Gov. Ned Lamont
Gov. Ned Lamont

In a lead-up to his first budget next week, Gov. Ned Lamont asked Connecticut residents Monday to brace for a lean spending plan that overhauls service delivery, restructures pension debt and broadens the sales tax.

The new governor also asserted that while Connecticut is poised for success, legislators should resist the urge to tap the state’s emergency budget reserves — which must be preserved to guard against the next recession.

“I believe our state is poised for success, with new jobs on the rise, unemployment rates at historic lows, and the growth of established and emerging sectors from wind energy to biotechnology on the horizon,” Lamont wrote in an “open letter” to Connecticut residents. “I also believe that delivering on those opportunities requires a sustained commitment to fiscal stability that will allow Connecticut to turn the page on what’s been holding it back and give you, your employers, and your local governments the confidence you need to thrive.

Guarding against the next recession

Connecticut has dramatically increased its emergency reserve — commonly known as the rainy day fund — over the past 12 months, from about $200 million to $1.2 billion. And some projections say the state could have as much as $2.1 billion in its reserves by this fall. 

But some of that growth is attributed to one-time changes in federal tax policy that are not likely to be repeated.

And with Connecticut and the nation now nine years removed from the last recession, Lamont has warned repeatedly that the rainy day fund — the state’s fiscal cushion against the next economic downturn — should not be touched.

“Our economy has still not fully recovered from the Great Recession more than a decade ago, and we must be prepared for the possibility of another economic downturn,” the governor wrote. “Second, we cannot allow the fact that we are expecting a surplus and the likelihood of a significant deposit to the rainy day fund lull us into a false sense of security and sap the urgency we need to confront our fiscal crisis head-on.”

Lamont warned taxpayers that he’ll “also hold the line on the operating budget, while increasing investments in technology which, over time, will streamline our citizens’ interface with state government and produce real long-term savings. These savings won’t happen overnight, but we can’t continue to put off to tomorrow what we should have begun a decade ago.”

But that doesn’t mean the administration won’t raise taxes.

Lamont pledged not to raise income or sales tax rates, and said he wants to cut income taxes by expanding a credit that helps poor and middle-income families cover local property tax costs.

But to close the projected deficits, Lamont also has said he would broaden the sales tax base by removing sales tax exemptions for certain goods and services.

Earlier this winter, the administration researched ending long-standing exemptions for groceries and prescription medications.

Lamont, who has recently downplayed the likelihood of taxing groceries, hinted Monday about another partial exemption.

“Today, the sales tax is not applied to the fastest growing sectors of our economy including the digital and service economy,” he wrote. “If you go to a store to buy a DVD, you pay sales tax. But if you download that same DVD from a streaming service, you don’t. What sense does that make?”

Lamont added “there are many similar examples in our state’s current sales tax exemptions list and we need to streamline our system and ensure fundamental fairness. Next week, I plan to start a discussion with the legislature about how we can reform the sales tax without raising rates.”

Smoothing spiking pension costs

The fiscal crisis Lamont and the legislature face, in the short-term, involves finances that — without adjustments — are headed for major deficits in the coming years. And the single-largest factor behind those potential shortfalls are surging retirement benefit costs tied to decades of under-funding.

“These fixed costs are not something that we can simply cut, as they are contractual obligations, similar to your mortgage or credit card debt,” Lamont wrote.

His predecessor, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, teamed with unions and the General Assembly in 2017 to adopt a plan to smooth spiking contributions into the state employees’ pension.

Annual contributions to the state employees’ fund were once projected to exceed $6 billion by early 2032 — and then drop to a few hundred million dollars afterward.

Under the 2017 plan, the contribution still would grow from about $1.3 billion this fiscal year to nearly $2.2 billion by 2022. But contributions also would remain above $1.6 billion, at least through 2046, as Connecticut makes up the deferred payments — plus an estimate of the investment returns it could have earned by taking relief now.

The teachers’ pension fund faces a similar doomsday projection, with the annual contribution expected to jump from $1.3 billion this year to as much as $6.2 billion by 2032.

And though Lamont didn’t name the teachers’ pension directly in his letter, he alluded to it.

“In my proposed budget, I’ll suggest a path forward to finally address those (other) fixed costs and reduce the rate of increase,” he wrote.

It’s unclear exactly how Lamont would achieve that. 

That’s because the state borrowed $2 billion in 2008 to shore up the teachers’ pension and pledged to its bond investors not to short-change pension contributions for the life of the 25-year bond issuance.

Former state Treasurer Denise L. Nappier said that if the state wants to pay less into the teachers’ pension fund, it needs to pay off the bonds first. Certain Malloy administration officials disagreed and took a different interpretation of the bond pledge.

Lamont has not said how he would address this legal issue.

Keith has spent most of his 31 years as a reporter specializing in state government finances, analyzing such topics as income tax equity, waste in government and the complex funding systems behind Connecticut’s transportation and social services networks. He has been the state finances reporter at CT Mirror since it launched in 2010. Prior to joining CT Mirror Keith was State Capitol bureau chief for The Journal Inquirer of Manchester, a reporter for the Day of New London, and a former contributing writer to The New York Times. Keith is a graduate of and a former journalism instructor at the University of Connecticut.

Join the Conversation


  1. “But some of that growth is attributed to one-time changes in federal tax policy that are not likely to be repeated.”

    Can someone explain this quote to dumb old me?

  2. The federal tax law changed in 2018 such that many wealthy CT taxpayers choose to record more income for the calendar year ending 2017. This resulted in higher quarterly tax deposits. It is expected that those higher quarterly tax deposits we a one-time event and won’t be repeated. These deposits are also significantly affected by the changes in the stock market and calendar year 2018 saw a small decline.

  3. Monkeying with bond covenants is a slippery slope that could cause state bond downgrades and higher borrowing costs. I’m wondering if the Governor is tamping down on other state borrowing to increase borrowing to cover the unfunded state employee retirement obligations.

    The elephant in the room is unsustainable state pension and healthcare benefits. Who gets virtually free healthcare for life in their older years when healthcare costs are at a maximum? Who gets their high 3 salary in pension after padding their salaries with overtime? Who makes six figures doing the jobs that pay less in the private sector?

    Until we deal with the cause of the problem, we’ll continue to put band aids on major wounds. I think we’re going to bleed out.

Leave a comment