Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

State, hospitals, still trying to reach legal settlement

  • Health
  • by Keith M. Phaneuf
  • October 28, 2019
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

Arielle Levin Becker :: CTMirror.org

Backus Hospital in Norwich

When Gov. Ned Lamont and Connecticut’s hospital industry announced a tentative deal in late May to resolve a longstanding lawsuit, they estimated the deal would be ratified by September.

Now, nearly two months past the target date, details are still being hammered out, with both sides saying little except they remain on track for a resolution.

“Negotiations based on the tentative deal we reached with the hospitals are ongoing and we hope to have the matter resolved soon,” said Chris McClure, spokesman for the governor’s budget office.

The Connecticut Hospital Association’s statement was equally opaque.

“We have been in discussions with the state, with a mutual goal of resolving this matter soon,” CHA said Friday.

But there are several reasons why the deal would be very complex and perhaps take longer than expected.

There’s big money at stake.

Since the 2011 General Assembly and then-Gov. Dannel P. Malloy established the hospital provider tax, the industry has pumped hundreds of millions of dollars annually into Connecticut’s coffers.

With the exception of one year, the state has returned some — but not all — of those funds, redistributing them through various methodologies. This back-and-forth system was supposed to be a tool to qualify for and leverage more federal Medicaid dollars, but quickly evolved into a hefty tax on the hospital industry.

Hospitals filed suit in 2015, charging Connecticut abused this process. Industry officials have said hospitals have been short-changed by billions, and one estimate places the damage at roughly $4 billion.

Though neither side has disclosed many details, Connecticut is expected to settle for about 40%  of that amount, to be paid out over seven years.

And that leads to the second reason why a final agreement hasn’t been ratified yet. ….

Connecticut doesn’t plan to foot the bill by itself.

The settlement is expected to continue the provider tax as well as the corresponding supplemental payments back to hospitals. And it’s through those payments that Connecticut will make up for its past fiscal sins.

And since those payments to hospitals generally qualify Connecticut for Medicaid reimbursements, the federal government would be covering roughly half of the settlement cost.

That means the deal must pass muster with the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services.

And federal approval isn’t the only complication that stems from using Medicaid dollars to resolve any settlement.

Connecticut can’t assume Washington won’t tamper with Medicaid.

mark pazniokas :: ctmirror.org

Gov. Ned Lamont

More specifically, the state must build contingency language into the agreement to guard against any radical changes to Medicaid.

What happens if a Supreme Court ruling were to radically alter the Affordable Care Act?

What if a recession coupled with federal budget woes leads Congress to curtail Medicaid funding for states?

If Connecticut is counting on hundreds of millions of federal dollars over the coming years to help settle the lawsuit, the state and the industry must agree on what will happen if some of those dollars don’t materialize.

But state officials aren’t the only ones who need contingency plans. The final reason a final settlement is delayed is …

Hospitals haven’t forgotten the state’s history of flipping the script.

Keith M. Phaneuf :: CTMirror.org file photo

Connecticut Hospital Association CEO Jennifer Jackson (file photo)

Just as Connecticut must have fiscal and legal safeguards in place, so too the hospitals.

Industry officials recall the hospital levy initially was pitched as a tax in name only.

Under that original agreement, the industry would pay $350 million per year to the state, which would redistribute and return every penny back to hospitals — plus $50 million more.

Connecticut could afford to do that because of the additional federal Medicaid funds it received.

But things began eroding almost immediately. As state government struggled with budget deficits over the next six years, the tax grew while the payments back to the industry shrank — despite an increase in the federal reimbursement rate.

By 2017, hospitals were paying $514 million to the state and getting a collective $78 million in return. And last year, under a new agreement, they paid $900 million and received back about $670 million.

Industry officials also complained earlier this year that between October 2018 and May 2019, hospitals were short-changed more than $230 million for care provided to Medicaid patients and to the under-insured.

The final settlement with the state is expected to contain provisions to ensure Connecticut politicians cannot fiscally undermine this deal in the future.

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Keith M. Phaneuf A winner of numerous journalism awards, Keith Phaneuf has been CT Mirror’s state finances reporter since it launched in 2010. The former State Capitol bureau chief for The Journal Inquirer of Manchester, Keith has spent most of 31 years as a reporter specializing in state government finances, analyzing such topics as income tax equity, waste in government and the complex funding systems behind Connecticut’s transportation and social services networks. A former contributing writer to The New York Times, Keith is a graduate of and a former journalism instructor at the University of Connecticut.

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Connecticut House joins national civil rights campaign over Black hair styles
by Mark Pazniokas

The Connecticut House voted for a bill intended to protect Black women from discrimination over their hair.

CT legislature poised to make early budget pledge to help cities and towns
by Keith M. Phaneuf

The state House is expected to approve more than $100 million in new, annual PILOT grants to municipalities.

Grocery store workers ‘disgusted’ with Lamont’s new COVID-19 vaccine policy
by Keith M. Phaneuf

Grocery store workers are frustrated with Gov. Ned Lamont, who is no longer prioritizing them in the coronavirus vaccination schedule.

Connecticut GOP picks Susan Hatfield as state chair
by Mark Pazniokas

Susan Hatfield, vice chair of the Connecticut Republican Party, will complete the term of the former chair, J.R. Romano.

Senator alleges voter fraud, but no complaint was filed
by Mark Pazniokas

Rob Sampson said a voter in his district was told an absentee ballot already had been cast in her name.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion The historical basis of zoning begs for reform
by Lawrence Rizzolo

Discussions of race are fraught with emotion. Witness the zoning reforms being discussed in our legislature. I will attempt to advance a dispassionate argument that is based on government-sponsored racism that occurred during my lifetime and led to the structural problems that persist today.

Opinion Lamont must stop waffling on the Killingly power plant issue
by Tennyson Benedict

On January 19, Gov. Ned Lamont gave his bluntest comments yet regarding the controversial Killingly natural gas plant, saying, “I don’t want to build Killingly.”  Yet, Lamont still refuses to wield his executive authority to actually stop its construction, and instead offers vague suggestions that market forces will stop the plant’s construction.

Opinion Religious freedom is less than righteousness
by Spencer Hill

The CT Viewpoints opinion “Religious freedom is more than religion” shows just how entrenched is the sincerely held belief that one man’s notion of “freedom” dictates the liberty of others.

Opinion To boost economy, state should invest in the ‘last mile’ of broadband connectivity
by Thomas J. Peters, Ph.D

In his budget address on February 10,   Gov. Ned Lamont announced his intent to expand broadband connectivity in Connecticut, an effort to be lauded. Connecticut enjoys a significant competitive advantage for economic development in the Connecticut Education Network (CEN), “ a 2,500 route mile, all optical, high-performance internet network.”

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO