Anne Dauphinais, right, stands next to vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy during his visit to the state Capitol in March. Mark Pazniokas /
Anne Dauphinais, right, stands next to vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy during his visit to the state Capitol in March. Mark Pazniokas /

Five Republican legislators are urging Connecticut’s new health commissioner not to take a position on the effort to repeal the state’s religious exemption to vaccines.

The lawmakers – State Reps. Anne Dauphinais, R-Killingly; Mike France, R-Ledyard; Craig Fishbein, R-Wallingford; Rick Hayes, R-Putnam; and David Wilson, R-Litchfield – sent a letter to Department of Public Health Commissioner Renee Coleman-Mitchell saying it would be improper for her to offer an opinion on the contentious issue.

Democratic legislative leaders have asked Coleman-Mitchell for her input on whether the exemption should be repealed.

“We believe it is wholly inappropriate for the legislators to be seeking your opinion regarding the elimination of the religious exemption in Connecticut,” the Republicans wrote in their letter, dated July 30. “That is a question of constitutional and civil rights law. It is not the charge of your agency to offer opinions on civil rights issues; the state has other agencies that are responsible for those matters.”

“Therefore,” they added, “we implore you to refrain from offering any opinion on the elimination of the religious exemption.”

In June, Democratic leaders in the House and Senate asked the commissioner whether they should move forward with abolishing religious waivers to vaccines. It was the second time they had publicly called for her opinion on the issue. Coleman-Mitchell so far has deflected the requests, saying she would review the inquiries and respond “as soon as possible.”

She declined to comment on the letter from Republicans.

“We did receive the letter you are referencing and have no response to it,” the commissioner said through a spokesman Monday. “We are currently working on a response to the letter on a similar topic from legislative leadership.”

The Democrats, who are planning to revive their quest to curtail the exemption next year, have kept pressure on the commissioner. A review of efforts in New York, Washington and Maine – all of which succeeded in repealing religious or philosophical provisions this year – show those states had the backing of their public health officials. Connecticut lawmakers said they are looking for similar support.

But the Republicans want Coleman-Mitchell to stay out of it. In addition to refraining from the exemption debate, they have asked her not to push for legislation that would increase vaccination rates.

The state’s public health department in May released for the first time its school-by-school assessment of child immunization rates. The data showed 102 schools where fewer than 95 percent of kindergarten students were vaccinated against measles, mumps and rubella – the threshold recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

That touched off a flood of concerns from state leaders, who by then had recorded three measles cases in Connecticut.

Gov. Ned Lamont said the data was “startling” and needed to be addressed.

But the five Republicans, all of whom are members of the legislature’s conservative caucus, say there is “absolutely no threat to public health in the state.”

“Even if there were,” they wrote in the letter, “increasing vaccination rates would not resolve it. … The weight of scientific authority simply does not support the CDC’s recommendations.”

“We urge you to be courageous and stand on the firm ground of science in truth, rather than retreat into the safe trappings of the cave of political pressure,” they said.

The Republicans closed their letter with a quote from Pope Paul VI: “If you want peace, work for justice.”

Dauphinais, a vocal critic of plans to repeal the religious exemption, was active in bringing Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who founded an anti-vaccine organization, to the state Capitol in March. Kennedy delivered a PowerPoint presentation in a hearing room, joined by a half-dozen sympathetic lawmakers and more than 100 parents, on the need for more stringent testing of vaccines before their release, along with his opposition to mandatory immunizations.

Dauphinais could not be reached for comment Monday.

House Majority Leader Matthew Ritter, one of the Democrats seeking Coleman-Mitchell’s opinion, disagreed with the Republicans’ take.

“It was not wholly inappropriate for us to ask,” he said. “They are entitled to their own opinion, but they are not entitled to their own facts and on this one they are wildly off base.”

Senate President Pro Tempore Martin Looney, another Democrat who has requested the commissioner’s input, called the Republicans’ comments “shocking and irresponsible.”

“Vaccination rates in our public schools are first, last, and foremost a matter of public health,” he said. “Reason and logic dictate that the Commissioner of the Department of Public Health advise our state on issues involving public health.”

“I find it shocking and irresponsible to claim that there ‘is absolutely no threat to public health’ for over 100 Connecticut schools to have vaccination rates under the recommended threshold by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,” Looney added. “We have seen outbreaks of diseases in communities just over the border in New York and around the country.”

Ritter said the letter’s authors will ultimately “have to answer to the voters” about their “ill-founded opinions.”

“It appears to me that you have legislators who believe that vaccinations are junk science,” he said. “They believe they know more than the CDC, and they are incredibly out of step with Connecticut residents on this issue.”

Jenna is CT Mirror’s Health Reporter, focusing on health access, affordability, quality, equity and disparities, social determinants of health, health system planning, infrastructure, processes, information systems, and other health policy. Before joining CT Mirror Jenna was a reporter at The Hartford Courant for 10 years, where she consistently won statewide and regional awards. Jenna has a Master of Science degree in Interactive Media from Quinnipiac University and a Bachelor or Arts degree in Journalism from Grand Valley State University.

Join the Conversation


  1. These lawmakers cannot be serious in thinking that the Commissioner of Public Health should have no say on the issue of vaccine exemption. If there was ever a public health issue, this is it. Trying to re-frame it as solely a “constitutional civil rights” issue is ridiculous.
    This should enrage Commissioner Coleman-Mitchell and make it more likely for her to speak out.

    1. Sorry Doctor but is is a “constitutional civil rights” issue. Medical freedom and medical choice are imperative to a free society. There is no health crisis and a few cases of a skin infection is no reason to try to take away people’s God given rights to make informed decisions for themselves and their families!

  2. Neither this is a religious question (please keep the Pope out of it) as no major religion opposes vaccination. In fact, catholic morality teaches that parents must use all required means to protect their children and community.

    What is more baffling (or perhaps not) is law makers suggesting that addressing barriers to vaccination and protection from disease is not a matter of public health.

    “That is a question of constitutional and civil rights law. It is not the charge of your agency to offer opinions on civil rights issues; the state has other agencies that are responsible for those matters.”
    Anne Dauphinais, R-Killingly: Pharma Sales Consultant
    Mike France, R-Ledyard: Electrical Engineer. Navy Officer
    Craig Fishbein, R-Wallingford: Lawyer
    Rick Hayes, R-Putnam: Police officer
    David Wilson, R-Litchfield: Financial Advisor

Leave a comment