Hear an outstanding panel of thinkers debate how Connecticut should move forward in the post-pandemic economy.
The Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter discusses the 2021-22 U.S. Supreme Court term, including the court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.
As newspapers fold and online disinformation proliferates, what’s the future of news? How can we preserve its function as a pillar of democracy?
In the first of a series for Steady Habits sponsored by CT Rides, John Dankosky invites experts to look at the impact of COVID-19 on businesses, their employees, and Connecticut’s roadways and transit systems.
CT Mirror Executive Editor Elizabeth Hamilton, former Hartford Courant reporter Daniela Altimari and UConn professor Amanda Crawford joined John Dankosky on April 20, 2022 for a conversation on the future of local journalism. Watch here.
Watch the recording of CT Mirror’s Feb. 8 roundtable event with Jonathan Wharton, Susan Bigelow and Dan Haar.
Watch the recording of CT Mirror’s Feb. 3 event breaking down this session’s expected budget battles.
Watch the recording of CT Mirror’s Feb. 1 event discussing the upcoming legislative session and November elections.
Watch the Dec. 8 panel conversation examining the possibility of regional policy-making, tax-sharing, or even regional governance in Connecticut.
Watch the Nov. 10 panel conversation examining efforts to improve funding, teaching, and parental involvement in Connecticut’s city schools.
Watch the Oct. 20 panel conversation examining the battle for affordable housing in the suburbs and improved housing in cities.
Watch the Sept. 22 panel conversation examining how racism keeps people of color out of “the other Connecticut.”
Bestselling author Jeff Benedict joins John Dankosky for a conversation on “the definitive inside story” of the Patriots. Watch here.
In part two of our conversation, Linda Greenhouse considers whether a smaller, even-numbered future Court might help build more consensus.
The longtime Supreme Court reporter and columnist for the New York Times sees the justices expanding their role in religious issues and further damaging the Voting Rights Act.