Waiting outside the governor's office, there was no celebration by non-profit advocates. Mark Pazniokas / CT Mirror
Nonprofit advocates staked out the governor’s office during last year’s legislative session. Mark Pazniokas / CT Mirror
Nonprofit advocates staked out the governor’s office during last year’s legislative session. Mark Pazniokas / CT Mirror

Connecticut’s largest coalition of nonprofit agencies urged Gov. Ned Lamont’s administration to avoid cutting community-based social services as it seeks to close a small hole in state finances.

The CT Community Nonprofit Alliance, which has been pressing Lamont to pump more resources into the hundreds of agencies that deliver the bulk of state-sponsored social services, also questioned why emergency cuts are being considered even as state budget reserves are projected to grow.

“We appreciate that the governor is managing the state budget prudently, with an eye on the future,” Gian-Carl Casa, president and CEO of the alliance, wrote in a statement. “But we are greatly concerned that with a de facto $300 million surplus, that there is any discussion of emergency budget cuts. We urge Governor Lamont to reject proposals that would cut essential services.”

Lamont’s budget director, Office of Policy and Management Secretary Melissa McCaw, warned in her last monthly budget forecast that the administration was considering emergency spending cuts in response to a modest deficit forecast.

“While the projected shortfall represents only about 0.1 percent of the General Fund, agencies are making efforts to curtail hiring and discretionary expenditures, and the governor is prepared to exercise rescission authority if necessary to mitigate against ending the year with an operating deficit,” McCaw wrote on Dec. 20.

Her office projects the deficit at $23 million, while Comptroller Kevin P. Lembo, who issues the state’s official budget projection, pegs it at $28 million. Both represent a tiny fraction, roughly 1/7th of 1%, of this fiscal year’s General Fund.

State law gives the governor tremendous discretion to unilaterally rescind spending ordered by the legislature, allowing line-item reductions of 5% or less in many areas. 

Traditionally, those cuts have fallen heaviest on higher education, community-based social service programs not backed by Medicaid, and miscellaneous state agency accounts.

Gian-Carl Casa, president and CEO of the CT Community Nonprofit Alliance Arielle Levin Becker / CTMirror.org file photo

“Connecticut residents rely on state-contracted, community-based nonprofits for a wide range of vital services, including substance abuse and mental health treatment, support and residential programs for people with developmental disabilities, homeless and domestic violence shelters, re-entry programs and more,” said Casa, whose organization represents more than 500 nonprofits. “Community programs are some of the most cost-effective state services and are already stretching limited state dollars to continue operating. Without these vital programs, the costs of care would only increase, for more expensive emergency treatment.”

Chris McClure, spokesman for the govenor’s budget office said “Governor Lamont does not take his rescission authority lightly and would not exercise the authority without a comprehensive review of the affected expenditure and the impact on our state and its residents. Stabilizing our state budget and ensuring we improve Connecticut’s financial position are essential to mitigating volatility and reducing the uncertainty that has plagued our state over the recent decades, limited our growth, and caused service reductions during difficult times.”

Currently, more than a half-dozen state departments collectively spend roughly $1.4 billion to hire private, nonprofit agencies to provide social services, health care, job training and other government functions for the poor, disabled, and those struggling with mental illness and addiction.

Though these resources are scattered among more than 1,200 contracts, involving hundreds of nonprofits, together these payments represent more than 7% of the General Fund.

In terms of dollars, that’s larger than the departments of Transportation, Correction and Motor Vehicles combined.

Since 2002, state spending for nonprofits has grown by about 10%. After adjusting for inflation, nonprofits say they have lost money.

The governor declined a request from nonprofits last fall to dedicate as much as $100 million from state budget reserves to help reverse this funding trend.

Connecticut has $2.5 billion in its rainy day fund. And while the General Fund is on pace to finish the fiscal year on June 30 about $28 million in the red, another program that forces the state to save a portion of tax receipts tied to investment income is on pace to add $318 million to the reserve.

Avatar photo

Keith has spent most of his 31 years as a reporter specializing in state government finances, analyzing such topics as income tax equity, waste in government and the complex funding systems behind Connecticut’s transportation and social services networks. He has been the state finances reporter at CT Mirror since it launched in 2010. Prior to joining CT Mirror Keith was State Capitol bureau chief for The Journal Inquirer of Manchester, a reporter for the Day of New London, and a former contributing writer to The New York Times. Keith is a graduate of and a former journalism instructor at the University of Connecticut.

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1. I wish the CT Mirror would do an article on the salaries of the top executives of these non profits. People would be shocked given that much of their funding comes from the state of CT and thus the executives are in fact “state employees”. Gian-Carl Casa President of the Non Profit Alliance makes 200K a year. Look at CW Resources of New Britain IRS Form 990. The President makes 500K and four more people make 400k, 350K, 287K. These people are being paid with state funds. The work is not rocket science. CW Resources has handicap people repackage coffee and sell it to the US Government on set aside contracts. 500K a year to manage that give me a break.

    1. You are absolutely right. These non profit cry the blues about finding and “the most vulnerable”. But it is not true. They too only care about there fat and bloat.

  2. If the services are still being delivered, the state can continue to underpay the non-profits. And if one non-profit goes out of business because of lack of money, another might be able to take over the caseload.
    Consolidation can eventually produce service delivery organizations able to negotiate successfully with the state.
    Adequate payments may also be obtained by involving the courts. Where there’s a mandate to provide services of a certain quality, decisions can be issued requiring levels of qualified staffing which can’t be obtained at current wage rates and state payments. DCF is a state agency, but the court orders obtained may be a model for those which might be sought by the non–profits.
    The state will have to pay more. The question is How the necessary money will be successfully demanded.

Leave a comment