Gov. Ned Lamont dropped a few more breadcrumbs Wednesday on the path he hopes lawmakers are following to his eventual presentation of CT 2030, a plan for spending about $20 billion over the next decade to speed Metro-North trains and ease highway congestion.
The administration gave the Wall Street Journal, a favorite of many commuters who ride the rails, these tidbits: $5 billion will be spent on Metro-North to buy 100 rail cars, replace three century-old bridges and add express service on the Waterbury line.
The new talking point aimed at Fairfield County lawmakers: CT 2030 could produce the first improvements in Metro-North commuter times in a generation, perhaps saving as much as 15 minutes on the ride from New Haven into Grand Central.
Since early September, when his chief of staff shared a basic outline of Lamont’s transportation reboot, the governor has dropped a detail here and a detail there, all while his staff continue to hone the plan and crunch the numbers on cost and financing.
So, when will the final reveal come?
Lamont hedged.
“We’re talking to the legislative leadership every day,” Lamont told reporters. “I just don’t want to get ahead of myself. I want to make sure when we roll this out we have as many people on board as we can.”
Lamont said the administration is making changes based on feedback from lawmakers.
“We briefed everybody, and we’re going to refine that proposal yet again,” Lamont said.
Lamont is visiting New York City on Thursday to meet with the governors of New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania to talk about a common regulatory structure for vaping and, if it is ever legalized in Connecticut, recreational marijuana.
Then attention will return to transportation.
The administration fumbled its initial proposal in February, publishing it in an op-ed that outlined a transportation revenue plan built on a comprehensive system of highway tolls on the Merritt Parkway and Interstates 84, 91 and 95. It fell flat.
Democratic legislative leaders refused to schedule a vote on his plan in either chamber.
The new strategy is to make the case for restoring Connecticut’s highways, bridges and rail system to a state of good repair, then talk about the new revenue necessary to make the plan a reality. Lamont now talks about “user fees,” which most likely will include tolls on a dozen bridges.
Even without transportation enhancements, the state’s special transportation fund is approaching insolvency. The state spends $1.6 billion annually on transportation expenses, which includes $680 million on transportation debt service, $366 million on bus and rail, $290 million on the Department of Transportation and $65.4 million on the Department of Motor Vehicles.
Taxes on motor fuels and oil companies raise $806 million a year for the special transportation fund, about half of what is necessary. The rest comes from sales taxes, motor vehicle receipts and fees.
On Sept. 20, offices from the Build America Bureau of the U.S. Department of Transportation briefed leaders on what they say is a flexible menu of available low-cost credit — less than 2% for highway loans that come with a repayment period of 35 years.
“We have to get in line for it,” Lamont said Wednesday. “They don’t just automatically give it to us.”
Lamont said the state also must identify a revenue stream to pay for it.
The Special Transportation Fund is approaching insolvency in part because Lamont is diverting over 170 million into the General Fund for pensions.
In addition to the redirection of funds from the Special Transportation Fund. I believe current and long term fringe benefit costs for the DOT and State Police were previously shifted to the STF. So, the resultant underfunding was not accidental. It was intentional!
Yup. DMV, DOT, and State Police (Public Safety) pension, benefit, and personnel expenses were shifted into the STF. That’s not what the STF was created for and is a mis-use of it. Shifting those expenses out of the STF will save about $1 Billion over a two year budget period. I wrote about that in a R-A Op-Ed – https://www.rep-am.com/opinion/commentary/2019/07/06/rep-horn-should-reconsider-toll-position/
NO TOLLS. Once it starts. It will never end. Follow the republicans plan to borrow for it. Heck we borrow for everything else around here. Why not transportation. Its funny how its ok to kick the can for those penisons but then have to have a revenue source for transportation. Just put all on the credit card. Don’t worry about putting the debt on our kids. This plan will either work and hopefully restore this proud state. Or it will fail and our kids won’t be here anways when no jobs are here. Only the state employees and welfare foks will he left. Leaving them the bills