East Hartford — United Technologies Corporation took the lead Wednesday in rebutting suggestions that its post-merger headquarters move to Massachusetts reflected poorly on Connecticut. So it wasn’t exactly damage control that brought Gov. Ned Lamont and Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz to Augie & Ray’s.
The venerable roadside burgers-and-dog joint sits on the edge of UTC’s sprawling Pratt & Whitney plant here, long a touchstone for Democrats campaigning for votes or maybe just a little reassurance. Lamont was intent on being seen mixing with unionized workers happy to say that the merger with Raytheon Co. was no big thing.
And he found them, helped by the unions.
Paul Duff, a fourth-generation UTC employee, came down from Collins Aerospace Systems in Windsor Locks, where change has been a constant in the age of mergers and acquisitions. His UTC subsidiary has been Hamilton-Standard, Hamilton Sundstrand, UTC Aerospace and, now, Collins.
“To me, it’s been going on since the 90s,” Duff said.
Of course, Greg Hayes helped, too. And on Fox Business, no less.
Hayes, the chairman and chief executive officer of UTC, politely shut down Fox host Maria Bartiromo when she suggested that the decision to headquarter the new company on Raytheon’s turf outside Boston might be another example of Connecticut driving away a company with its economic policies.
“Did that have something to do with it? A number of Republicans have been saying, look here is another example of Connecticut and its high taxes driving another major company out to Boston with this merger,” Bartiromo asked.
“I would just say that’s patently false,” Hayes replied. “The rational for this was as a merger of equals we make compromises. We make compromises on the name. We make compromises on the board composition. We make compromises on headquarters location. Connecticut remains a big, big base for United Technologies.”
Then Hayes went a step further, repeating a Lamont talking point that the recently passed budget was another step towards fiscal responsibility.
“This is not about Connecticut being a bad place to invest or a bad place to be. I think it’s got some great, great people. It’s got some great attributes,” Hayes said. “And I think, again, they are getting their fiscal house in order, which is the key to the long-term success of the state of Connecticut.”
All of that put Lamont in a good mood long before he arrived at Augie & Ray’s, where he would spring for cheeseburgers and dogs, though not the John Larson Special, an egg, cheese, peppers and tomato sandwich named for the congressman. Lamont feigned surprise when greeted by TV cameras in the parking lot.
“I wasn’t planning on a press conference, actually,” said Lamont, laughing. He added, he wanted to “go tell a few folks how happy Susan and I are that Pratt & Whitney is not only staying right here, but it’s standing right here. And you know why? That’s ‘cause we have the best-trained, most-productive, best-educated work force in the world. And they don’t go anywhere else, but right here.”
Lamont, a businessman elected in November, has tied improving Connecticut’s business climate to modernizing its transportation infrastructure, which he says necessitates a comprehensive system of electronic highway tolls on the Merritt Parkway and Interstates 84, 91 and 95. Legislators declined to bring his plan to a vote in the annual session that ended on June 5.
He will meet next week with legislative leaders to begin talks on whether tolls and other forms of transportation funding can be addressed in a special session.
Asked about Hayes’ comments, Lamont said he saw it as a message to legislators “who have sort of taken this as an opportunity to badmouth the state, badmouth our budget. He said stop, right here and now.”
But Hayes also noted that greater Boston provides a greater talent pool, echoing what everyone from corporate relocation experts to urban policy analysts have observed: There is a move back to the cities, in part because that is where the next generation of workers want to be. And that is a problem for Connecticut, which has no city with a population of more than 145,000.
“We have to do a better job of bringing our cities to life, and we’re working on that every day,” he said. Pressed for details, he pointed to transportation.
“Let us get going on a 21st Century transportation that has Hartford, New Haven and Bridgeport as transportation hubs” with connections throughout the state, he said.
This story misses the point. The people managing the new company will no longer be in Connecticut nor will they feel obligated to support us. The fact is Massachusetts, now has an opportunity to convince those managers (and small business owners who support them with services) to grow their business in Massachusetts NOT Connecticut – where total overall taxes are now lower (and going down), cost of living is also lower AND they have Boston. Competing for business is a zero sum that we are losing because we have no competitive edge.
Let’s see what actually happens.
Ah, the classic break-up line: “It’s not you….it’s me”. In the history of relationships, every single person has been self aware enough to see it as the lie that it is. Until now, apparently.
As always, legislative power can only be abused when the voting populace suffer from short-term memory loss.
It was only 5 years ago, Gov Malloy and Catherine Smith of the CT DECD awarded Pratt & Whitney with over $400,000,00.00 of Stranded Tax Credits. Do you think Mr Hayes would put this in jeopardy by branding the current administration and its supporters, as being fiscally inept? Additionally,
once UTC starts to make an exodus from the State of Connecticut, it will have a very large commercial real estate portfolio to liquidate. I am not sure promoting what a bad place the State of Connecticut is to do business. would enhance the value of that portfolio, or the stature of Mr Hayes as CEO.
No matter how Hayes, Malloy Jr. and the liberal media spin it, the bottom line is this is a disaster for Connecticut. If they made their headquarters here, that would be good news. Instead, due to the political climate in CT, companies like Stag Arms and GE have or are leaving Connecticut in varying degrees. Now UTC is starting to pull out. The working class and young people are also leaving while we see an influx of dependent people come here due to our status as a welfare magnet state. The people in CT have voted for our politicians and they are getting what they asked for. In turn, other people are voting with their feet and leaving for less radical states.