A rendering of the proposed Killingly Energy Center generation facility. NTE Energy
A protester holds up a sign calling for state officials to halt plans for the Killingly plant. Photo courtesy of Not Another Power Plant

Gov. Ned Lamont on Tuesday said the words out loud more straightforward than he ever has: “I don’t want to build Killingly.”

He was referring to the now five-year battle waged by environmentalists and others against building the proposed Killingly Energy Center, a 650-megawatt natural gas power plant. Those who oppose it have argued it flies in the face of Lamont’s executive order for a 100% zero-carbon electric sector by 2040, it does not support his broader commitment to fighting climate change, and it just isn’t needed.

And while he’s hinted that he’s not thrilled with the prospect of the Killingly power plant, he’s never been quite that blunt. His comments were made to more than 300 environmental advocates attending the opening sessions of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters annual legislative priorities summit, held over Zoom this year.

The governor hinted at slowing permitting and being able to “play some games there.” He also hinted that market forces may ultimately take over.

“I’m not positive you’re going to see Killingly built at all,” he said.

Recent analysis by the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection shows electricity demand down 18 percent in the state, though many believe it will come back up as more items, such as heating, become electrified and more people purchase electric vehicles, which will need charging.

The plant has received siting council approval, after two rejections. DEEP has issued an air discharge permit and a water quality certificate for impacts to wetlands.

Still pending is a wastewater discharge permit, which is also needed, and Eversource’s water quality certification for a pipeline to bring the natural gas to the plant. “As a natural gas distribution company, we work to provide service to various potential customers — like the developer of the proposed Killingly power plant,” said Eversource spokesman Mitch Gross.

Samantha Dynowski, state director of Sierra Club Connecticut, which has led much of the opposition to the plant, said the Eversource water quality certification have to address impact on clean water and wildlife. “That permit we believe can and should be rejected,” she said.

The governor’s words were in the right place, Dynowski said: “But they really need to be followed up with action. We can’t just rely on market forces to prevent climate disaster.”

The governor’s office declined to comment on what further action he was willing to take.

DEEP Commissioner Katie Dykes, who also spoke at the summit, addressed Killingly as well, noting that she hears from stakeholders frequently. She reiterated points she has made in the past that because the grid operator, ISO-New England, has committed to buying the power from Killingly, the state is kind of stuck unless the plan does not meet permitting standards.

“I believe that we have to change the system that brought us this plant in the first place. We’re doing that by working with other states to reform the ISO-New England,” she said. “That is the place we can have the greatest and most lasting impact.”

ISO-New England spokeswoman Ellen Foley said an obligation from them doesn’t guarantee Killingly will be built. “Each New England state controls what is built in their state. The ISO has no jurisdiction over those decisions,” she said. “We are committed to harnessing the power of competition to reliably plan and operate the grid as the region transitions to clean energy.”

DEEP did, however, supply a letter of support to the siting council in June 2018, when the council finally approved Killingly.

Since then, the state has come down much harder on the issue of climate change mitigation, and the effort to reform ISO-New England has become a six-state effort, not Connecticut alone, as it was just a year ago.

Killingly’s developer, NTE Energy, declined to respond directly to the governor’s comments but maintained that it will help reduce greenhouse gas emissions by replacing old coal and oil plants.

“It will also enable the addition of more wind, solar and other renewable energy sources to the electric grid,” said Jennifer Logue, NTE’s director of communications. “When the sun stops shining or the wind stops blowing, natural gas-fired plants can ramp up quickly and provide instantaneous, reliable power.”

There is also a legal challenge to the siting council approval pending in state Supreme Court. It contends that council approval was issued without all the permits in place.

Jan Ellen is CT Mirror's regular freelance Environment and Energy Reporter. As a freelance reporter, her stories have also appeared in The New York Times, The Boston Globe, Yale Climate Connections, and elsewhere. She is a former editor at The Hartford Courant, where she handled national politics including coverage of the controversial 2000 and 2004 presidential elections. She was an editor at the Gazette in Colorado Springs and spent more than 20 years as a TV and radio producer at CBS News and CNN in New York and in the Boston broadcast market. In 2013 she was the recipient of a Knight Journalism Fellowship at MIT on energy and climate. She graduated from the University of Michigan and attended Boston University’s graduate film program.

Leave a comment