Connecticut State Capitol CTMIRROR.ORG
Connecticut State Capitol

State agency overtime expenses continue to creep upward according to a new report from nonpartisan analysts, though overall salary costs remain below those of a decade ago.

The legislature’s nonpartisan Office of Fiscal Analysis reported  late last week that agencies spent $124.9 million on overtime through the first two quarters of the fiscal year, which began on June 30. That’s $5 million — or 4.1% — greater than overtime spending cost the General Fund during the first six months of the previous fiscal year.

The General Fund represents more than 90% of the total state budget and covers the bulk of annual operating costs.

More importantly, those numbers come on the heels of two consecutive years of modest increases in overtime expenses for state government.

Overtime spending for the 2018-19 fiscal year closed at $234.3 million, up 2.7%, according to nonpartisan analysts. In 2017-18, spending in this area totaled $204.4 million, up 14.6%.

Both the latest overtime numbers, as well as the increases over the past two fiscal years, stem largely from decisions made between 2011 and 2018 by then-Gov. Dannel P. Malloy to shrink the state’s workforce.

“A large portion of the overtime use is due to current staffing levels at our agencies,” said Chris McClure, spokesman for the governor’s budget agency, the Office of Policy and Management.  “If an agency is carrying a higher level of vacancies than the prior year, there will likely be a corresponding increase in the overtime costs particularly for our 24/7 operations agencies.”

Openings in hazardous duty positions, such as state police troopers and correction officers, cannot be filled quickly because of both stringent hiring and training requirements.

Five state departments account for the overwhelming bulk of overtime spending this year, including: $38.2 million from Correction; $28.6 million from Mental Health and Addiction Services; $20 million from Developmental Services; $18.9 million from Emergency Services and Public Protection; and $10.9 million from Children and Families.

These five agencies also incurred the vast majority of overtime spending last fiscal year.

Gov. Ned Lamont (left) has continued former Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s practice of restraining the size of Connecticut’s workforce.

McClure also noted many state departments and agencies are faced with increasing number of retirements, a trend that is expected to intensify in the coming years, peaking in 2022 or 2023 as a large portion of the workforce reaches retirement age at the same time.

Overall General Fund salary costs, including regular wages and overtime, stood at $2.43 billion when the last fiscal year ended on June 30.

That’s $133 million — or 5% — less than they were in June 2009, 18 months before Malloy took office.

And if 2009 wage costs are adjusted for inflation, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ inflation calculator, the drop over the past decade stands at nearly 21%.

Malloy reduced the Executive Branch workforce by nearly 10% during his eight years in office. He also obtained union concessions twice, packages that included wage freezes in the 2013, 2018 and 2019 fiscal years.

The former governor relied on attrition, not layoffs, to reduce the workforce throughout most of his tenure, though legislative policy also drove that process.

Lawmakers routinely built huge, loosely defined savings targets into the annual budget, requiring the administration to achieve hundreds of millions of dollars in savings once the fiscal year was underway.

Lamont’s first two-year state budget, which was enacted in June and took effect in July, reduced the number of full-time positions in the budget’s General Fund by about 1,300 jobs, or 3%.

“Governor Lamont is steadfast in his commitment to keeping our state’s fiscal house in order; maintaining a balanced budget, bolstering our savings for the next economic contraction, and continual oversight of overtime use in the Executive Branch,” McClure added. “ … We will continue to make efforts to right-size staffing, enhance resources and service delivery, and find new efficiencies to make state government operate smarter, stronger, and simpler.”

Keith has spent most of his 31 years as a reporter specializing in state government finances, analyzing such topics as income tax equity, waste in government and the complex funding systems behind Connecticut’s transportation and social services networks. He has been the state finances reporter at CT Mirror since it launched in 2010. Prior to joining CT Mirror Keith was State Capitol bureau chief for The Journal Inquirer of Manchester, a reporter for the Day of New London, and a former contributing writer to The New York Times. Keith is a graduate of and a former journalism instructor at the University of Connecticut.

Join the Conversation

7 Comments

  1. OT costs will continue to rise so long as employees can “pad” their retirement with their three highest years.

  2. This is just the beginning. A previous article on here (“Business-owning lawmakers spar over state employees, economic climate”) stated that 30-40% of state employees are likely to retire by 2022 or 2023. So expect to see a huge overtime increase as they bulk up their top 3 years of earnings to turbocharge their Cadillac pensions. They also don’t have to worry about the paid FMLA tax that the rest of us have to pay either.
    I wonder how many overtime hours will be spent “working” from home. Like the state employee who took a new full time job in Florida, but “telecommuted” for 8 months so she could reach 10 years of service and be vested in the pension and Cadillac medical benefits for life. She quit one day after reaching that vesting date, by the way. I guess the stress of the state job was too much.
    Source: Journal Inquirer; “Telecommuting Oversight Urged”; 1/6/2020

    1. Yes, and the so-called justification for keeping her on the payroll after she moved to Florida was just plain nonsense.

  3. So, here’s the thing… because overtime pay is included in the pension calculations, and many of these employees are within several years of retirement, and the pension calculations use the three highest years of pay… what do you suppose this is going to do to pension costs going forward?

  4. I am hoping this increase in overtime, is not part of a “Pension Spiking Scheme”, by those employees considering retirement, in the next three years. It would be in the best interest of the state and taxpayers, to ensure state employees close to retirement are not capturing the lions share of overtime. It might be time to track and balance overtime distribution across these senior employees, to ensure no one is gaming the system, and state taxpayers.

    1. Your hope is misplaced. A precious article said that 30-40% of state employees are likely to retire by 2022/2023. So the three year spike is just beginning.
      That means that in 2024, you’ll see many more 45-55 year old retirees driving around with Florida plates.

  5. Go to the state comptrollers web site and just click on Mental Health and Addiction Services. How are individual employees earning more in OT than base salary? How can these same people work so much OT, year after year? They must not need sleep or they are getting the sleep on the clock. The “Spiked” pensions when they are collected will be beautiful. Even a state as generous as Massachusetts does not allow OT in a pension but here in CT it’s not only allowed but at non human amounts.

Leave a comment
Cancel reply