Opponents of tolls were vocal in recent years. mark Pazniokas / ctmirror.org
Opponents and supporters of truck tolls arrive at Legislative Office Building for a public hearing Friday. Hundreds of people signed up to testify at the hearing. Elizabeth Hamilton / ctmirror.org

Senate and House Democratic leaders said Friday afternoon the General Assembly will vote on a tractor-trailer  tolls bill the week of Feb. 10, though they have not resolved a small detail that loomed large Thursday night when they cancelled a special session slated for next week: Which chamber will vote first?

“That remains to be determined,” said Senate President Pro Tem Martin M. Looney of New Haven.

Looney and House Majority Leader Matt Ritter of Hartford told reporters outside the governor’s office in the State Capitol they had just assured Gov. Ned Lamont that his signature first-year issue is back on track, while hundreds of opponents and supporters lined up in the Legislative Office Building to testify on the bill at a public hearing.

The annual 2020 legislative session opens Wednesday, and a vote on the transportation financing bill so early in the session would require Looney and House Speaker Joe Aresimowicz of Berlin to deem it an emergency-certified bill, a status that exempts the measure from further review by legislative committees or another public hearing.

“Sometimes there’s distrust issues between the House and Senate.”

House Majority Leader Matt Ritter

House Minority Leader Themis Klarides, R-Derby, and Senate Minority Leader Len Fasano, R-North Haven, said the Democrats are intent on finding a process that minimizes public vetting of the legislation before a full traffic and fiscal analysis can be completed.

“This is beyond irresponsible,” Fasano said. “How dare you?”

Looney and Ritter said they had votes for passage, and both tried to minimize the obvious question raised by the inability to quickly determine where the bill would come to its first floor vote: The obvious distrust between the chambers, each controlled by Democrats.

Asked if he trusted Ritter and House Speaker Joe Aresimowicz of Berlin, Looney said, “I do.”

Rep. Matt Ritter and Sen. Martin Looney said tolls are back on track. mark pazniokas / ctmirror.org

Ritter, who stood next to Looney outside the governor’s office after a half-hour meeting, said the issue is less with leadership than some rank-and-file members. “Sometimes,” Ritter said, “there’s distrust issues between the House and Senate.”

“I think it’s just there are elements of both caucuses who want  their votes to be final action,” Looney said.

Lamont shook off the previous night’s cancellation, saying his fellow Democrats assured him they had sufficient votes, and the only challenge was to find a day when every lawmaker supporting the measure would be available. Democrats have solid majorities of 22-14 in the Senate and 91-60 in the House, but every Republican is opposed.

Democrats can survive the loss of four Democratic votes in the Senate and achieve an 18-18 tie that would be broken by Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz. In the House, they need to keep 76 of their 91 members on board.

“I feel as confident today as I did yesterday, as I did the day before that,” Lamont said. “I just met with the leaders and had a good discussion about scheduling, when we can do this.”

The bill, which is available on line, would authorize the state to charge tolls on tractor trailers at 12 highway bridges.

Tolls would be charged on trucks in Class 8 through 13. The classes shaded in gray would not be tolled. CT DOT

The opening hours of the hearing Friday were consumed by questioning of the governor’s top fiscal official, Secretary Melissa McCaw of the Office of Policy and Management, and the state transportation commissioner, Joseph J. Giulietti

Administration officials warned that if lawmakers fail to find new revenues for infrastructure before the next recession — or before the transportation program falls into deficit in five years — Connecticut’s economy stands to lose tens of billions of dollars.

“The Special Transportation Fund is in crisis,” McCaw told the legislature’s Transportation Committee at Friday’s hearing. “It needs a suitable, reliable revenue stream. The current situation is untenable.”

The fund is financed by fuel taxes and various fees, and it pays for debt service on transportation bonding and the operating costs of the Department of Transportation and Department of Motor Vehicles. Between state borrowing and matching federal grants, Connecticut spends about $1.6 billion per year on highway, bridge and rail repairs.

The $19.1 billion investment Lamont is supporting for the coming decade “will be transformative for our economy,” Giulietti testified.

About $172 million in annual toll receipts, coupled with additional sales tax revenues dedicated to transportation, would prop up the Special Transportation Fund.

“The current situation is untenable.”

OPM Secretary Melissa McCaw

The plan crafted by Lamont and Democratic legislators  would take advantage of low-interest federal financing, with interest rates close to 2%, to minimize borrowing costs over the coming decade.

“These are very, very aggressive rates,” Giulietti said. “The best we’ve ever seen.”

Economic studies have shown Connecticut’s congested highways and rail lines cost businesses and residents a collective $4.2 billion to $5 billion annually in delays and other complications, McCaw said, adding it’s a price the state has been paying for years.

The Metro-North commuter rail system has slower running times than 50 years ago, said Giulietti, the former president of Metro-North.

McCaw warned that if the lawmakers do not act now, the prospects of modernizing transportation infrastructure would be vulnerable to an economic downturn. A delay of five or six years could cost the economy as much as $30 billion, McCaw said. And for those who believe the next economic crisis is many years away, McCaw said, the current Special Transportation Fund still won’t be sufficient to address future needs.

The STF’s longtime revenue sources — fuel tax revenues and various motor vehicle fees — are growing at less than 3% per year while transportation costs are growing by 4%, McCaw said. If toll receipts or some other revenues aren’t added to transportation, the STF would fall into deficit by 2025, she said.

“Major bridge work” is needed at all 12 of the highway structures where toll gantries would be located under the plan, Giulietti said. The tolls would go into effect in 2023.

“It may be trucks today, but we all know it will be cars tomorrow. Sadly, the trust is broken and we have had enough.”

Patrick Sasser
Founder of No Tolls CT

Republican legislative leaders pushed back Friday against the Democratic governor’s plan, calling it a first step to a broader tolls plan, though that would require the passage of a second transportation bill, most likely after 2023 and requiring a legislative consensus that now seems unfathomable.

“It may be trucks today, but we all know it will be cars tomorrow,” said Patrick Sasser, founder of No Tolls CT, who said the need for tolls is decades of fiscal mismanagement of state finances. “Sadly, the trust is broken and we have had enough.”

Patrick Sasser, center, a No Tolls leader, was featured at press conference with GOP lawmakers mark Pazniokas / ctmirror.org

Democrats have tried to underline that passenger tolls are permanently off the table by proposing bond language barring them.

But Klarides said such language would be worthless: Wall Street never would try to enforce them, since investors in bonds want only one thing: “They want to be paid.”

Rep. Laura Devlin, R-Fairfield, noted that the 2007 legislature approved about $2 billion in bonding to shore up the teachers’ pension fund, pledging in that bond covenant not to alter the schedule of contributions to the pension system until those bonds were paid off, around 2032.

The language was not binding, she said. 

Last May, lawmakers approved a proposal from Lamont and state Treasurer Shawn Wooden to restructure pension payments. 

The governor and treasurer asserted this would not violate the bond covenant as long as Connecticut set aside an amount equal to the maximum yearly debt payment on the bonds, about $380 million. Connecticut, which had $1.2 billion in its rainy day fund last May — and was on its way to amassing $2.5 billion by September 30 — had no problem fulfilling that $380 million reserve requirement.

“Trust and transparency, honestly, those are two of the biggest issues that are causing angst and problems within the general public.”

Rep. Laura Devlin, R-Fairfield

The Lamont administration projects that at least 50% of the truck tolls receipts would be paid by out-of-state truck drivers, a factor that Hartford Mayor Luke Bronin said should be persuasive.

“It’s like going to the store, seeing a 50% discount, and saying, ‘No, I would rather pay full price,” Bronin said. “The bottom line is we have to make investments now. They have to be big. It is our only chance to be competitive.”

But Kurt Lindeland, who runs Connecticut Mulch Distributors in Enfield, said plenty of Connecticut companies will pay a high price, his among them. His company owns 38 trucks and makes 11,000 trips annually in the state.

“We’re estimating $400,000 to $700,000,” Lindeland said of his projected cost, “And that’s a pretty scary number.”

The administration tried to minimize the impact on Connecticut businesses by exempting all classes of trucks other than tractor trailers, and no truck would be charged more than once a day at any one gantry.

Unions turned out members to support a transportation financing plan that they say will produce jobs in a depressed construction industry. American Trucking Associations filed written testimony reminding lawmakers that trucks-only tolls in Rhode Island are facing a legal challenge by their industry.

Avatar photo

Mark PazniokasCapitol Bureau Chief

Mark is the Capitol Bureau Chief and a co-founder of CT Mirror. He is a frequent contributor to WNPR, a former state politics writer for The Hartford Courant and Journal Inquirer, and contributor for The New York Times.

Avatar photo

Keith M. PhaneufState Budget Reporter

Keith has spent most of his 31 years as a reporter specializing in state government finances, analyzing such topics as income tax equity, waste in government and the complex funding systems behind Connecticut’s transportation and social services networks. He has been the state finances reporter at CT Mirror since it launched in 2010. Prior to joining CT Mirror Keith was State Capitol bureau chief for The Journal Inquirer of Manchester, a reporter for the Day of New London, and a former contributing writer to The New York Times. Keith is a graduate of and a former journalism instructor at the University of Connecticut.

Join the Conversation

19 Comments

  1. Unless and until Looney and Aresimowicz get voted out of office, nothing is going to change. All the anti-toll signatures and activisim is meaningless in a one party state.

  2. Why are all the new Amazon delivery vans registered in Massachusetts? Shouldn’t our local municipalities and state get the motor vehicle taxes? If we don’t even do that, why should tolls be considered? Wake up!

    1. Ask yourself why the previous governor threw massive amounts of state debt at Amazon to put warehouses in North Haven and Windsor. They would have opened,regardless and the amounts of corporate welfare were many times higher than surrounding states,as usual.

      1. Hi buygoldandprosper, in the interest of fostering deeper discussion, can you provide citations that show the state used bonding to incentivize Amazon to build these two sites?

      2. It was some time ago, but I recall something to this effect:

        Money from the state Department of Economic and Community Development, or DECD, is making the deal possible.
        “The company will be eligible to earn up to $15 million in Urban and Industrial Sites Reinvestment tax credits if certain job creation and capital investment goals are reached. An additional $5 million in credits may be available if initial job targets are surpassed.

        As for the North Haven site:
        The company will be eligible to earn up to $15 million in Urban and Industrial Sites Reinvestment tax credits if certain job creation and capital investment goals are reached. An additional $5 million in credits may be available if initial job targets are surpassed.
        Amazon also may be eligible for a sales and use tax exemption of up to $5 million on equipment and construction materials from the state.

        I could be wrong,but I thought I read about it in the Bond Commission agenda,back then. At the time,other states were getting warehouses at a much lower rate,as it were. The examples above do not include a lot of other items like fee waivers,etc.
        At least with Amazon, they met/exceeded their end of the bargin,such as it was. A rarity for the massive nine year give-away by the DECD under the previous governor.

  3. It was interesting at the LOB yesterday. There were many Toll supporters with various Union shirts on along with many No Tolls Ct volunteers. At 3:30 the Union guys were gone. I guess it was time to clock out for the day. I wonder what the rate of pay is for holding up signs?

    On the other hand, No tolls Ct people were still out in force.

    Come on Democrats. I dare you to vote for tolls.

  4. Something besides living within our means is always the answer in Connecticut. Transportation is the current magic bullet that will turn our state around. We’ve tried corporate welfare like the $1M per job Jackson labs. Surely minimum wage increases and paid family leave are the answer. There is never a lack of ideas to spend money we don’t have on things we don’t need.

    Until we get rid of one party rule in this state and replace some of the fools in Hartford, this state will continue to circle the drain.

    1. Someone recently got a job up in Maine,as Chancellor of the University system with zero background in education. The Jackson Labs deal worked out for at least one person who is now making $350K plus a whole bunch of perks.

  5. How embarrassing. Who will vote first? Come on. What a joke. I’m not for it but if this so “only responsible plan” as we have told. Just get over with. Now there is the debate who will call on the sword first.

  6. If they vote this in we need to vote out every democrat. I will make it a point to post signs in areas represented by legislators that vote for this. This will remind the people in November what they did. They will not be able to walk away from this. If this is voted on as an emergency to get around the rules how is that different that what is happening in Washington with the impeachment? CT Democrats are no different than Trump

  7. There is a major food distribution company in Cheshire with hundreds of trailor trucks making deliveries to our grocery stores. Did any Democrat legislator ask them how truck tolls will affect food prices? Is this company in favor of tolls to improve highways? I feel certain the answer is no.

  8. Wouldn’t it be a kick in the head if this is the only promise that is kept? What happens when Rhode Island loses the lawsuit filed by the American Trucking Association? What happens when the rosy revenue projections don’t materialize? And don’t you just love the wonderful illustration of what will and won’t be tolled?

  9. In case anyone was wondering :

    Rhode Island tolls exactly 2.2 miles of a single bridge.
    Vermont tolls exactly 11.9 miles of highway.
    Massachusetts tolls exactly 49.34 miles, nearly all the Mass Turnpike.
    Maine tolls exactly 81.61 miles of the Maine Turnpike.
    New Hampshire tolls exactly 97.3 miles of highway.

    1. Where in Vermont is there a tolled road?
      Please share with us, as I am unaware of ANY tolled road in VT.
      I also suspect your RI miles do not reflect the total extent of what gantries are either under construction or awaiting construction.

    2. Excellent point. Also, I can drive to Charlottesville,VA and pay less than three dollars or I can do it for close to sixty dollars. I have a choice.There are alternative no-toll routes. The venal politicians want you to have no choice in their one party fantasy world in Hartford.

  10. Since pavements take a beating from axle loads and NOT just vehicle class (size), why aren’t Class 6 & 7 trucks included? Their axle loads match or exceed the Class 8 thru 13.
    I’d bet that if they WERE included you’d hear an even greater outcry about tolls.

  11. Everyone who reads this article and the comments needs to sign the no tolls ct petition and send emails to the entire legislature telling the to vote NO!

    It’s working look at the postponements that is only happening because within the state they no the populace is watching.

    We are tired of being taxed to death by a corrupt state government. CUT SOMETHING!!!!!!!!

Leave a comment