Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

CT is Exhibit A in antitrust fight against Anthem-Cigna merger

  • Health
  • by Ana Radelat
  • October 5, 2016
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

Washington – In its court battle to block the merger of Anthem and Cigna, the U.S. Justice Department plans to use Connecticut’s market as a prime example of why increased consolidation in the health insurance field would hurt consumers.

Depending on the area of the state, Anthem is the largest seller of individual and group policies, with either Cigna or Aetna in second or third place, said Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen, who has joined the lawsuit along with his counterparts in 10 other states and the District of Columbia.

Cigna headquarters in Bloomfield

Cigna Corp.

Cigna headquarters in Bloomfield

“It was clear to us, with our casual knowledge of the other states, that if Connecticut had not decided to participate in the lawsuit, (the state) would have been a focal point of the case anyhow,” Jepsen said.

The federal lawsuit against the Anthem-Cigna merger, and a twin lawsuit against a proposed merger between Aetna and Humana, both filed on July 21, promise to be among the greatest antitrust battles the Justice Department has undertaken.

Dozens of lawyers are involved – Anthem alone has 38 attorneys assigned to the case – thousands of pages of court documents have already been filed and millions of dollars will be spent on persuading federal judges during the holiday season that the consolidations will either hurt consumers or create efficiencies that will spur innovation and cut health care costs.

A lot is at stake if for the insurers if the merger is not approved. Aetna must pay Humana a $1 billion breakup fee if the deal does not go through. Anthem would pay a breakup fee to Cigna of  $1.85 billion. The result of the lawsuits will impact millions of Americans.

Jepsen is working to bolster the case against his wife’s former employer – Cigna – because he is convinced, as is the Justice Department, that it would suppress competition.

He said the overlap of Anthem’s and Cigna’s markets is greatest in the state’s largest metropolitan areas, Hartford, New Haven, Bridgeport-Stamford, New London and Torrington.

Because of the outsized impact of the merger on them, Connecticut, and California will serve as co-lead counsels to the Justice Department in the Anthem-Cigna case, Jepsen said. Connecticut Assistant Attorney General Rachel Davis will serve as a liaison with the other states that have joined the lawsuit and attend depositions.

Insurers win early victories

The insurers have won some early victories.

Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, who has been assigned the case against Anthem and Cigna, and Judge John D. Bates, who will hear the Aetna-Humana case, have granted the insurers’ requests for expedited court schedules.

The Anthem-Cigna trial will begin on Nov. 21 and last until Dec. 30, with a decision on Jan. 4. The companies’ merger agreement expires in April 2017.

The Aetna-Humana trial will begin on Dec. 5 and last until Dec. 21, with a decision on Dec. 30.

Under its agreement with Humana, Aetna is required to complete its merger by the end of the year, but the insurer has indicated it will move to extend that deadline under a new agreement with its partner.

The relationship between Anthem and Cigna in this court fight hasn’t been as smooth.

Speaking to investors in early August, Cigna CEO David Cordani said, “Anthem independently decided to pursue the lawsuit with the DOJ.” He said that while Cigna will fulfill its contractual obligations to fight for the merger, it will continue to evaluate its options as they unfold.”

In its legal answer to the Justice Department’s complaint, Cigna said that “after entering into a $54 billion  merger agreement, Anthem and Cigna have disagreed over certain issues, including integration planning.”

To bolster its case, the Justice Department has asked Anthem and Cigna to produce documents that detail escalating “governance disputes” between the two companies, arguing they prove that the deal would not go as smoothly as the insurers claim.

The insurers won a break when the Justice Department decided last month to drop one of its major arguments against the merger – that it would reduce competition in many of the Affordable Care Act’s health exchanges.

The DOJ said it was amending its complaint “in light of the expedited discovery and  trial schedules in this case.”

But the Justice Department also said it did not waive its right “to pursue any allegation or claim related to the markets referenced in (its complaint) in any separate litigation or administrative proceeding outside of this case.”

Legal Strategies

The Justice Department says a merger between Aetna and Humana will shrink competition in “Medicare Advantage” plans, an alternative for many seniors to traditional Medicare.

“Aetna’s proposed $37 billion merger with Humana would lead to higher health-insurance prices, reduced benefits, less innovation, and worse service for over a million Americans,” the DOJ complaint says.

In its legal response, Aetna rebuts the allegation, saying, “The efficiencies generated from the proposed transaction will allow the merged company to provide better and more cost-effective health insurance products to American consumers, including seniors and low- and moderate-income individuals and families”

The insurer argues that the merger “will combine two companies with complementary businesses, cultures, and philosophies, and foster more rapid innovation by allowing the merged company to lower its costs, pass those savings on to its customers, and build on the best approaches of the legacy companies in ways (and on a timetable) that cannot occur without the transaction.”

As far as shrinking competition, Aetna argues the federal government’s traditional Medicare program will continue to provide robust competition to its merged Medicare Advantage plans.

Aetna headquarters in Hartford

Aetna

Aetna headquarters in Hartford

Aetna and Humana also have entered into an agreement to sell Molina Healthcare their Medicare Advantage business in 364 geographical markets the DOJ determined would suffer the most from a lack of competition.

The Justice Department, however, says the divestiture isn’t big enough and “nothing would prevent these enrollees,” who may have to switch doctors and hospitals, “from simply switching back to to the Aetna or Humana plan they had originally chosen.”

“Having lost these enrollees, the buyer would not restore the competition that had existed between Aetna and Humana,” the DOJ complaint says.

Anthem’s aggressive defense

Anthem and Cigna have disputed dozens of DOJ allegations, including the way the federal government has determined a market would be uncompetitive, putting pressure on the Justice Department to present its case in an expedited time.

The DOJ has been frequently put on the defensive. On Oct. 1, it asked the  court to deny Anthem its request for the federal government’s “pre-complaint” market share calculations, arguing they are “privileged information.”

In its court filings Anthem has based its defense on several arguments.

One is that its policies tend to cost less than Cigna’s and that a combined company will result in lower premiums. Companies that self-insure and whose policies are administered by the merged company will  benefit from its ability to drive down payments to providers and hospitals and those companies will pass along the savings to their workers, Anthem said.

It also said the DOJ “admits facts demonstrating that the portion of the $3 trillion in U.S. healthcare spending represented by the combined revenues of Anthem and Cigna is only 3.9 percent.”

It also said that, although Anthem and Cigna are major players in the group insurance market, their overlap is “geographically limited.”

Anthem also argued “new and rapid entry, as well as expansion, by competitors will ensure that there will be no harm to competition, consumers, or consumer welfare.”

David Balto, a former policy director of the Federal Trade Commission who counsels companies on antitrust matters, said the attempt to block the mergers “is one of the biggest actions taken by the Justice Department.”

Balto belongs to a large coalition, including consumer groups, the American Medical Society and the American Hospital Association, who opposed the insurer mergers.

He said the Justice Department will be aided by years of studies by economists who have determined previous insurer consolidation has resulted in higher premiums and poorer care.

“The Justice Department has a compelling, clear story about why these mergers should not happen,” he said.

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Ana Radelat Ana has written about politics and policy in Washington, D.C.. for Gannett, Thompson Reuters and UPI. She was a special correspondent for the Miami Herald, and a regular contributor to The New York TImes, Advertising Age and several other publications. She has also worked in broadcast journalism, for CNN and several local NPR stations. She is a graduate of the University of Maryland School of Journalism.

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Is the state’s vaccine rollout leaving behind Black and Latino residents?
by Jacqueline Rabe Thomas, Kasturi Pananjady and Jenna Carlesso

Rolling out the COVID vaccine to older residents first means it's more likely to go to white residents first.

Lamont edges close to deal on sports betting. Just don’t ask for odds.
by Mark Pazniokas

Connecticut is close to a deal with the tribes over rights to sports betting.

As seniors complain of trouble scheduling COVID vaccines, Connecticut beefs up its appointment phone line
by Jenna Carlesso

Gov. Lamont praised Connecticut's efforts to vaccinate seniors but wasn't as eager to discuss problems with the state's appointment system.

The state’s largest COVID vaccine center is up and running — but so far, there’s no formal plan to pay for it
by Jenna Carlesso and Dave Altimari

State officials say the vaccine rollout is similar to the mass testing plans and hunt for protective equipment last spring.

Pandemic eases, and complicates, legislating
by Mark Pazniokas

The legislature’s Labor and Public Employees Committee co-chairs skipped the masks, but they were very socially distant.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion Education is the cornerstone of democracy
by John J. Petillo

The events of January 6 represent an inflection point for our democracy and, in truth, for our concept of civil society. Much has already been written about the political and cultural tides that swept our nation toward these events —and a real understanding of their significance will not be possible for some time, in part because the reactions and responses to these events are still unfolding as I write.

Opinion A rebuttal to ‘A call to save arms’
by Tyler David Gavitt

A response to "A call to save arms: is vaccination really the solution?" published January 25: The aforementioned article, written by Genevieve Diamant, stands to do potentially significant damage to the efforts by the citizens and government of the State of Connecticut to bring under control the COVID-19 pandemic.

Opinion The Holocaust, history and today’s politics
by Avinoam Patt and Laura Hilton

On January 6 the world watched as domestic terrorists stormed the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, DC.  The pictures seared into our memories of this day are replete with symbols of hatred, racism, and extremism: The Confederate battle flag, the white power hand gesture, and the gallows erected near the Capitol reflecting pool. What many may not have noticed within this sea of white supremacy was the prominence of anti-Semitic images.

Opinion Sticker shock
by Eric W. Kuhn

It would award a modest amount to families making less than $203k in the first year of the program, ramping up to as much as $1,800 in year four. On a sliding scale, the money would also go to families making up to $682,000 a year. Really? That's 8.7 times the median household income in America.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO