Free Daily Headlines :

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine Info
  • Money
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Justice
  • More
    • Environment
    • Economic Development
    • Gaming
    • Investigations
    • Social Services
    • TRANSPORTATION
  • Opinion
    • CT Viewpoints
    • CT Artpoints
DONATE
Reflecting Connecticut’s Reality.
    COVID-19
    Vaccine Info
    Money
    Politics
    Education
    Health
    Justice
    More
    Environment
    Economic Development
    Gaming
    Investigations
    Social Services
    TRANSPORTATION
    Opinion
    CT Viewpoints
    CT Artpoints

LET�S GET SOCIAL

Show your love for great stories and out standing journalism

State can’t rely on raising hospital taxes to survive next recession

  • Money
  • by Keith M. Phaneuf
  • January 3, 2020
  • View as "Clean Read" "Exit Clean Read"

Bridgeport Hospital is one of 27 acute care hospitals in Connecticut.

State officials knew settling a multi-billion-dollar lawsuit filed by Connecticut’s hospital industry posed risks.

That’s why Gov. Ned Lamont built emergency provisions allowing state government to back out of the deal if federal Medicaid funding — which will pay for more than half of the settlement — is dramatically reduced in future years.

But shifting fiscal winds from Washington, D.C., aren’t the only risk Connecticut faces.

For good or ill, state officials relied on aggressive increases in hospital taxes to keep Connecticut’s finances in balance during an extremely sluggish recovery from the last recession. Between 2013 and this year, hospitals pumped more than $1 billion into the state’s coffers, funds that otherwise might be raised by income tax hikes, municipal aid reductions, program cuts or all of the above.

But under this settlement, the state pledges to keep hospital taxes flat through 2026 — even though history suggests Connecticut and the nation are overdue for another economic downturn.

That means if another recession arrives in the new year or soon thereafter, Connecticut won’t have the hospitals to bail them out.

Even critics of the tax, who argue the hospital tax hikes of the past decade were a mistake that hurt the state in the long run, acknowledge that lawmakers and Lamont will face some very tough choices during the next downturn.

“That’s the part that’s starting to scare me,” said Rep. Toni E. Walker, D-New Haven, longtime co-chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee.

“If we can’t get any more revenue somewhere else, then we have to cut, and this is going to become a war.”

State Rep. Toni Walker

Walker, who supported the hospital lawsuit settlement, said it was a mistake for state government to lean so heavily on the industry during the last recovery. But she also said Connecticut’s social services safety net and its municipal aid program have gotten significantly leaner over the past decade and shouldn’t be targeted for more cuts when the next recession comes.

“If we can’t get any more revenue somewhere else, then we have to cut,” Walker said, “and this is going to become a war.”

Lawmakers and Gov. Dannel P. Malloy created the hospital levy in 2011 as a tax in name only. The industry paid $350 million to the state, which responded by redistributing all of those funds, plus another $50 million, back to hospitals.

Connecticut didn’t lose out because these supplemental payments helped the state to leverage hundreds of millions of dollars annually in federal Medicaid reimbursements — a back-and-forth arrangement encouraged by Washington and employed by most states.

But as Connecticut’s recovery from the last recession plodded along far slower than officials anticipated, Malloy and lawmakers gradually increased the tax, scaled back the supplemental payments — and forfeited huge federal dollars in the process.

Hospitals, who paid a total of nearly $2 billion more than they received between 2013 and 2019 collectively, sued four years ago on grounds that this system abused the process allowed under Medicaid.

“Most people accepted this settlement was the right thing to do because of the fear of the possible outcome — that a court could say you have to refund all of this money,” said Sen. John Fonfara, D-Hartford, co-chair of the tax-writing Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee.

“Most people accepted this settlement was the right thing to do because of the fear of the possible outcome — that a court could say you have to refund all of this money.”

Sen. John Fonfara

Facing an industry claiming roughly $4 billion in damages, Connecticut agreed to pay $1.8 billion to hospitals over the next seven years — with just over half being covered by federal Medicaid reimbursement payments.

And while that deal also came with a pledge to modestly trim hospital tax rates — and avoid any hikes — through 2026, lawmakers were happy to remove a multi-billion-dollar risk. “I think that was enough, alone, for most people” to back the deal, Fonfara said.

“But the discipline part, cleaning up our finances, I don’t know if people are realizing we’re going to have to bite the bullet,” he added.

The war and bullet-biting Fonfara and Walker fear is possible despite overwhelming bipartisan support for the settlement, largely because there’s little-to-no agreement on what Connecticut can tap as an alternative cash cow.

mark Pazniokas :: ctmirror.org

Hospital executives faced the legislature during a hearing on the tax lawsuit settlement. From left to right, Jennifer Jackson, CEO, CHA; Stephen Frayne, Senior Vice President, CHA ; Dr. John Murphy, CEO, Nuvance Health; Marna Borgstrom, CEO, Yale New Haven Health; David Whitehead, Executive VP, Hartford HealthCare; and Patrick Charmel, President and CEO, Griffin Hospital.

Many of Walker’s fellow Democrats in the House and Senate majorities are wary of further cuts in spending on social services and local aid.

If there’s no other acceptable alternative, progressive Democrats say the answer should center on raising income taxes on Connecticut’s wealthiest residents. Though the state’s largest revenue engine is fairly progressive at the lower end — households earning less than $35,000 per year usually have no tax liability — that progressiveness flattens out quickly.

Many middle-class and rich households all pay an effective tax rate that ranges between 5% and 6.5 %. [The highest earners, singles making more than $500,000 per year and couples topping $1 million, pay 6.99%.]

But Lamont, a wealthy Greenwich businessman, and the growing number of Democratic legislators from Fairfield County, have staunchly opposed income tax hikes aimed exclusively at the rich. The administration fought hard this past session to kill a proposal for an income tax surcharge on investment-related earnings of Connecticut’s wealthiest households.

Combine that with traditional Republican legislative opposition to tax hikes of any kind, and there’s no easy consensus on what might replace hospitals as Connecticut’s budget cure-all.

“I viewed the hospital tax as more of a gimmick than a systemic change,” said Deputy House Minority Leader Vincent J. Candelora, R-North Branford, a veteran of the finance committee and another advocate of the lawsuit settlement.

The “systemic change” Candelora and many of his fellow Republican lawmakers favor involve significant reductions in state employee benefits.

“I viewed the hospital tax as more of a gimmick than a systemic change. We have to start making tougher decisions.”

Deputy House Minority Leader Vincent Candelora

But those are locked in by contract through mid-2027 and state employee unions, which granted concessions in 2009, 2011 and 2017, say they’re done until lawmakers are ready to ask the rich to pay more taxes.

GOP leaders counter by saying lawmakers could still vote to scale back, or even eliminate, certain retirement benefits effective mid-2027 — and enjoy some budgetary savings now. Because benefit obligations would be less in the future, they argue, Connecticut could scale back its payments now into those programs.

The unions, Lamont, and many Democrats in the legislature, have countered that this approach violates collective bargaining rules and wouldn’t survive a court challenge. 

“I think that’s always been the elephant in the room,” Candelora said. “Democrats and the unions are there at all costs to protect each other. We have to start making tougher decisions.”

Lamont, and others, are hoping it won’t come to that.

The economy has slowed somewhat, but 2019 closed without a national recession.

More importantly, Connecticut currently has a record-setting $2.5 billion in its emergency reserve, and the rainy day fund could clear $2.8 billion by the end of next summer.

This would leave the state with a fiscal cushion approaching 15% of annual spending — the maximum allowed by law.

Still, that’s no guarantee that Connecticut won’t have to cut spending and/or raise taxes in the next downturn.

Keith M. Phaneuf :: CTMirror.org

Hospital executives like Bristol Hospital President Kurt Barwis lobbied lawmakers for years to abide by the original agreement for the tax. Here, Barwis speaks to reporters at a press conference organized by CHA in 2017.

During the last recession — between 2008 and 2010 — annual tax receipts in the General Fund fell from $12.5 billion to $10.9 billion.

A downturn like the last one, followed by a similarly sluggish recovery, easily could consume all of the state’s reserves and still leave Connecticut’s finances in the red.

Despite this, some say Connecticut’s path forward out of any recession involves strengthening its hospital industry, not weakening it.

Both Lamont and Connecticut Hospital Association CEO Jennifer Jackson hailed the deal as an economic step forward.

“Prolonging litigation in court would benefit nobody, and certainly not the residents of our state,” Lamont said. “Going forward, it is my hope that this partnership will put us on a new path in which we can work with our hospitals and partner in a way that benefits the quality of care for our state’s residents while simultaneously addressing the cost of that care.”

“Today marks the start of a new partnership with the state that will strengthen health care in Connecticut for the benefit of everyone who lives here,” Jackson said.

University of Connecticut economist Fred Carstensen, who was commissioned by the CHA in 2015 to analyze the provider tax, concluded it not only weakened the economy, but cost the state more than it raised.

“The state probably lost $2 billion in other tax revenue because of the negative feedback,” Carstensen said.

Hospitals, which are some of the state’s largest employers, trimmed staff and put off investing in new equipment and specialized treatment programs. Support businesses, such as medical and equipment suppliers, also were harmed.

“All of those people were not paying income tax, were not paying sales tax,” he said.

Legislators and Malloy also failed to understand the concept of medical tourism — that many people travel to other states for better access to health care, particularly specialized services. 

And as patients go, doctors, nurses and medical suppliers follow, Carstensen said.

“It’s a compound thing, keeping your folks in Connecticut to get their medical services and attracting more people from out of state to come,” he said, adding that Connecticut’s health care industry lost significant ground to the Boston and New York metro markets over the past decade.

The Malloy administration repeatedly defended the escalating hospital tax, noting the industry still paid its top executives robust salaries.

More importantly, the Malloy administration argued, the expansion of health care access brought about by the federal Affordable Care Act channeled a huge swath of new patients — and business — into hospitals.

The industry countered by saying this growth chiefly came from Medicaid patients whose care cost hospitals more than government payments could cover.

But while hospitals were forced to adjust over the past decade, Fonfara said, it will be state government’s turn to make even harder choices in the years to come.

And though there’s no consensus on what to do if or when the reserves run dry, the Hartford lawmaker said he’s optimistic legislators will turn to a more sustainable solution the next time one is needed.

“I think we’ve learned the hard way when we’re not disciplined how much it hurts us,” he said. “That’s what people are fed up with.”

Sign up for CT Mirror's free daily news summary.

Free to Read. Not Free to Produce.

The Connecticut Mirror is a nonprofit newsroom. 90% of our revenue comes from people like you. If you value our reporting please consider making a donation. You'll enjoy reading CT Mirror even more knowing you helped make it happen.

YES, I'LL DONATE TODAY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Keith M. Phaneuf A winner of numerous journalism awards, Keith Phaneuf has been CT Mirror’s state finances reporter since it launched in 2010. The former State Capitol bureau chief for The Journal Inquirer of Manchester, Keith has spent most of 31 years as a reporter specializing in state government finances, analyzing such topics as income tax equity, waste in government and the complex funding systems behind Connecticut’s transportation and social services networks. A former contributing writer to The New York Times, Keith is a graduate of and a former journalism instructor at the University of Connecticut.

SEE WHAT READERS SAID

RELATED STORIES
Connecticut House joins national civil rights campaign over Black hair styles
by Mark Pazniokas

The Connecticut House voted for a bill intended to protect Black women from discrimination over their hair.

House approves big municipal aid pledge, tax incentive bills
by Keith M. Phaneuf and Mark Pazniokas

The House approved bills Wednesday pledging $100 million-plus in new municipal aid and offering tax incentives to attract data centers.

CT legislature poised to make early budget pledge to help cities and towns
by Keith M. Phaneuf

The state House is expected to approve more than $100 million in new, annual PILOT grants to municipalities.

Grocery store workers ‘disgusted’ with Lamont’s new COVID-19 vaccine policy
by Keith M. Phaneuf

Grocery store workers are frustrated with Gov. Ned Lamont, who is no longer prioritizing them in the coronavirus vaccination schedule.

Connecticut GOP picks Susan Hatfield as state chair
by Mark Pazniokas

Susan Hatfield, vice chair of the Connecticut Republican Party, will complete the term of the former chair, J.R. Romano.

Support Our Work

Show your love for great stories and outstanding journalism.

$
Select One
  • Monthly
  • Yearly
  • Once
Artpoint painter
CT ViewpointsCT Artpoints
Opinion The historical basis of zoning begs for reform
by Lawrence Rizzolo

Discussions of race are fraught with emotion. Witness the zoning reforms being discussed in our legislature. I will attempt to advance a dispassionate argument that is based on government-sponsored racism that occurred during my lifetime and led to the structural problems that persist today.

Opinion Lamont must stop waffling on the Killingly power plant issue
by Tennyson Benedict

On January 19, Gov. Ned Lamont gave his bluntest comments yet regarding the controversial Killingly natural gas plant, saying, “I don’t want to build Killingly.”  Yet, Lamont still refuses to wield his executive authority to actually stop its construction, and instead offers vague suggestions that market forces will stop the plant’s construction.

Opinion Religious freedom is less than righteousness
by Spencer Hill

The CT Viewpoints opinion “Religious freedom is more than religion” shows just how entrenched is the sincerely held belief that one man’s notion of “freedom” dictates the liberty of others.

Opinion To boost economy, state should invest in the ‘last mile’ of broadband connectivity
by Thomas J. Peters, Ph.D

In his budget address on February 10,   Gov. Ned Lamont announced his intent to expand broadband connectivity in Connecticut, an effort to be lauded. Connecticut enjoys a significant competitive advantage for economic development in the Connecticut Education Network (CEN), “ a 2,500 route mile, all optical, high-performance internet network.”

Artwork Grand guidance
by Anne:Gogh

In a world of systemic oppression aimed towards those of darker skintones – representation matters. We are more than our equity elusive environments, more than numbers in a prison and much more than victims of societal dispositions. This piece depicts a melanated young man draped in a cape ascending high above multiple forms of oppression. […]

Artwork Shea
by Anthony Valentine

Shea is a story about race and social inequalities that plague America. It is a narrative that prompts the question, “Do you know what it’s like to wake up in new skin?”

Artwork The Declaration of Human Rights
by Andres Chaparro

Through my artwork I strive to create an example of ideas that reflect my desire to raise social consciousness, and cultural awareness. Jazz music is the catalyst to all my work, and plays a major influence in each piece of work.”

Artwork ‘A thing of beauty. Destroy it forever’
by Richard DiCarlo | Derby

During times like these it’s often fun to revisit something familiar and approach things with a different slant. I have been taking some Pop culture and Art masterpieces and applying the vintage 1960’s and 70’s classic figures (Fisher Price, little people) to the make an amusing pieces. Here is my homage to Fisher -Price, Yellow […]

Twitter Feed
A Twitter List by CTMirror

Engage

  • Reflections Tickets & Sponsorships
  • Events
  • Donate
  • Newsletter Sign-Up
  • Submit to Viewpoints
  • Submit to ArtPoints
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Commenting Guidelines
  • Legal Notices
  • Contact Us

About

  • About CT Mirror
  • Announcements
  • Board
  • Staff
  • Sponsors and Funders
  • Donors
  • Friends of CT Mirror
  • History
  • Financial
  • Policies
  • Strategic Plan

Opportunity

  • Advertising and Sponsorship
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Use of Photography
  • Work for Us

Go Deeper

  • Steady Habits Podcast
  • Economic Indicator Dashboard
  • Five Things

The Connecticut News Project, Inc. 1049 Asylum Avenue, Hartford, CT 06105. Phone: 860-218-6380

© Copyright 2021, The Connecticut News Project. All Rights Reserved. Website by Web Publisher PRO