Gov. Ned Lamont chats with Waterbury Mayor Neil O'Leary at the CCM convention.
Gov. Ned Lamont seemed to promise CCM local aid by Christmas. Not so, says his administration. mark pazniokas /

Gov. Ned Lamont raised hopes Tuesday in remarks to the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities that long-delayed state grants, including one for winter snow removal, would be delivered by Christmas. The administration clarified Wednesday that promise came with a major caveat.

Administration officials said the funding would be released only after legislators adopt a long-term transportation financing plan, something that legislative leaders say is unlikely until a special session in January.

Both the stalled funding and the transportation program rely on dollars the state borrows annually by selling bonds on Wall Street. And Lamont has said frequently he cannot be sure how much Connecticut can borrow for municipal aid, school construction, and other priorities, until it addresses a long-overdue rebuild of its aging highways, bridges and rail lines.

“The governor has always viewed a transportation plan as being inextricably linked to bond authorizations,” said Lamont’s communications director, Max Reiss.

But cities and towns have grown increasingly impatient as a significant portion of their annual aid package from the state — about $150 million based on last fiscal year’s totals — hangs in political limbo.

“I think it’s unfortunate they are playing political games with municipal aid at the Capitol,” said Betsy Gara, executive director of the Connecticut Council of Small Towns. “It makes it almost impossible to plan for the future of our communities if we don’t know when funding will be released.”

Lamont, who’s been trying to convince lawmakers since February to approve tolls to help finance a 10-year transportation infrastructure plan, appeared to settle on trucks-only tolls  last week with his fellow Democrats in the House and Senate majorities.

Betsy Gara, executive director of the Connecticut Council of Small Towns Jacqueline Rabe Thomas /

They outlined a framework that includes tolling commercial trucks, utilizing low-interest federal loans, re-purposing state financing from other priorities into transportation, and possibly tapping excess budget reserves between 2021 and 2024 — provided the economy remains strong.

A special session is possible in December, but only to consider a non-partisan issue: The settlement of litigation over Connecticut’s hospital provider tax.

Legislative leaders say passage of any bill involving tolls would be difficult in a pre-holiday special session, due to scheduling and travel conflicts. No Republican support is expected for any bill that relies on tolls.

Lamont had shared his optimism Tuesday with municipal leaders that the transportation-bonding standoff was nearing a conclusion.

“That means in the next two and a half weeks, we’re going to have a Bond Commission meeting that frees up all the LoCIP and paving money that you need, you can expect and you can count upon, and we’re going to get that done,” the governor said, sparking applause from local leaders at a Connecticut Conference of Municipalities forum at Foxwoods Resorts Casino.

Administration officials even talked of tentative plans to hold a State Bond Commission meeting on Dec. 18. Once the legislature authorizes new borrowing the 10-member commission, which the governor chairs, also must approve the financing before bonds can be sold and funds released to towns.

Besides LoCIP — or the Local Capital Improvement Program — the other two stalled municipal grants paid for with bond dollars are earmarked for property tax relief and road maintenance.

Delays surrounding that last grant — Town Aid Road, or TAR — have been the biggest thorn in municipal officials’ sides. The state usually provides $60 million per year in TAR funds, delivering half in July and half in January. The other two delayed grants typically aren’t distributed until later in the fiscal year.

But communities use the TAR funds for summer road repaving, fall tree-clearing and winter snow removal.

When the first $30 million in TAR funds wasn’t delivered this past summer, some communities scaled back road work, while others borrowed from their winter accounts.

Connecticut Conference of Municipalities Executive Director Joe DeLong

If TAR funds aren’t released soon, local leaders say, those communities that already raided their snow removal budgets will have no choice but to scale back road repairs planned for this spring.

“I think many towns will choose to budget very conservatively,” Gara said. “That means they are going to put off projects that are beneficial to our state and local economy.”

CCM Executive Director Joe DeLong said he thinks most people understood the governor was not pledging unconditional release of delayed local aid in December — regardless of whether a transportation plan is adopted.

But DeLong also agreed that the inconsistent nature of state aid in recent years is taking its own toll on local roads.

“All of this deferred road maintenance actually increases the cost,” he said. “So we’re actually spending more dollars not doing this the right way.”

And this is the second time in three years communities have faced long delays to receive state aid.

A marathon battle between Democratic and Republican legislators and Gov. Dannel P. Malloy in 2017 delayed adoption of a new state budget for more than four months into the new fiscal year.

Keith has spent most of his 31 years as a reporter specializing in state government finances, analyzing such topics as income tax equity, waste in government and the complex funding systems behind Connecticut’s transportation and social services networks. He has been the state finances reporter at CT Mirror since it launched in 2010. Prior to joining CT Mirror Keith was State Capitol bureau chief for The Journal Inquirer of Manchester, a reporter for the Day of New London, and a former contributing writer to The New York Times. Keith is a graduate of and a former journalism instructor at the University of Connecticut.

Mark is the Capitol Bureau Chief and a co-founder of CT Mirror. He is a frequent contributor to WNPR, a former state politics writer for The Hartford Courant and Journal Inquirer, and contributor for The New York Times.

Join the Conversation


  1. The Democrats are pursuing impeachment over a nefarious telephone call about withholding military aid to the Ukraine. Governor Lamont is withholding bond funds for towns which already have legislative approval. He is leveraging these funds against approval of his toll plan. Is this grounds for the removal of the governor? I don’t know but it has a similar feeling.

  2. “…Lamont has said frequently he cannot be sure how much Connecticut can
    borrow for municipal aid, school construction, and other priorities,
    until it addresses a long-overdue rebuild of its aging highways, bridges
    and rail lines.” Nonsense! This is shameful game-playing with municipal budgets. The funding for Town Aid Road, LoCIP and other municipal grants was APPROVED in the State’s budget that took effect on July 1. If the funding can be held hostage, then what was passed and signed by Governor Lamont was not an honest budget. Is that what you want us to believe, Mr. Governor?

  3. We need repubs to stage a large protest. Don’t allow the special secession. Leave the state if you must. They did it Oregon over a climate bill and had it killed. It will work. Make tolls an issue again next year. Put the pressure on. Show the voter you truly care about them

Leave a comment