Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

LaHood: Obama’s rail initiative could benefit New Haven-Springfield line

  • by Deirdre Shesgreen
  • February 9, 2011
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

WASHINGTON–Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said Wednesday that the Obama Administration’s push for a national high-speed rail network could directly benefit a proposed $1 billion line from New Haven to Springfield.

In a briefing with regional reporters, LaHood also reiterated the president’s commitment to pushing for a transportation “infrastructure bank,” an idea long championed by Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-3rd District, and ex-Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn.

But these twin initiatives come as Republicans in the House are moving ahead with deep cuts in transportation spending and when the appetite for new programs is weak at best. Even as LaHood spoke, House GOP leaders began circulating a proposal that would slice $1 billion from high-speed rail for this year and $224 million from Amtrak funding.

The countervailing moves have Connecticut officials uncertain about what to expect from Washington.

“The money we get from the federal government is really our lifeline,” said Connecticut Transportation Commissioner Jeffrey Parker.

He said the state has drawn up its five-year capital plan based on an assumption of level funding from Washington. “If those dollars go down, projects are going to have to fall off the table,” he said.

House Republicans have called for trimming 17 percent, or about $11.6 billion, from the current fiscal year’s appropriations bill that funds transportation and housing programs. The details of how deep those cuts will go into specific programs are just now emerging.

Whatever the specifics, the House GOP plan will would almost certainly “compound Connecticut’s problems” in closing a projected $3.67 billion budget deficit, said Rep. Joe Courtney, D-2nd District. “It’s more misery for the state.”

The House is likely to take up its spending proposal, which will fund government operations from March 4 through the end of this fiscal year, next week. The Senate’s timeline is uncertain. But with Democrats in control of that chamber, the Senate spending bill could be slightly more generous.

LaHood acknowledged the difficult fiscal climate but said the White House would push aggressively for increased spending on transportation projects, even as it proposed cuts in other arenas.

“We’re going to work with Congress to find the revenue,” LaHood said.

LaHood said that Connecticut’s proposed rail line–planned as part of a network that would link Boston, Montreal, Manhattan, Albany and Washington–would be among those eligible for funding under the president’s new initiative.

Vice President Joe Biden outlined the proposal Tuesday, saying the White House’s 2012 budget proposal will request $8 billion for high-speed rail infrastructure spending. The $8 billion will be the first installment of a six-year $53 billion plan to connect 80 percent of Americans via high-speed rail in the coming decades.

LaHood said the New England states have been “leaders” in this mode and that he’d already spoken to Gov. Dannel Malloy about Connecticut’s interest in snagging federal money for high-speed rail.

LaHood and Deputy Director of the National Economic Council Jason Furman, who also participated in Wednesday’s briefing, said the forthcoming budget would also provide more detail about the infrastructure bank proposal.

Congress would have to create such an entity. Proponents, including DeLauro, said the bank would seek to leverage federal funding to attract additional private sector investment for key infrastructure projects. The bank would make loans and grants for top regional or national transportation priorities, as well as for other infrastructure needs, such as water, energy, and broadband projects.

DeLauro and Dodd, who retired earlier this year, have long pushed this idea. But it’s never gained much traction in Congress. And some have suggested that with Dodd now gone, it could be an even tougher sell in the Senate, where the idea has gotten a lukewarm reception in previous years.

But DeLauro said the idea is more salient now than ever, because it could help stretch federal dollars at a time when the federal budget is tight.

“In order to look toward long-term economic growth… an infrastructure bank is critical,” DeLauro said. “In an age where we need to rebuild, you are leveraging public and private dollars.”

DeLauro recently reintroduced her bill to create a “National Infrastructure Development Bank.” She acknowledged she doesn’t have any GOP co-sponsors yet, but said she planned to sit down soon with the top two Republicans on the House transportation panel.

“I think it is a new climate and… this is an idea whose time has come,” she said.

Courtney noted that part of the reason there’s been a years-long deadlock over transportation funding in Washington is because of a shortfall in the highway trust fund. If the infrastructure bank could help generate new revenue to close the gap between the gas tax revenue and transportation needs, he said, “it could be well positioned to get strong support” across the political spectrum.

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Deirdre Shesgreen

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
From UHart faculty: All Hawks deserve our support
by Amanda Freeman, Katharine Owens and Rachel Walker

Last week college sports fans in Connecticut were roiled by some startling news. The University of Hartford has been privately considering a move from NCAA Division I to Division III. Grappling with the financial implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, the University commissioned a “feasibility study” from the consulting company CarrSports. The confidential report concluded that the “current Division I-funding model is not viable and cannot achieve the goal of becoming more self-sustaining.”

Lessons learned: Education is not enough to combat anti-vaccine propaganda
by Kerri M. Raissian and Jody Terranova

The Connecticut House of Representatives just passed legislation to end the religious exemption for the school vaccination requirement ( HB6423).  The Connecticut state Senate must act quickly to do the same.  If passed, Connecticut would require medically able school children to receive vaccines as recommended by the CDC.

Biden ought not overuse the term ‘infrastructure’
by Eric W. Kuhn

President Joe Biden's redefinition of the word "bipartisan" is wise, even necessary. Measures that have majority support among regular folks throughout the country-- say, universal background checks for firearms purchases-- have "bipartisan" support because lots of citizens of both major parties approve: that makes sense.

Please let restaurants and bars recover from the pandemic. Oppose HB 6502
by Robert D’Eliseo and Don Mancini

For the first time in almost a year, we can see a light at the end of the tunnel of the COVID-19 pandemic. But that does not mean we are out of the tunnel yet – and these coming months will be critical for the recovery. That is why this is not the time for the Connecticut General Assembly to push the polystyrene ban (HB 6502) they seem on track toward passing.

Bills to repeal motor vehicle tax and cap property taxes are in political limbo
by Keith M. Phaneuf

The motor vehicle tax bill died in committee but could be revived; Property tax cap passed on party lines.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion From UHart faculty: All Hawks deserve our support
by Amanda Freeman, Katharine Owens and Rachel Walker

Last week college sports fans in Connecticut were roiled by some startling news. The University of Hartford has been privately considering a move from NCAA Division I to Division III. Grappling with the financial implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, the University commissioned a “feasibility study” from the consulting company CarrSports. The confidential report concluded that the “current Division I-funding model is not viable and cannot achieve the goal of becoming more self-sustaining.”

Opinion Lessons learned: Education is not enough to combat anti-vaccine propaganda
by Kerri M. Raissian and Jody Terranova

The Connecticut House of Representatives just passed legislation to end the religious exemption for the school vaccination requirement ( HB6423).  The Connecticut state Senate must act quickly to do the same.  If passed, Connecticut would require medically able school children to receive vaccines as recommended by the CDC.

Opinion Biden ought not overuse the term ‘infrastructure’
by Eric W. Kuhn

President Joe Biden's redefinition of the word "bipartisan" is wise, even necessary. Measures that have majority support among regular folks throughout the country-- say, universal background checks for firearms purchases-- have "bipartisan" support because lots of citizens of both major parties approve: that makes sense.

Opinion Please let restaurants and bars recover from the pandemic. Oppose HB 6502
by Robert D’Eliseo and Don Mancini

For the first time in almost a year, we can see a light at the end of the tunnel of the COVID-19 pandemic. But that does not mean we are out of the tunnel yet – and these coming months will be critical for the recovery. That is why this is not the time for the Connecticut General Assembly to push the polystyrene ban (HB 6502) they seem on track toward passing.

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s […]

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is […]

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO