Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

Irony not dead in this CT campaign finance fight

  • Politics
  • by Mark Pazniokas
  • June 16, 2015
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"
Chris Shays after conceding his loss in a GOP primary for U.S. Senate in 2012.

CTMIRROR.ORG

Chris Shays after conceding his loss in a GOP primary for U.S. Senate in 2012.

The Democratic Party is using federal campaign finance reforms co-sponsored by former U.S. Rep. Chris Shays, a Republican, to challenge a subpoena issued by state elections officials investigating a GOP complaint about the re-election of Gov. Dannel P. Malloy.

Shays said Democrats are exploiting what he says was an unintended consequence of his pushing the Federal Election Commission to be more aggressive: A claim by the FEC of broad jurisdiction over campaign finance that supersedes state law.

“Our law was basically intended for congressional races, Senate and House. We weren’t jumping into gubernatorial elections,” Shays said Tuesday. “It was never intended to govern state races. It was intended to deal with national elections.”

But Democrats are saying that regulations issued by the FEC at Shays’ urging clearly preempt the state elections commission from acting on a complaint that Malloy illegally benefitted from the Connecticut Democratic Party’s federal campaign account.

The use of federal campaign funds to pay for a Democratic Party mailer promoting Malloy’s re-election in the closing weeks of the 2014 campaign is central to a state GOP complaint that raises broader issues about Connecticut’s ability to regulate fundraising in state campaigns.

After a bid-rigging scandal led Gov. John G. Rowland to resign and plead guilty to federal corruption charges, the Connecticut General Assembly passed sweeping campaign finance reform in 2005, including a ban on state-contractor contributions to state campaigns.

Contractors remain free to contribute up to $10,000 to the state parties’ federal accounts, which can be used to pay for get-out-the-vote (GOTV) activities in federal election years, when candidates for state office also are on the ballot in Connecticut.

“The Federal Election Commission has made clear that the fact that a communication containing GOTV information refers only to a candidate for state office does not exempt the communication from being ‘Federal election activity,’ ” David S. Golub, a lawyer for the Democrats, says in a letter to the commission.

The letter dated June 15 says the Connecticut Democratic State Central Committee “respectfully declines to comply with the subpoena.”

Quoting the FEC, Golub wrote, “The key issue is not whether the communication refers solely to a non-federal candidate, but rather whether the communication is GOTV…activity.”

Shays, who represented the 4th District and left Congress after losing re-election in 2008, said that the Democrats are turning logic on its head, using a federal reform law to limit the reach of a state reform law.

Congress passed the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, which was widely known as McCain-Feingold in the Senate and Shays-Meehan in the House for its sponsors in those chambers. One of its goals to was keep lightly monitored “soft money” from seeping into federal campaigns.

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy

CTMirror.org file photo

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy

To do that, the Federal Election Commission eventually adopted regulations — after being nudged by a lawsuit filed by Shays — requiring that strict federal rules apply to all election activity in federal election years.

Shays said there never was intent to undermine states with stricter rules, such as Connecticut, which has a voluntary public financing program in which participants agree to accept maximum contributions of no more than $100 and strict spending limits.

“Good grief, you are accepting state dollars, you are accepting taxpayer money, abide by the rules applying to that,” Shays said.

Technically, Malloy did, since the mailer was sent by the party, not his campaign. But Shays said campaigns are about more than technicalities.

David S. Golub

Silver Golub Teitel

David S. Golub

“In order for the laws to work, there has to be a moral imperative that candidates obey the letter of the law and the spirit of the law,” Shays said.

Democrats say the mailer was legitimate federal election activity as it contained an exhortation to vote on behalf Democrats with information about polling hours.

“That was minimal,” said Cheri Quickmire, executive director of Common Cause in Connecticut, a campaign finance reform group. “It was clearly a Malloy election piece.”

Leigh Appleby, a spokesman for Connecticut Democrats, said the party is seeking clarity.

“As we have said since day one, what we need here is clarity from an impartial authority over which set of laws apply to state parties during federal election cycles; because as we have always maintained, we followed all rules, laws and regulations as we interpreted them,” he said in an email. “The underlying facts of this case have never been in dispute. This is an important legal issue that impacts not just the Democratic Party, but also the Republican Party, and candidate committees alike, in present and future campaigns in Connecticut.”

A spokesman for the State Elections Enforcement Commission declined comment on Golub’s refusal to answer the subpoena or his claims of federal preemption.

The commission’s eventual response is likely to be to sue in Superior Court and seek an order compelling compliance with the subpoena.

Golub appears to be inviting such a lawsuit. The commission has declined to address the federal preemption issue, and by refusing to comply with the subpoena Golub could be pushing the issue before a court.

“They’ve done everything they can to avoid getting a ruling on pre-emption,” Golub said Tuesday in an interview. “They are going to have to decide if they want to go to court.”

The Connecticut Democrats requested a declaratory ruling about the use of federal campaign funds for the Malloy mailer from the Federal Election Commission, then withdrew the request before the FEC could publicly respond.

Still, Golub is portraying the State Elections Enforcement Commission as the one unwilling to jointly resolve how state and federal election laws apply to the Malloy mailer.

“There is going to be a ruling on the federal pre-emption issue, and they have to decide if they want to address it head-on or whether they want to keep skirmishing left and right,” Golub said. “I think what they are doing is unseemly.”

Golub also is challenging the authority of the commission to issue what he called an investigatory subpoena under state law, while the law does empower the commission to subpoena witnesses or require the production of documents for a hearing.

The full reach of the commission’s subpoena authority is untested, in part because the panel rarely needs to issue them. Most investigations, the commission says, involve the voluntary production of documents.

Golub said the subpoena served on the Democrats was “wildly overbroad and impermissibly intrudes on protected First Amendment communications.” It seeks documents and records of meetings and conversations, including those between Malloy and Jonathan Harris, the party’s former executive director, going back 2½ years.

Golub said in his letter and during the interview that he has attempted to cooperate.

“The conflict between state and federal law can be resolved through discussion with Connecticut political parties, as I have repeatedly suggested, or by litigation of the federal preemption and First Amendment issues,” Golub wrote. “The Commission’s attempt to avoid the legal issue by resorting to an improper subpoena will, ultimately, further no legitimate interest.”

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Mark Pazniokas is the Capitol Bureau Chief and a co-founder of CT Mirror. He is a frequent contributor to WNPR, a former state politics writer for The Hartford Courant and Journal Inquirer, and contributor for The New York Times.

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
With billions in federal relief on the way to CT, legislators assert their role in deciding how to spend it
by Keith M. Phaneuf and Mark Pazniokas

With an unusual bill, state legislators are reminding Gov. Ned Lamont they have significant role in disbursing federal coronavirus relief.

Rep. Patricia Billie Miller wins vacant Senate seat
by Mark Pazniokas

Rep. Patricia Billie Miller, D-Stamford, won a special election to the state Senate.

Final passage of ‘Crown Act’ comes on unanimous vote
by Mark Pazniokas

With a unanimous vote, Connecticut became the latest state to adopt legislation prohibiting discrimination based on hairstyles associated with race.

Senate confirms Miguel Cardona as U.S. Secretary of Education
by Adria Watson

Cardona was the youngest principal in the state of Connecticut.

Nora Dannehy named top legal aide to Lamont
by Mark Pazniokas

The hiring of Nora Dannehy brings a high-profile legal talent into Lamont's office at the mid-point of his four-year term.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion The public health bill no one is talking about, but should be
by Brian Festa

On February 16,  the legislature's Public Health Committee conducted a public hearing on two bills, S.B. 568 and H.B. 6423, both of which would eliminate the religious exemption to mandatory vaccinations for Connecticut schoolchildren.  The hearing was capped at 24 hours, depriving nearly 1,500 members of the public who had registered for the hearing their opportunity to be heard.  The vast majority of those who did testify, and who submitted written testimony, opposed the bill.  The committee is expected to vote on the bill as early as  today. 

Opinion Students need more resources, fewer officers
by Tenille Bonilla

"School resource officer" is just a nice way to say cop. But what students really need is more resource and less officer.

Opinion The Board of Regents’ changes must not shortchange its students or faculty
by Carrie Andreoletti, PhD

As a university professor and a lifespan developmental psychologist, I tend to approach my work from a developmental perspective. This means I aim to foster a lifelong love of learning and to help others find a sense of meaning and purpose, as well as confidence in their ability to reach their goals. My approach to higher education is shaped by my desire to provide the best possible education for my students. This is why the recent Board of Regents’ proposed changes at the four state universities have me worried.

Opinion How to close schooling opportunity gaps created by the pandemic
by Carol Gale

We ask school district leaders to trust your public servants whose daily work life involves assessing student needs and planning or modifying instruction to meet those needs. Listen to their voices, as we have, and allocate precious resources on interventions that will offer increased opportunities for Hartford students to succeed.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO