Gov. Ned Lamont discusses tolls in front of a construction site on I-91 in Hartford
Gov. Ned Lamont discusses tolls in front of a construction site on I-91 in Hartford

Gov. Ned Lamont urged business and labor groups Friday to ratchet up pressure on fearful legislators to vote on his tolls proposal before the session ends on June 5.

The Democratic governor also disclosed he would support a temporary transfer of $100 million per year in bonding from other programs to transportation to accelerate construction work until toll receipts arrive in 2024.

“I have reached out to Republicans and Democrats,” Lamont said during a press conference overlooking ongoing reconstruction of a section of Interstate 91 in Hartford’s South End  near the junction with I-84. “I’ve tried everything I could to get the legislators willing to step up and cast a tough vote. They don’t always like a tough vote.”

The governor said Connecticut has had a long-running and detailed debate about the best way to pay for a rebuild of its transportation infrastructure, and the time for talk is over.

“I’ve tried everything I could to get the legislators willing to step up and cast a tough vote. They don’t always like a tough vote.”

Gov. Ned Lamont

“We have a plan that’s ready to go,” Lamont added. “I’m ready for them to bring that out to the floor. Let’s let that see the light of day and have a vote on it.”

Business and labor leaders stood with the governor Friday to press for an immediate vote on tolls.

Joe McGee, vice president of the Business Council of Fairfield County, called Connecticut’s aging transportation infrastructure “a bigger issue than taxes” as far as impediments to economic growth go. “The status quo has shrunk us into a no-growth strategy.”

Don Shubert, president of the Connecticut Construction Industry Association, said “unless we invest in infrastructure, Connecticut has a very bleak future.”

Joe McGee, vice president of the Business Council of Fairfield County

Nate Brown, a spokesman for the Connecticut Building Trades Council and political director for Local 478 of the International Union of Operating Engineers, said Connecticut’s highways, bridges and rail lines have become “a hindrance for our economic development, public safety and quality of life. … You have our 100 percent support on this (tolling) issue.”

Republicans, who are in the minority in the state House and Senate, are steadfastly opposed to tolls. 

Lamont’s fellow Democrats in both chambers have pressed for more details about the governor’s plan, particularly what extra resources he would dedicate to transportation between now and when toll receipts might arrive.

Connecticut currently borrows $700 million to $800 million per year for capital work, which is combined with about $750 million in matching federal grants.

DOT Commissioner Joe Giulietti recently told lawmakers he needs at least $2 billion to make a difference — and then that annual number would need to grow throughout the 2020s and 30s.

DOT officials also told a key legislative panel last month that Connecticut is barely treading water with its current capital spending of $1.4 billion to $1.5 billion per year. In other words, the average condition of roads, bridges and rail lines is being maintained roughly the same.

Tolls would raise $800 million per year by 2024 or 2025. But Lamont had been criticized for proposing no additional sources to cover the interim.

The governor said Friday he would be willing to transfer $100 million per year away from other borrowing programs to support transportation. Connecticut also borrows funds for school construction, state building maintenance, clean water projects, open space and farmland preservation, and economic development initiatives.

That’s less than the $250 million annual transfer that legislators from both parties endorsed in 2017 to keep the transportation capital program afloat until a long-term funding plan could be resolved.

“Unfortunately, that $100 million is nowhere near what Connecticut needs to improve infrastructure today,” Senate Minority Leader Len Fasano, R-North Haven, said Friday. “What the governor appears to be proposing still leaves a massive problem in the short term, that makes our long term challenges even more difficult to address.”

“I view it as an act of desperation, not an act of compromise,” said Deputy House Minority Leader Vincent J. Candelora, R-North Branford. 

The Republican alternative, “Prioritize Progress” would dramatically redirect borrowing resources for transportation.

The GOP plan would combine $700 million in annual borrowing repaid out of the General Fun with the $700 million-to-$800 million it’s already borrowing and paying off out of the Special Transportation Fund. Added to that is $750 million per year in federal grants.

It would have more than $2.1 billion each year to spend on transportation projects — without tolls.

But Lamont said Connecticut would rack up a huge amount of debt under this plan, and could avoid a lot of it by paying cash for some projects with toll receipts. In addition, as much as 40 percent of toll receipts would come from out-of-state motorists, he said.

Senate President Pro Tem Martin M. Looney, D-New Haven, disagreed with Lamont about the tolls bill’s readiness.

“There is not sufficient detail on many parts of the bill,” Looney said. Legislators still have concerns about whether there will be enough funding for transportation construction before toll receipts arrive five years from now, the senator said. They also want more information on the toll rate discounts that would be offered to Connecticut residents and frequent travelers, as well as on any additional funding the governor would support for bus transit services which are crucial to assist working poor families, he said.

House Speaker Joe Aresimowicz, D-Berlin, praised Lamont’s willingness to compromise, but didn’t comment on the governor’s charge that lawmakers are afraid to vote on the tolls issue.

“I applaud Governor Lamont for taking steps to incorporate Republican ideas and commit general bonding funds to our transportation system in an effort to find common ground on tolls legislation,” Aresimowicz said. “I have said all along that it isn’t simply about whether someone is for tolls or against them. It is about creating the most sustainable plan that is fairest to taxpayers, to fix our aging and outdated transportation infrastructure.”

Also Friday, the governor deflected, but did not refute, a recent report in the Hartford Courant that he privately had offered to scale back his tolling plan to exclude the Merritt Parkway to attract more support among legislators.

“Right now our plan is very clear,” the governor said, indicating he wants no more than 50 electronic tolling gantries in total spread along key points on Interstates 84, 91 and 95 as well as the Merritt Parkway.

Avatar photo

Keith M. PhaneufState Budget Reporter

Keith has spent most of his 31 years as a reporter specializing in state government finances, analyzing such topics as income tax equity, waste in government and the complex funding systems behind Connecticut’s transportation and social services networks. He has been the state finances reporter at CT Mirror since it launched in 2010. Prior to joining CT Mirror Keith was State Capitol bureau chief for The Journal Inquirer of Manchester, a reporter for the Day of New London, and a former contributing writer to The New York Times. Keith is a graduate of and a former journalism instructor at the University of Connecticut.

Join the Conversation


  1. The I-91 North to I-84 East across the Charter Oak bridge was a clearly inadequate design from the beginning when the Charter Oak bridge was rebuilt.

    You had a major NYC to Boston corridor – I-95 North -> I-91 North -> I-84 East, heavily traveled as anyone from CT would recognize. So what does the CT DOT design? A 2-lane ramp from CT 15 North to I-84 East (very little out-of-state traffic) and a ONE-lane ramp from I-91 North to I-84 East.

    Stupid design from the get-go and now we taxpayers get to foot the bill for the DOT’s poor decision.

    Gotta love CT bureaucrats.

  2. Give up this nonsense and go back to the bipartisan 250m transfer payments you deep sixed. Tolls hurt the poor and the working class along with the commuters. Your plan is half baked, lacking detail, and will likely never be approved as described by the Federal Govt.

  3. The people who run the government in Hartford never have enough money so you can be sure that tolls will be implemented no matter what the effect on the poor and the working class who it hurts the most. Just another pot of money to keep the public employees happy.

  4. The Governor needs to get the Connecticut driving public to back his plan, Offering a discount from some unknown number, in my view, is not the way to go. I might suggest that the Governor consider offering each registered Connecticut vehicle linked to “easy pass” a hard numbered discount they can wrap their check book around. Offering each registered vehicle $300 a year credit to their “easy pass”
    account is a good place to start. With that the toll pricing would be the same for all who use it. No fancy mathematics for the Connecticut “easy pass” driver to worry about or others to try to manage.

  5. When will Lamont ratchet up the pressure to reduce the tax burden in this disastrous economy? When will people rise up against this barrage of tax increases? When will reason prevail?

Leave a comment