “the worry is that action [Trump] took is going to precipitate attacks on the United States.”

Democrats insisted the president did not have authority to escalate the conflict in an act that Rep. John Larson said was “tantamount to an act of war.”

Trump, however, said ” We took action last night to stop a war.  We did not take action to start a war. “

The president also said the United States has “the best military by far, anywhere in the world,” and “the  best intelligence in the world. “

“If Americans anywhere are threatened, we have all of those targets already fully identified, and I am ready and prepared to take whatever action is necessary,” Trump said .”And that, in particular, refers to Iran.”

Democrats say the Authorization for Use of Military Force, or AUMF, that Congress approved in 2002 to authorize the war against Iraq does not extend to aggression against Iran. “There is no war authorization against the state of Iran,” Murphy said.

Blumenthal said whether Trump had authority for the air strikes is debatable. “But the question of war with Iran is not debatable.”

Larson, D-1st District, said “the president has the power to use his executive authority for limited strikes; however, only Congress has the sole power to declare war.”

Rep. Jim Himes, D-4th District, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, tweeted “the Constitution vests Congress, and only Congress, with the decision to go to war.”

Since assuming office, Trump has taken a hard line against Iran, withdrawing from a nuclear deal negotiated with Tehran by former President Obama.

Hostilities had increased recently. An American contractor was killed and four military members were injured in Iraq last week. A U.S. strike killed 25 members of an Iranian-backed militia and injured more than 50 people in Iraq, provoking violent protests outside the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo echoed the president on Friday, saying “there was, in fact, an imminent attack taking place.”

“He was actively plotting in the region to take actions – a big action as he described it — that would have put dozens if not hundreds of American lives at risk. We know it was imminent,” Pompeo told CNN.

Himes, however, warned of the consequences of killing Iran’s top military commander.

“If you think taking out bad guys is its own justification, you need to reflect on the chaos that followed our destruction of (Saddam) Hussein and (Muammar) Qaddafi, neither of whom commanded nation-states when they died,” Himes tweeted.

Democrats are insisting the Trump administration brief Congress immediately about the reasons for the air strike and several said they were ready to return to Washington immediately for those briefings.

“Only (Trump) can justify this attack on a leader of a sovereign nation,” Blumenthal said. “We don’t know the motivation.”

Larson said “Congress should come back in session immediately to be briefed. The gravity of this should give everybody pause,” he continued, “as this airstrike is tantamount to an act of war against Iran,” the Democrat said.

Murphy said he is also concerned the air strike would “push our allies away from us.” The British and German governments have called for a de-escalation of the conflict.

“Where are our allies as we move forward?” Blumenthal asked.

Ana has written about politics and policy in Washington, D.C.. for Gannett, Thompson Reuters and UPI. She was a special correspondent for the Miami Herald, and a regular contributor to The New York TImes, Advertising Age and several other publications. She has also worked in broadcast journalism, for CNN and several local NPR stations. She is a graduate of the University of Maryland School of Journalism.

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

  1. I wonder if Connecticut’s lawmakers were concerned about reprisals and war when President Clinton and Obama ordered similar surgical airstrikes.

    1. Hi Meg Nutter, in the interest of fostering deeper discussion, can you please provide specific examples of when Presidents Clinton and Obama ordered the killing of the second most powerful figure in a country that maintains an openly adversarial stance toward the U.S. and is pursuing nuclear weapons?

      1. Hi CT Mirror, in the interest of fostering deeper discussion, can you please help me understand why we shouldn’t retaliate when our embassy was breached and American lives were at risk, unlike in Benghazi? Can you help me understand why we shouldn’t take out the man responsible for The loss of hundreds of American lives when he was clearly in Iraq to plot more attacks on Americans? Can you help me understand why we negotiated with and delivered pallets of cash to a regime who chants “Death to America” and want America wiped off the map?

      2. “…openly adversarial stance towards the U.S. and is pursuing nuclear weapons…”. And is directly responsible for the death of over 600 US serviceman/women and the maiming of thousands more.

        There fixed it for you. So, he should have been immune because he was the “second most powerful” figure in a country that has been openly at war and called for our destruction for 20+ years?

        By the way, Obama killed thousands without “consulting CongressL beforehand:
        https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/09/america-dropped-26171-bombs-2016-obama-legacy

  2. Courtney—

    “not consulting with the American people, congressional leadership and our allies before taking this escalatory action…

    The POTUS is under no obligation to have done so, and he has since met with Congressional leaders and allies. Beyond that, the consultations Rep Courtney mentions may the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard from a CT politician. Did he want to wait weeks? Did he want to do what Pres Obama did and warn the Iranians the Israelis were about to take him out? (2015)

    Beyond all that, what would Rep Courtney’s response have been had the planned attacks on Americans actually been carried out? I’m sure he would have cried that POTUS knew in advance yet did nothing. Trust me, had those attacks been against our family and friends, I would have held these Democrats PERSONALLY responsible, a la former Dem hero, Cindy Sheehan.

    1. Hi Papa Blue Stars, in the interest of fostering deeper discussion, here is the broader context for Rep. Courtney’s comments: As a reported by the Wall Street Journal yesterday, “The 1973 resolution calls for the president to consult with Congress before introducing the U.S. military into hostilities, and to ‘consult regularly’ with Congress until the end of U.S. involvement.” The article goes on to note that legal scholars currently are divided as to whether Gen. Soleimani’s plotting constituted an “imminent attack,” which would have allowed the president to launch the strike without consulting with Congress.

      https://www.wsj.com/articles/sen-kaine-to-file-resolution-calling-for-debate-prior-to-any-possible-iran-war-11578072521

  3. Connecticut’s elected delegation looks and sounds vindictive and petty with their pronouncements on the legitimacy of President Trump’s actions. I guarantee the majority of state residents see Soleimani‘s death as a positive in the War on Terror.

  4. Only a passing one sentence mention of the Iranian attack on our embassy in Baghdad which was likely plotted by Soleimani. An embassy is US territory so Soleimani was responsible for an attack on US territory. Even that attack on our territory is excused in the article since we “provoked” it.

    On Tuesday, Murph said that Trump has, “rendered America impotent in the Middle East”, then tweeted, that we have been,”reduced to huddling in safe rooms, hoping the bad guys will go away. What a disgrace”, and yesterday he criticizes the president for eliminating the person responsible for an attack on American soil because he likens it to the “assassination of our Secretary of Defense.” Soleimani has not been working on the defense in 2 decades. He was a bloodthirsty murderer always on the offense.

    Yes, Mr. Murphy, “What a disgrace” you are. I wish there was this much outrage in the media and among the pols when Obama droned down Anwar al-Awlaki. That was murder this was justifiable homicide

Leave a comment
Cancel reply